3G in Restaurants?

4,302 posts in this topic

2 minutes ago, john g. said:

In a country where people have up to 450 euros a month taken out of their salaries for public health insurance, it is not surprising people want to use it or even be hypochondriac! What am I paying for? Ah yes! I have a headache.

 

Just now, jeba said:

They don't even have to go there. Calling in to get a sick note will already be reported to your health insurance.

 

I guess I never got the benefit of that with being self-employed. Whenever I ended up finally going to the doctor and he asked me if I needed a sick note I always had to tell him there was no point, I'd be working anyway. I was working with the bandage over my eye, 2 days after the operation. 😂

 

In any case, like I wrote before, it would be very interesting to see a breakdown of the cases reported to the BKK (or any other Krankenkasse for that matter). Maybe they are all just headaches being reported by work-shy noodles but I'd still like to see it.

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Same here, mate. Self-employed. 

You wimp! You were working two days after the operation? I was working DURING my eye operation!😂

I had only ONE eye that was being operated on!

The Finanzamt gave us TWO eyes!

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A second booster reduced the risk of infection by 50% and that of severe disease by more than 75% when compared to people who received only 1 booster:

Quote
Quote

The need for repeated booster vaccination is widely discussed, with some countries starting to offer a fourth dose. Preliminary data from Israel suggest an increased protective effect against infection (risk reduced by a factor of 2·0, 95% CI 2·0–2·1) and severe illness (risk reduced by a factor of 4·3, 2·4–7·6) 12 or more days after dose four when compared with people who received three doses.

Source: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(22)00282-3/fulltext?dgcid=raven_jbs_etoc_email

 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

What you find in the attached link is a Pfizer document entitled 
CUMULATIVE ANALYSIS OF REPORTED POST-APPROVAL ADVERSE EVENTS RECEIVED BY 28-FEB-2021. 
With the caveat that "reports are submitted voluntarily and the extent of underreporting is unknown". 
On page 7 there is a table with the most important data on adverse events reported during the monitoring period.

 

From there we learn that out of a total of 42,086 such cases, 1223 were fatal (deaths)!
As a percentage, deaths represent 2.9% of all adverse events reported in the 90-day period. 


Starting on page 30 of the document, you can read the appendices containing

the adverse reactions observed, which are listed on no less than 9 pages! 
It should be noted that this data, marked CONFIDENTIAL, could not be made public unless a US federal judge so decided.  


A reading of this material (and of the following documents to be declassified as a result of the court decision)

by MEDICAL doctors but especially by those who have made decisions

in pandemic would be mandatory, as long as you respect your profession. 


Just as they used to come out daily with messages like "I'm getting vaccinated so we can drink coffee together"

it would be necessary for them to come out now publicly and interpret this data for all to understand!

 

 

https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf

 

And all for a survival rate of 99.97% anyway.

No, thank you. Still unvaxxed, still negative.

 

 

275010786_485490329709502_1682758819177504441_n.jpg

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Indeed.

That's what happens when you can't see the forest for the trees.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Mr.Bear said:

From there we learn that out of a total of 42,086 such cases, 1223 were fatal (deaths)!
As a percentage, deaths represent 2.9% of all adverse events reported in the 90-day period. 

You are aware that adverse events are reported no matter whether there is a causal relationship to the drug/vaccine administered, are you? Or is this another case of misinterpreting data, just as your reporting the BKK data was? Apart from that, even if I´d trust that website (which I haven´t bothered to look into), these numbers alone would be meaningless without knowing the characteristics of the cohort under investigation. Given that a second booster was only recommended for high-risk groups, a relatively high number of adverse events should be expected in the first place. 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

8 PAGES OF KNOWN SIDE EFFECTS!

Pfizer wanted to hide this information from the general public for several decades but was forced to publish it.

THEY KNEW!

But instead of sharing the risks of taking the jab, they enforced it on children and babies.

Pfizer literally walks over dead bodies for profit.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Mr.Bear said:

8 PAGES OF KNOWN SIDE EFFECTS!

An adverse event isn't the same as a side effect. What part of that did you not understand? And how long is the list of "side effects" of an infection with corona? They may last quite long: https://in-cyprus.philenews.com/almost-a-third-of-people-report-lingering-symptom-6-12-months-after-covid-19/

A friend of mine has been suffering from loss of smell and tast for almost 2 years. Actually, he said his senses have returned, but not as they used to be before. Now, for him e.g. wine tastes like peppermint.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 05/03/2022, 10:20:40, Mr.Bear said:

From there we learn that out of a total of 42,086 such cases, 1223 were fatal (deaths)!
As a percentage, deaths represent 2.9% of all adverse events reported in the 90-day period. 

 

Yes but how do those 1223 fatalities look as a % of the number who have received the vaccination as opposed to a % of those who reported adverse events. It is like saying that there were 50% fatalities of those infected with covid who needed icu treatment rather than as a % of the total infected! I made those figures up by the way to demonstrate the point I have no idea how inaccurate they may be but suspect much the same for the figures supporting that 2.9%!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
48 minutes ago, keith2011 said:

 

Yes but how do those 1223 fatalities look as a % of the number who have received the vaccination as opposed to a % of those who reported adverse events. It is like saying that there were 50% fatalities of those infected with covid who needed icu treatment rather than as a % of the total infected! I made those figures up by the way to demonstrate the point I have no idea how inaccurate they may be but suspect much the same for the figures supporting that 2.9%!

 

I agree with you here, the numbers on their own are pretty meaningless.
To understand the true % we would need to know the total number vaccinated by that point.
It's a shame Pfizer won't provide that information.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"...reports of death (0.0023%) among people who received a COVID-19 vaccine"

 

Quote

Reports of death after COVID-19 vaccination are rare. FDA requires healthcare providers to report any death after COVID-19 vaccination to VAERS, even if it’s unclear whether the vaccine was the cause.

 

Reports of adverse events to VAERS following vaccination, including deaths, do not necessarily mean that a vaccine caused a health problem. More than 553 million doses of COVID-19 vaccines were administered in the United States from December 14, 2020, through February 22, 2022.

 

During this time, VAERS received 12,775 preliminary reports of death (0.0023%) among people who received a COVID-19 vaccine. CDC and FDA clinicians review reports of death to VAERS including death certificates, autopsy, and medical records.

https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/safety/adverse-events.html

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How many people got HIV after vaccination? Our local TT experts say: COVID-19 vaccine causes HIV

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And my triple jabbed colleague was tested positive today.

Tomorrow I have to do home office, my boss called me 5 minutes ago.

 

I feel ok, at the moment.

Still negative.

 

 

 

111.png

 

 

No idea.

I have never said/claimed such things.

I did reposted what real experts claim.

But i suppose that you cannot make the difference anymore.

 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Mr.Bear said:

No idea.

I have never said/claimed such things.

I did reposted what real experts claim.

But i suppose that you cannot make the difference anymore.

 

Do you know that everything on Internet is recorded? Tadaaa:

On 2/14/2022, 9:23:26, Mr.Bear said:

Vaccinated people - it would be good to get an HIV test.
You have been warned.

 

On 14th of February, 09:23:26 Mr. Bear claims that vaccines cause HIV. Then links the article where there is no such claim, Mr. Bear is functionally illiterate and did not understand what the article was about.

 

You will forever be Mr. "Vaccines cause HIV".

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Mr.Bear said:

And you see there a claim that "vaccines cause HIV"?

Where?

You are free to explain yourself. 

The "I reposted the doctors" defense does not work: there was no such claim in the article which you reposted, you added the comment yourself. In full conscience. 

 

I know that you never admit to being wrong, that's why I can make fun of you forever, Mr. HIV. 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now