Posted 20 Jan 2020 3 minutes ago, jeremytwo said: You'd have to check this fact out in either the Mail or the Express. Yeah people knock the Mail but owner Lord Rothermere hates the Establishment and has no time for royal wrong uns. The Mail is the only paper who had the guts to call out the child rape gangs, which is starting to come out thank God. SP: give it a fucking rest. So.. you read it on the net... I was right... unless of course, you get the mail or the express delivered each day.. 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted 20 Jan 2020 47 minutes ago, jeremytwo said: You'd have to check this fact out in either the Mail or the Express. Yeah people knock the Mail but owner Lord Rothermere hates the Establishment and has no time for royal wrong uns. The Mail is the only paper who had the guts to call out the child rape gangs, which is starting to come out thank God. SP: give it a fucking rest. Well, since you obviously are reluctant to provide links, I have googled myself. Just a few links added below. Doesn't look as if any military friendships have been broken. Prince Harry's Military Friends come to his Defense Prince Harry's army friend says 'a lot of good' will come from Pirnce Harry and Meghan Markle breaking away from the royal family - and insist the 'level-heraded' Duke 'hasn't changed' Many of Prince Harry's old military pals have come to his defense in the wake of his latest decision. Prince Harry previously served in the armed forces for 10 years, which included two tours to Afghanistan with the British Army. However, he ended his duties in 2015. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted 20 Jan 2020 I didnt mind them taking environmental considerations as their line of work. Actually I thought this was a good decision to do so. I just felt it was insincere when the issues with the extra flights came up and other things. Btw up until then I had been a full supporter of that couple. In fact I was seeing her as someone who like the Obamas had a great chance to get some stuck brains moving. I dont mind skin colour. Also never did take care of passports when choosing friends. If I remember correctly Charles had been under pressure for his endeavours into organic food at the beginning as well. He stuck to it. Was seen as sincere and now his organic farm products are well accepted and highly praised. Anyway thats spilled milk now. I really do wish them well and sincerly do hope that at least their marriage outlasts this whole desaster and they can find their inner peace and liefestyle. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted 20 Jan 2020 1 hour ago, bramble said: Well, since you obviously are reluctant to provide links, I have googled myself. Just a few links added below. Doesn't look as if any military friendships have been broken. Bramble if you have better sources then I stand corrected. This whole thing is a mess. Could be the girl just needs to grow up a lot. don't forget she is a new Mum, which adds huge pressure. 22 minutes ago, Wherearewegoingto said: I didnt mind them taking environmental considerations as their line of work. Actually I thought this was a good decision to do so. I just felt it was insincere when the issues with the extra flights came up and other things. Btw up until then I had been a full supporter of that couple. In the future they need to choose their causes carefully to be neutral. it is argued the landmine thing was a literal landmine for Diana. 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted 20 Jan 2020 22 minutes ago, jeremytwo said: Bramble if you have better sources then I stand corrected. This whole thing is a mess. Could be the girl just needs to grow up a lot. don't forget she is a new Mum, which adds huge pressure. Maybe you should stop portraying yourself as some kind of insider. You're not. 5 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted 20 Jan 2020 3 hours ago, fraufruit said: I've never heard them say they don't want more kids and, even if I "heard" it, I wouldn't believe it unless they said it publicly. That is really nobody's biz but their own. Harry "made it clear that he and his wife plan to have no more than two children, a decision that he appeared to link to a greater consideration for the planet." He never said no more kids. That was in the NYT in July 2019 and all over the net after he attended a Google summit in Italy and recounted meeting Jane Goodall. It ruffled a few feathers, which it needn't have. The British tabloids made it seem like he was dissing Kate and Will. You ae right - it's their business. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted 20 Jan 2020 Dont get upset. Everyone might remember it slightly different. But again I think its spilled milk. 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted 20 Jan 2020 6 hours ago, jeremytwo said: Don't forget Koo Stark, one of Randy Andy's first flames. The young 'uns here won't remember her. Oy. I am afraid that here my knowledge starts getting a little less exact. 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted 20 Jan 2020 2 hours ago, jeremytwo said: This whole thing is a mess. Could be the girl just needs to grow up a lot. It is not a mess. The press has made it a mess. The queen and the family are fine with it. She is a woman and she is grown up. STFU! 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted 20 Jan 2020 2 hours ago, bramble said: Maybe you should stop portraying yourself as some kind of insider. You're not. Oh but his intel. 4 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted 20 Jan 2020 4 hours ago, jeremytwo said: Lord Rothermere hates the Establishment Unless it`s a Nazi establishment then the family's all over them. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted 20 Jan 2020 4 hours ago, jeremytwo said: You'd have to check this fact out in either the Mail or the Express. J2 up to his usual tricks. Spouts bollocks as facts and when asked to back them up tells you to go look yourself. 5 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted 20 Jan 2020 Arthur Edwards, Royal photographer of over 40 years said Harry has changed since he met Meghan and not for the better. The comments are interesting too. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7868401/Royal-photographer-Arthur-Edwards-says-prince-changed-meeting-Meghan-Markle.html#comments 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted 21 Jan 2020 Another crap article in a toe-rag paper, that. 5 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted 21 Jan 2020 13 hours ago, BethAnnBitt said: ...he and his wife plan to have no more than two children... Let's read all the words very carefully. 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted 21 Jan 2020 22 hours ago, jeremytwo said: it is argued the landmine thing was a literal landmine for Diana. On which kooky site is that argued ? 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted 21 Jan 2020 6 hours ago, Wherearewegoingto said: ... I gotta say this quote expressed all my feeling on this topic succinctly. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted 21 Jan 2020 18 hours ago, White Rose of Yorkshire said: Arthur Edwards, Royal photographer of over 40 years said Harry has changed since he met Meghan and not for the better. The comments are interesting too. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7868401/Royal-photographer-Arthur-Edwards-says-prince-changed-meeting-Meghan-Markle.html#comments Urgh you made me click on a Mail link.. This from that article... Before Harry met Meghan they were [brothers] were very close. I fell in love with my wife, it didn't change my life. I just think it's really sad what's happening. I have to say that`s bollocks. If you marry and have a family it totally changes your life. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted 21 Jan 2020 Also, I presume he is now an ex-royal photographer after giving that interview.... 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
