Trump's Presidency: Is this the next domino to fall?

5,016 posts in this topic

9 hours ago, jeremytwo said:

Tho show that the court appearance is real and not ZH:

 

Nothing wrong with ZH, but it needs a filter like any other news source.     The lemmings on this thread who have been wrong for the past 231 pages should be looking to tune their filters, enhance their critical thinking skills, and alter their information sources to avoid being wrong for the next 3 years.   

 

On the sex cult thing, that is a story I would personally filter out.    If you go back a bit on this thread, you can probably notice people calling attention to porn star Stormy Daniels and her sleazy lawyer who while currently being charged with extortion  was touted as a viable Presdential candidate by CNN.   

 

This sex cult thing seems to have sensationalism but without the enormous dilated pupils.  It isn't going to make an impact, IMHO.   

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

The lemmings on this thread who have been wrong for the past 231 pages

 

She repeats again with zero evidence.

3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, AlexTr said:

 

She repeats again with zero evidence.

 

Very simple - go to any page in the thread from 2017 or 2018 and start reading.   The thread is the evidence.    

 

 

 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Request denied. Prove your charge or STFU.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Florida man defends Trump and threatens Democratic lawmakers. Just another day in the life of a trumpkin.

 

Quote

Lately, Donald Trump fans have enjoyed attacking left-leaning Americans. Last year, for instance, Miami-area resident Cesar Sayoc sent pipe bombs to prominent liberals across the nation and went to jail. Today another South Florida man was arrested, this time for allegedly threatening to kill four Democrats.

 

Federal authorities today announced that John Kless, a 49-year-old resident of Tamarac in Broward County, called three Democrats at their Washington, D.C. offices April 16 and left voicemail messages threatening murder. The lawmakers included California Congressman Eric Swalwell, Detroit Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib, and New Jersey Sen. Cory Booker.

...
 

In two of the three voicemail messages, Kless defended Trump and told lawmakers to stop criticizing him. After running Kless' name and phone number, federal investigators learned he had previously left "profane/harassing" messages at House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's office.

 

Kless has been charged with making threatening communications, a federal crime punishable by up to five years in prison. Kless is the second man this month arrested for threatening Omar: On April 4, an upstate New York man, Patrick W. Carlineo Jr., was arrested for threatening to shoot the congresswoman.

 

In response, Wilfredo Ruiz, a spokesperson for the Florida chapter of the Council of American-Islamic Relations, a civil-rights organization, said in a media release that Donald Trump's rhetoric is, indeed, sparking violence against Muslims. CAIR is also asking the federal government to charge Kless with hate-crimes.

 

 

3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mueller report: Subpoena issued for unredacted version

 

Quote

A subpoena demanding the release of the full report into Russian meddling during the 2016 election has been issued, amid claims the current version "leaves most of Congress in the dark".

 

Democrat Jerry Nadler, chairman of the House judiciary committee, argued it is entitled to an unredacted version.

 

Mr Trump's legal team argues it completely exonerates the president.

 

The Department of Justice has reacted by calling the subpoena "premature and unnecessary".

It said it would "continue to work with Congress to accommodate its legitimate requests consistent with the law and long-recognised executive branch interests".

 

Elizabeth Warren became the first Democratic presidential candidate to call for Mr Trump to be impeached.

"The severity of this misconduct demands that elected officials in both parties set aside political considerations and do their constitutional duty," said the Massachusetts senator.

 

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

5cbb4421463c1_TrumpExoneratedJimMorin042

 

Not 'not guilty', just the Scots verdict of 'not proven'.

5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, let's clear that up for everyone with a little analogy. Say you bought a used car  at a dealership. It looked good and drove pretty well, but you got a warranty anyway. After a little while, you noticed it wasn't running well, so you went back to the dealer. The dealer's mechanic said, "No, problems. It's just fine." Yet, you still had the problem. So, then you went to an independent mechanic and you asked him to tell you what was wrong. He came back to you with a laundry list of things, some major and some minor. 

Do you expect the mechanic to sue the dealership for you?

5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, AlexTr said:

Yes, let's clear that up for everyone with a little analogy. Say you bought a used car  at a dealership. It looked good and drove pretty well, but you got a warranty anyway. After a little while, you noticed it wasn't running well, so you went back to the dealer. The dealer's mechanic said, "No, problems. It's just fine." Yet, you still had the problem. So, then you went to an independent mechanic and you asked him to tell you what was wrong. He came back to you with a laundry list of things, some major and some minor. 

Do you expect the mechanic to sue the dealership for you?

 

What if the customer completely fabricated the problems and the independent mechanic verified that the car was sound but the dealer had been unpleasant when confronted with false accusations of impropriety?  :lol:

 

You never learn. 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's not what happened. I see you haven't bothered reading the actual report. Barr lied to you. Again.

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
40 minutes ago, AlexTr said:

That's not what happened. I see you haven't bothered reading the actual report. Barr lied to you. Again.

 

In his press conference, Barr stated that he has no objection to Mueller testifying in front of a Congressional panel.   If Barr has made material misrepresentations, Mueller will have a chance to publicly clarify any open points.    This is important. 

 

Congress is back in session on 29 April.   Hopefully, something can be arranged soon after.    

 

If Mueller does not deliver the next domino in his testimony, you can complain that the redacted parts of the report are key to determining the truth, and Mueller is in on the coverup.   

 

What do you think John Brennan meant when he said he had been given "bad information" after making sensational claims for 2+ years?   

 

 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Awww, everyone look at alt-bicus - isn't it cute? In addition to insisting that it's a female from Estonia, despite having long been busted as another SA618 alt, it has now decided to live in March 29, 2019 forever. For those of you who haven't been following at home, that's the day after Barr delivered his fictitious 4-page "summary" of the Mueller Report (although he realized just what a dumbfuck move that was a day or so later and tried to walk back the "summary" part several times since). That's when John Brennan was quoted stating that he had been given "bad information" (on Fox News, of course, which is why alt-bicus/March 29 Loretta knows about it).

 

Turns out, that will have been the happiest day in alt-bicus'/March 29 Loretta's life, because every day that has come after that has produced more and more bad news for Trump and those in his inner orbit - whether it's Trump fearing that he was "fucked" after learning that a special counsel had been appointed, Sarah Wonkeye Sanders admitting that she flat-out lied to the White House press, or Mueller taking steps to ensure that Trump's malfeasance will follow him long after he leaves office.

 

Too bad alt-bicus is as bad at gaslighting as s/he is at herding alts, because s/he's bet on the wrong pony. As the days pass and people get the chance to read and digest even the heavily redacted version of what Mueller and his team have written, they've found at least 10 instances of possible obstruction of justice committed by Trump personally, even as Trump's team continues its feeble efforts at distortion - much like alt-bicus does on here.

 

Trump may be able to order his follower sheep to watch his friends at Fox News and OANN continue the spin the bullshit that Barr is serving for breakfast, but you don't have that power, March 29 Loretta. The rest of us will continue to use real sources that are reporting in the present while you live in the past.

7

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've just started reading the report, should be done in about an hour.

 

https://pbs.twimg.com/card_img/1118975026185764865/qEnxuGCX?format=jpg&name=600x314

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"As Russia probe began, Trump called on spy chiefs for help"

 

Quote

WASHINGTON (AP) — Two months before special counsel Robert Mueller was appointed in the spring of 2017, President Donald Trump picked up the phone and called the head of the largest U.S. intelligence agency.

Trump told Mike Rogers, director of the National Security Agency, that news stories alleging that Trump’s 2016 White House campaign had ties to Russia were false and the president asked whether Rogers could do anything to counter them.

 

Rogers and his deputy Richard Ledgett, who was present for the call, were taken aback.

Afterward, Ledgett wrote a memo about the conversation and Trump’s request. He and Rogers signed it and stashed it in a safe. Ledgett said it was the “most unusual thing he had experienced in 40 years of government service.”

 

I wonder how often Dodgy Donny says "I'm fucked"...

3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, El Jeffo said:

The rest of us will continue to use real sources that are reporting in the present while you live in the past.

 

😂😂😂😂

 

Okay Jeffo - let me know when that next domino is going to fall.  

 

Smooch.  💋

 

 

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I must be on acid:

 

"Giuliani: Nothing wrong with Trump camp taking Russian help"

 

Quote

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump’s lawyer Rudy Giuliani insisted Sunday there was “nothing wrong” with the president’s 2016 campaign taking information from the Russians, as House Democrats pledged stepped-up investigations into campaign misconduct and possible crimes of obstruction detailed in special counsel Robert Mueller’s report .

 

Giuliani called the Trump campaign’s effort to get political help from representatives of the Russian government possibly ill-advised but not illegal.

 

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Knowing Trump, he'll lash out at the legal pot industry after having his eggshell feelings tapped with the teaspoon of satire...

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now