Posted 1 Apr 2017 Yup, really funny how the tables turn. 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted 2 Apr 2017 Or, rather, how the noose tightens. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted 3 Apr 2017 That's an odd thing to mock. I happen to be a big fan of social justice. I think all people should be the beneficiaries of justice and all people should strive to behave in a just way. Meh, well, I guess you don't feel the same way. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted 3 Apr 2017 Justice is for all. The system does not need any "beneficiary". Justice with a prefix is not justice anymore. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted 3 Apr 2017 "Social" is not a prefix. It is an adjective. Like administrative justice, legal justice, criminal justice, civil justice and SOCIAL justice. These are different justices under one big umbrella of justice generically. 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted 3 Apr 2017 So what areas of "social justice" is not covered in legal justice? 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted 3 Apr 2017 What part of the world social do you not understand? Did you just miss Plato, Aristotle, and Socrates in school? Or are you just playing dumb? 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted 3 Apr 2017 Again, you have not answered my question, but keep beating around the bush. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted 4 Apr 2017 Remember the times when liberals had problems trusting the mainstream media? Now they welcome it with open arms...The ultimate truth. Edit: please excuse the "it's" in the last block. Surely a lot of people are not that strong in English. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted 4 Apr 2017 For those who missed it, since no mainstream media likes charity work by Trump. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted 5 Apr 2017 Nuke button explained to Trump: 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted 5 Apr 2017 19 hours ago, Erdmann said: For those who missed it, since no mainstream media likes charity work by Trump. And how does that compare to the amount he's cut from their budget? "In order for the president to make up for his proposed $1.6 billion budget cuts to the Interior Department, which will almost certainly hinder the everyday “maintenance of national parks and historic sites,” he would need to donate roughly his next 20,425 paychecks, which would mean he would need to reside in the Oval Office for the next 5,100 years or so." 8 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted 5 Apr 2017 President's cuts to Interior: $1.5 billion President's check to Park Service: $77K Park Ranger's face: Priceless 8 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted 5 Apr 2017 Hmm, I didn't know that Trump was trying to compensate for the cuts by donating his salary. Good to know the Democrats think that way. Anyways, his next quarter will go to some other department. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted 5 Apr 2017 Yeah, to the EPA, no doubt, after proposing cutting its funding by 31 percent. But who needs clean air and water anyway, right? Let's bring back acid rain (thanks to "clean coal") and rivers catching fire again. Because that's what MAGA is all about, baby! Our rivers burn hotter and brighter than anybody else's! AMERICA, FUCK YEAH! 9 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
