QUOTE (Bell the cat @ Sep 3 2008, 6:50 pm)

Barack Obama has NEVER supported a federal ban on gay marriage and never will. He also supports civil unions, something that Palin supposedly opposes, and he has previously been a consistent supporter of gay rights legislation in Illinois.
I did not say that Obama had supported such a ban- I merely said that he was not a supporter of same sex marriage, which accurately represents his current position. Although it would not surprise me if Palin did support such a ban, I am not aware that she has stated support for one.
QUOTE
I think you are confused. A case had been brought to the Alaska Supreme Court where there was an eventual ruling that gay spouses should have equivalent spousal rights to heterosexual couples. Palin supported a referendum calling on the supreme court ruling to be overturned. However, despite the fact that the referendum got a majority and the bill had been submitted, Palin had to veto it because she was advised that to pass the legislation was now unconstitutional. Which makes it all the more laughable that the Log Cabin Republicans are now unbelievably claiming that her veto is an example of how she has positively legislated in favour of gay rights.
Rather than being confused, it is more likely that I am not aware of this case. I'll be happy to read any link on it you supply and go from there.
QUOTE
eh? I never said it wasn't. If I was black and she was a racist do you think I should respectfully excuse it because her "religion" told her to hate black people?
She isn't racist, though. Furthermore, you and I both find djgrazy's anti-Semitic and homophobic views completely disgraceful, yet it is not illegal for him to believe them (yes, expressing them is another matter in some jurisdictions).
QUOTE
I can understand her position but I reserve the right to disagree with it as trenchantly as I can.
Not a problem.
QUOTE
look if she was just sarah palin from down the road then yes I would probably excuse her bizarre religious views as just that. However, she is a candidate for the vice presidency who will be second in line to be leader of the free world behind a frail pensioner - I think that entitles gay americans and those of us who take an interest in these things to be very alarmed by her candidacy.
Checks and balances, BTC- remember that. McCain's not so frail.
QUOTE
It was you who claimed that one should excuse her views on abortion as they were based on her "value system". I was just pointing out that a similar (and equally reduntant) justification had recently been used to excuse burying women alive. Personally, I find it appalling when any politician uses their religion to impose their value system on people who do not follow that religion.
Please note the nuance I noted in my previous response to you. People find many motivations to impose things on others. It's no more justified
ceteris paribus if its motivations are non-religious.
The point is she is entitled to her views, regardless of their genesis- as are you.