TT logo
You are viewing a low-graphics version of this page. Click the headline to view full version:

U.S. Presidential Election 2008

McCain-Palin vs. Obama-Biden

Toytown Germany > Discussion forum > Themes > International affairs
Pages: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152
mlovett
QUOTE (Expaticus @ Sep 3 2008, 6:42 pm) *
Take the first sentence, quote it, and jam it into google. You get c. 20 hits. including the identical text and the name of the author who issued this from a Hotmail account.

It could be real, but looks a bit like that Kurt Vonnegut "Wear Sunscreen" thing at first glance.

Yeah, I guess Snopes will be on it soon enough...

Meanwhile, I no longer want to genetically engineer proteins in eurovol's company. He is mean! tongue.gif
Expaticus
QUOTE (mlovett @ Sep 3 2008, 7:47 pm) *
Yeah, I guess Snopes will be on it soon enough...

They're already on this one, which also shows that the leather miniskirt one earlier in this thread was photoshopped as well.
Conquistador
QUOTE (Bell the cat @ Sep 3 2008, 6:50 pm) *
Barack Obama has NEVER supported a federal ban on gay marriage and never will. He also supports civil unions, something that Palin supposedly opposes, and he has previously been a consistent supporter of gay rights legislation in Illinois.

I did not say that Obama had supported such a ban- I merely said that he was not a supporter of same sex marriage, which accurately represents his current position. Although it would not surprise me if Palin did support such a ban, I am not aware that she has stated support for one.

QUOTE
I think you are confused. A case had been brought to the Alaska Supreme Court where there was an eventual ruling that gay spouses should have equivalent spousal rights to heterosexual couples. Palin supported a referendum calling on the supreme court ruling to be overturned. However, despite the fact that the referendum got a majority and the bill had been submitted, Palin had to veto it because she was advised that to pass the legislation was now unconstitutional. Which makes it all the more laughable that the Log Cabin Republicans are now unbelievably claiming that her veto is an example of how she has positively legislated in favour of gay rights.

Rather than being confused, it is more likely that I am not aware of this case. I'll be happy to read any link on it you supply and go from there.

QUOTE
eh? I never said it wasn't. If I was black and she was a racist do you think I should respectfully excuse it because her "religion" told her to hate black people?

She isn't racist, though. Furthermore, you and I both find djgrazy's anti-Semitic and homophobic views completely disgraceful, yet it is not illegal for him to believe them (yes, expressing them is another matter in some jurisdictions).

QUOTE
I can understand her position but I reserve the right to disagree with it as trenchantly as I can.

Not a problem.

QUOTE
look if she was just sarah palin from down the road then yes I would probably excuse her bizarre religious views as just that. However, she is a candidate for the vice presidency who will be second in line to be leader of the free world behind a frail pensioner - I think that entitles gay americans and those of us who take an interest in these things to be very alarmed by her candidacy.

Checks and balances, BTC- remember that. McCain's not so frail.

QUOTE
It was you who claimed that one should excuse her views on abortion as they were based on her "value system". I was just pointing out that a similar (and equally reduntant) justification had recently been used to excuse burying women alive. Personally, I find it appalling when any politician uses their religion to impose their value system on people who do not follow that religion.

Please note the nuance I noted in my previous response to you. People find many motivations to impose things on others. It's no more justified ceteris paribus if its motivations are non-religious.

The point is she is entitled to her views, regardless of their genesis- as are you.
MonksTown
QUOTE (Conquistador @ Sep 3 2008, 8:04 pm) *
McCain's not so frail.

In his 70s and a history of cancer though innit.

Only heartbeat away from having some creationist nutter with her finger on the button to bring on the Book of Revelations. ph34r.gif
thefirelane
I'm curious how the persons on this thread who were so critical of Rev. Wright (particulalrly the ardent defenders of Israel) might react to this fact:

Palin's Church: Anti-Jewish Terror is "God's Judgment"

QUOTE
Brickner also described terrorist attacks on Israelis as God's "judgment of unbelief" of Jews who haven't embraced Christianity.

"Judgment is very real and we see it played out on the pages of the newspapers and on the television. It's very real. When [Brickner's son] was in Jerusalem he was there to witness some of that judgment, some of that conflict, when a Palestinian from East Jerusalem took a bulldozer and went plowing through a score of cars, killing numbers of people. Judgment — you can't miss it."

Palin was in church that day, Kroon said, though he cautioned against attributing Brickner’s views to her.
mlovett
QUOTE (Expaticus @ Sep 3 2008, 6:50 pm) *
They're already on this one, which also shows that the leather miniskirt one earlier in this thread was photoshopped as well.

Ok, there is a guy on another forum I am on, who lives in that town in Alaska, and he says this woman Anne is for real and attends council meetings. He says she's nuts, but then again, maybe so is he. smile.gif ahh... the internet!
Expaticus
QUOTE (Bell the cat @ Sep 3 2008, 8:27 pm) *

Thanks for the link. It leads to this one from 2004.

QUOTE
[Author of the aforementioned long email on palin] Anne Kilkenny describes herself as a 22-year Mat-Su resident, middle-aged housewife and at-home mom with a child in middle school and a retired, disabled spouse. She comes from a long line of independent-minded, public-spirited people and has been involved in education advocacy and legislative analysis for local PTAs. Prior to parenthood, she worked in the Alaska's seafood industry. She has a Social Science BA from the University of California, Berkeley

Berkely-educated, likely California transplant who came up to work the fishing boats and eventually became politically active in the local PTA.

I'm sure the natives love her.

Now she has her once-in-a-lifetime chance to be the Bella Abzug of Mat-Su.
mlovett
Of course she's nuts, she went to Cal... my alma mater. LOL
Conquistador
QUOTE (thefirelane @ Sep 3 2008, 8:16 pm) *
I'm curious how the persons on this thread who were so critical of Rev. Wright (particulalrly the ardent defenders of Israel) might react to this fact:

Palin's Church: Anti-Jewish Terror is "God's Judgment"

It's a misrepresentation to say it's her church since it was said by a guest speaker. I see no evidence that she is anti-Semitic in the least. It's a disgraceful smear. BTW, isn't Sullivan one of those who falsely claimed Trig was Palin's granddaughter?

BTW, here is the transcript of what this Brickner guy said:

http://www.wasillabible.org/sermon_files/2...m%20Dilemma.doc

Still looking through it to verify the claim, but don't see yet what is being claimed by Sullivan.

This may be what Sullivan was referring to on the guest sermon (but note there is no mention of anti-Jewish terror):

QUOTE
But what we see in Israel, the conflict that is spilled out throughout the Middle East, really which is all about Jerusalem, is an ongoing reflection of the fact that there is judgment. There is judgment that is going on in the land, and that’s the other part of this Jerusalem Dilemma. When Jesus was standing in that temple, He spoke that that judgment was coming, that there’s a reality to the judgment of unbelief. He said “I long to gather you, but...” what? “You were unwilling.” God never forces His way on human beings. And so because Jerusalem was unwilling to receive His grace, judgment was coming. He says, “Look, your house has left you desolate!” What did He mean by that? Remember where He is. He’s standing in the temple there in Jerusalem, the place where God had promised, through Moses,

It seems to me as though the sermon giver's problem is not with Jews per se- he mentions how secular Israel is. In my view, his sermon was nutty, but it has also been misrepresented.
Bell the cat
i agree that it is an idiotic smear to use the words of a preacher to undermine a candidate. Palin will no doubt express her views in due course and can be judged on those and those alone and not on the views of someone standing in a pulpit in a church she happens to go to.

Same issue as for Obama and Wright.
thefirelane
oh, and the comparisons just keep getting too good. Turns out, Palin's husband has ties with the Alaska Independence Party. I'm sorry, but wasn't a spouse's statement of merely being really proud seen as tantamount to treason? I'm curious how you might describe a desire to steal federal land and cause the breakup of the Union?
Expaticus
QUOTE (thefirelane @ Sep 3 2008, 8:52 pm) *
I'm curious how you might describe a desire to steal federal land and cause the breakup of the Union?

Texan?
thefirelane
Nah, Green Mountain Boy, all the way

cinzia
QUOTE (eurovol @ Sep 3 2008, 7:18 pm) *
None of these things makes Obama less than he is, but your constant belittling of him does in the minds of many. You need to realize that!

You give me much more credit than is due for my own ability to influence people's votes, eurovol.

But you might want to look back and see how much I've written about Sarah Palin in the past couple of days, and whether it was complimentary or not. Unlike yours, my Palin posts have been largely original writing (if not necessarily original thinking.)

I don't have to get behind your candidate and wave the flag, as I am being honest about my scepticism about both tickets. You need not assume, as you repeatedly do, that this scepticism arises from sour grapes over Hillary not getting the nomination. Believe me, I'm over it. But if you want to refer to "being on the winning team," it's more like my team got to the semifinals, but didn't make it to the Superbowl. Which doesn't mean I have to whole-heartedly back the team that beat her, just because they're from the same league. It's a poor metaphor, but it's yours, not mine.
Conquistador
QUOTE (thefirelane @ Sep 3 2008, 8:52 pm) *
oh, and the comparisons just keep getting too good. Turns out, Palin's husband has ties with the Alaska Independence Party. I'm sorry, but wasn't a spouse's statement of merely being really proud seen as tantamount to treason? I'm curious how you might describe a desire to steal federal land and cause the breakup of the Union?

Given the following:

QUOTE
http://www.akip.org/faqs.html
Q: What is the Alaskan Independence Party?

A: An Alaskan political party whose members advocate a range of solutions to the conflicts between federal and local authority; from advocacy for state's rights, through a return to territorial status, all the way to complete independence and nationhood status for Alaska.

...we cannot assume where he stands, although Obama supporters will obviously presume the worst.
Expaticus
... and we all remember the brutal squashing of the 1977 Martha's Vineyard/Nantucket secession movement and the resulting show trials and hangings for treason. </sarcasm>.
cinzia
Here's some thoughtful commentary on what's missing from the RNC: anything about the economy, and almost anyone not white.

QUOTE
I have combed the schedule of events here without finding a single forum, workshop or kaffeeklatsch devoted to what John McCain and the Republican Party propose to do about America's short- and long-term economic challenges. I've found four panels on what to do about the Middle East, but not one on what to do about the Middle West.


QUOTE
Republican silence on economic matters stands in sharp contrast to the Democratic convention last week in Denver, where there were close to 20 forums on "green" jobs, reviving progressive taxation, balancing the budget, rebuilding infrastructure, the economy of alternative energy and the like.


QUOTE
But the economy is not all; the GOP's last best hope remains identity politics. In a year when the Democrats have an African American presidential nominee, the Republicans now more than ever are the white folks' party, the party that delays the advent of our multicultural future, the party of the American past. Republican conventions have long been bastions of de facto Caucasian exclusivity, but coming right after the diversity of Denver, this year's GOP convention is almost shockingly -- un-Americanly -- white. Long term, this whiteness is a huge problem. This year, however, whiteness is the only way Republicans cling to power. If the election is about the economy, they're cooked -- and their silence this week on nearly all things economic means that they know it.
thefirelane
Man, it just doesn't stop.

QUOTE
Republican presidential candidate John McCain says his vice presidential pick, Sarah Palin, was already an experienced government official while his Democratic rival, Barack Obama, was working as a community organizer.

She wasn't.
Palin was finishing college, getting married and working as a TV sportscaster when Obama was directing a church-based community group on Chicago's South Side in 1985-88.
Conquistador
We always knew Joe Biden would be good for a few gaffes:

QUOTE
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/20...at-joe-n-2.html
The evening was full of Biden-isms, including the inevitable Obama/Osama slip, made when Biden was discussing the mountainous Afghanistan-Pakistan border "where Obama, Osama Bin Laden lives, and Obama wants to go to get him."

Since Osama Bin Laden is a bit similar to Obama Biden, I wonder if Joe is going to eventually make that gaffe. tongue.gif
cinzia
81 percent of former Hillary Clinton supporters now say they plan to vote for Obama in November.

Prior to the DNC (and also prior to McCain's appointment of Sarah Palin for his VP), the number was 70 percent.
Kat
Did anyone see this latest Indecision 2008? It's just laugh out loud funny: GOP: Give us one more chance. This time, we won't fu*k it up.
laugh.gif
llees
I find it quite bizarre that Palin's insisting that unmarried teenage girls keep their babies, but is intent on legislating away all the welfare programs that would enable those girls to finish school and not starve to death.

The duty of care she feels for these poor unwanted babies stops as soon as the baby's breathing air, apparently.
dolfan
Republicans aren't interested in legislating away welfare, they just talk about it. Much like fiscal responsibility, abortion, not being a shitbag, etc.
FuzzyTony
Sarah Palin, would-be banner of books...

Time Magazine says that when Sarah Palin took office as mayor, she approached the town librarian and asked how to go about banning books from the town library:

From Time Magazine, Sep. 02, 2008:

QUOTE
Mayor Palin: A Rough Record
[Former Wasilla mayor] Stein says that as mayor, Palin continued to inject religious beliefs into her policy at times. "She asked the library how she could go about banning books," he says, because some voters thought they had inappropriate language in them. "The librarian was aghast." That woman, Mary Ellen Baker, couldn't be reached for comment, but news reports from the time show that Palin had threatened to fire Baker for not giving "full support" to the mayor.
gemini
I have to say that I find it a bit lacking to post that supposed email from Anne from Alaska and then not add a link to verify it...and when requested...told to google it ourselves.

I would think you would want everyone to know where you found that little gem.

Here is something I found

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/03/us/polit...wasilla.html?hp

But her critics say too much growth too quickly has made a mess of what not long ago was homesteaded farmland.

QUOTE
And for some, Ms. Palin’s first months in office here were so jarring — and so alienating — that an effort was made to force a recall. About 100 people attended a meeting to discuss the effort, which was covered in the local press, but the idea was dropped.

Shortly after becoming mayor, former city officials and Wasilla residents said, Ms. Palin approached the town librarian about the possibility of banning some books, though she never followed through and it was unclear which books or passages were in question.

Ann Kilkenny, a Democrat who said she attended every City Council meeting in Ms. Palin’s first year in office, said Ms. Palin brought up the idea of banning some books at one meeting. “They were somehow morally or socially objectionable to her,” Ms. Kilkenny said.

The librarian, Mary Ellen Emmons, pledged to “resist all efforts at censorship,” Ms. Kilkenny recalled. Ms. Palin fired Ms. Emmons shortly after taking office but changed course after residents made a strong show of support. Ms. Emmons, who left her job and Wasilla a couple of years later, declined to comment for this article.

In 1996, Ms. Palin suggested to the local paper, The Frontiersman, that the conversations about banning books were “rhetorical
yanksavage
I've come to the conclusion that the Dems are afraid of Sarah Palin. Look at the attempts to smear her. How pathetic.
FuzzyTony
cinzia
QUOTE (yanksavage @ Sep 3 2008, 10:08 pm) *
I've come to the conclusion that the Dems are afraid of Sarah Palin. Look at the attempts to smear her. How pathetic.

I am terrified of her, myself, yanksavage. People are seriously considering voting for McCain, with Palin on the ticket. This is scary shit.
yanksavage
Don't worry cinzia the Obama Messiah will save you.
yanksavage
QUOTE (llees @ Sep 3 2008, 3:58 pm) *
I find it quite bizarre that Palin's insisting that unmarried teenage girls keep their babies, but is intent on legislating away all the welfare programs that would enable those girls to finish school and not starve to death.

The duty of care she feels for these poor unwanted babies stops as soon as the baby's breathing air, apparently.

Actually Republicans want to end the Welfare industry by promoting responsibilty. The dems on the other hand, love the irresponsible, that's where they get their votes.
FuzzyTony
Hallelujah!
yanksavage
Can you give me an Amen Fuzzy Tony?
cinzia
You're predicting an Obama victory in November, then, yanksavage?

Not what I would have expected, coming from you.
yanksavage
Cinzia, he very well may win. If he does, I predict 10% unemployment, the Dollar trading at $2.50 to the Euro and Riots in the streets.
cinzia
Pretending that people could and should do everything for themselves, and that the wealthiest nation on Earth can't or shouldn't help them, is what's irresponsible, yanksavage.
yanksavage
keeping peopple in poverty and ignorance, as the Dems have done for over 40 years is cruel.
cinzia
We have riots in the streets already here in St. Paul, yanksavage. Protesting the Republican policies of the past 8 years.
cinzia
I'm going to give you a chance to explain that one. Try to be lucid.
yanksavage
you see cinzia, my predictions are coming true!! I'll let you have the last word. I'm late for meeting.
mere
as of yesterday (no clue what it is today, could be back super low again) the dollar was up (slighly) compared to what it has been lately.
yanksavage
The welfare state began just over 40 years ago, started with the Johnson administration. I believe that he Dems get their votes from the poor. Make sense to you?
Bell the cat
QUOTE (yanksavage @ Sep 3 2008, 9:08 pm) *
I've come to the conclusion that the Dems are afraid of Sarah Palin. Look at the attempts to smear her. How pathetic.

she's the VP candidate who nobody knew anything about, not even it would appear John McCain. Who can blame the press for doing a little digging frankly and it is the press and not the Obama campaign, which has held fire, that has been doing the running.

What were the republicans thinking? Did they really have no adequate vetting procedure?
sgt.schmitty
QUOTE (cinzia @ Sep 3 2008, 6:33 pm) *
It is people like eurovol, much more than the candidate himself, who puts me off Obama.

thats why i stopped going to church...

an organization isn't any better than the people in it, no?
cinzia
In a word, no. How would you explain that the Democrats have held the Presidency for only the past 18 of those 45 years (LBJ took office in 1963), then?

Never mind. I'll just let your idiotic ramblings stand. Anyone can see them for what they are. Not worth my time and energy.
cinzia
Maybe so, sgt.schmitty, but I'll give the Democrats credit enough to consider that eurovol is no doubt "the least of these."
spatown
QUOTE (FuzzyTony @ Sep 3 2008, 10:02 pm) *
Sarah Palin, would-be banner of books...
Time Magazine says that when Sarah Palin took office as mayor, she approached the town librarian and asked how to go about banning books from the town library:From Time Magazine, Sep. 02, 2008:

QUOTE (cinzia @ Sep 3 2008, 10:35 pm) *
I am terrified of her, myself, yanksavage. People are seriously considering voting for McCain, with Palin on the ticket. This is scary shit.

if I can make a comment between the erudite and knowledgeable posts being made here, this woman is seriously scary. Even if only one thing is true, ie that she tried to ban books in public library because she didn't approve of the language in them, doesn't this make you want to shiver? This person apparently used her position in public office to interfere and control what the public should or should not be able to read. Words that spring to mind are arrogant, fanatical, roughshod, unwavering extremism, and a total conviction that her views are the only ones to be considered because she knows best.

Add to this a President candidate who still looks to me as though he will fall off the branch in a few months if he gets in, and you have a unelected fanatic slotting into the position of President dealing with the Middle East crisis and dear Mr Putin, with her finger on the button??? Oh help - please! sad.gif

I don't give a monkeys what party she is in - this woman is dangerous and should not be VP.
cinzia
BTC, this is the Republican's vetting procedure as it pertains to Sarah Palin:

1. Got vagina? Check.
2. Got conservative cred? Check.

OK, sign 'er up!

The rest, they think they can either shame the press into shutting up about or explain away. To the extent that very likely tonight, we will actually witness a hockey stadium full of people with self-described "family values" applauding wildly for an unwed, pregnant teenage couple.
FuzzyTony
Here's something else (apologies if this snippet has already been raised by someone here before):

Palin Slashed Funding for Teen Moms

QUOTE
WashPo: Sep. 2, 2008 - St. Paul -- Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, the Republican vice-presidential nominee who revealed Monday that her 17-year-old daughter is pregnant, earlier this year used her line-item veto to slash funding for a state program benefiting teen mothers in need of a place to live. After the legislature passed a spending bill in April, Palin went through the measure reducing and eliminating funds for programs she opposed. Inking her initials on the legislation -- "SP" -- Palin reduced funding for Covenant House Alaska by more than 20 percent, cutting funds from $5 million to $3.9 million. Covenant House is a mix of programs and shelters for troubled youths, including Passage House, which is a transitional home for teenage mothers.

It's enough to make an old man choke. ohmy.gif

MonksTown
Then again, if it is a possibility that a President McCain might throw a seven after only a short while in office surely there are sane people inside the GOP that would have kept Ms fundamentalist book burner off the ticket?
cinzia
MT, they're taking this one day at a time, is my thought. First, they've got to get McCain elected. They'll worry about the rest later.

Word is, even McCain didn't want Palin for a running mate. He wanted Joe Liebermann. But he was scared into picking someone more conservative (OK, much more conservative.) Which throws his maverick credentials to the four winds and puts his judgment into serious doubt in one fell swoop.
Pages: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152
You are viewing a low fidelity version of this page. Click to view the full page.