Un-fucking-believable. Living in Germany and having visited more than a dozen Countries must make me a frigging EXPERT! I will be that I have even visited more US States than she has. That must make me a Domestic Policy EXPERT too!
kitty_kat
Aug 31 2008, 8:53 pm
QUOTE (thefirelane @ Aug 31 2008, 5:13 pm)
The linked article's picture is of the mother when she is 6 months pregnant?! There is an interesting photo of her daughter here. Her daughter was remove from school for the 4-5 months that coincided with the end of her mother's pregnancy, due to "mono"
Even if true, and apparently some even in the Alaskan community, believe it is. Any one or group who would wage a campaign with the info might be committing political suicide. Would be interesting to see where this goes, who picks it up and how far. In that photo, the daughter certainly doesn't even look like a happy 'love-my-family-even-for-this-boring-photo' kid.
cinzia
Aug 31 2008, 10:02 pm
That whole story about Trig being Palin's grandson and not her son at all is really weird. How did she fly all the way home to Alaska from Dallas while in labor with her 5th child, and nobody knew she was even in advanced pregnancy?
Some people are saying, well, Trig was small at birth, 6 pounds 2 ounces. My daughter was 6 pounds 3 ounces at birth, and I looked like a frickin' elephant in the last few weeks. My frame is larger than Palin's, but I was not overweight before I was pregnant, either. The headless photos of Palin, if they are her, at 8.5 months pregnant, look more like I did at around 4 months, and this was my first child. Most women show their pregnancies much earlier after the first child, but Palin was able to keep the pregnancy secret except for immediate family, until she was 8 months gone?
No doubt Palin apologists will say this has nothing to do with whether Palin is qualified to be vice president (*suppressing a snicker*.) To them, Daily Kos has this response:
QUOTE
There could be calls below [in the comments section] to delete this information. Calls that this type of information is muckraking and 'below us'. The truth is not below any progressive, nor any citizen of the world that is one heartbeat away from having Palin as leader of the free world. We simply ask that she be forthright, honest, and not waste our time with such juvenile games that anyone with eyes can see as fabrication.
The buzz is deafening.
cinzia
Aug 31 2008, 10:39 pm
Update on the ongoing Minneapolis house and other raids by local police and the FBI:
QUOTE
As the police attacks on protesters in Minnesota continue -- see this video of the police swarming a bus transporting members of Earth Justice, seizing the bus and leaving the group members stranded on the side of the highway -- it appears increasingly clear that it is the Federal Government that is directing this intimidation campaign. Minnesota Public Radio reported yesterday that "the searches were led by the Ramsey County Sheriff's office. Deputies coordinated searches with the Minneapolis and St. Paul police departments and the Federal Bureau of Investigation."
Today's Star Tribune [the local Twin Cities newspaper] added that the raids were specifically "aided by informants planted in protest groups." Back in May, Marcy Wheeler presciently noted that the Minneapolis Joint Terrorist Task Force -- an inter-agency group of federal, state and local law enforcement led by the FBI -- was actively recruiting Minneapolis residents to serve as plants, to infiltrate "vegan groups" and other left-wing activist groups and report back to the Task Force about what they were doing. There seems to be little doubt that it was this domestic spying by the Federal Government that led to the excessive and truly despicable home assaults by the police yesterday.
So here we have a massive assault led by Federal Government law enforcement agencies on left-wing dissidents and protesters who have committed no acts of violence or illegality whatsoever, preceded by months-long espionage efforts to track what they do. And as extraordinary as that conduct is, more extraordinary is the fact that they have received virtually no attention from the national media and little outcry from anyone.
. . .
Just review what happened yesterday and today. Homes of college-age protesters were raided by rifle-wielding police forces. Journalists were forcibly detained at gun point. Lawyers on the scene to represent the detainees were handcuffed. Computers, laptops, journals, diaries, and political pamphlets were seized from people's homes. And all of this occurred against U.S. citizens, without a single act of violence having taken place, and nothing more serious than traffic blockage even alleged by authorities to have been planned.
. . .
Any rational person planning to protest the GOP Convention would, in light of this Government spying and these police raids, think twice -- at least -- about whether to do so. That is the point of the raids -- to announce to citizens that they best stay in their homes and be good, quiet, meek, compliant people unless they want their homes to be invaded, their property seized, and have rifles pointed at them, too. The fact that this behavior is producing so little outcry only ensures, for obvious reasons, that it will continue in the future.
The Republican National Convention doesn't even start (and then anemically, due to Hurricane Gustav) till tomorrow.
gatzke
Aug 31 2008, 11:32 pm
QUOTE
Today's Star Tribune [the local Twin Cities newspaper] added that the raids were specifically "aided by informants planted in protest groups." Back in May, Marcy Wheeler presciently noted that the Minneapolis Joint Terrorist Task Force -- an inter-agency group of federal, state and local law enforcement led by the FBI -- was actively recruiting Minneapolis residents to serve as plants, to infiltrate "vegan groups" and other left-wing activist groups and report back to the Task Force about what they were doing. There seems to be little doubt that it was this domestic spying by the Federal Government that led to the excessive and truly despicable home assaults by the police yesterday.
My wife and I were vegan for a few weeks, wonder if we could help infiltrate stinko pinko orgs? Dumbest diet we have tried (yet).
gatzke, if you and the missus were vegans, you ARE pinkos, according to the Regime. I hope you've done your penance and eaten some really bloody steaks since that streak of lunacy.
DanHessen
Aug 31 2008, 11:54 pm
"So here we have a massive assault led by Federal Government law enforcement agencies on left-wing dissidents and protesters who have committed no acts of violence or illegality whatsoever, preceded by months-long espionage efforts to track what they do."
I'm no lawyer but I'm gonna go out on a limb and say law enforcement does not have to wait until the actual commission of a crime to act. In fact, the whole idea is that they prevent crime before it happens. It appears as if some of the guys that got busted were in possession of the tools of the trade for those who resort to criminal means when protesting. Unless, of course, you think the average Joe has five gallon drums of piss laying around their house.
Also, law enforcement use of informants, even at the federal level, is not the same as "espionage". Remember Huggy Bear on Starksy and Hutch? Same concept.
You have the usual suspects showing up and they are apparently willing to use criminal means to shut down the city and otherwise wreak havoc and Minneapolis was basically having none of it. I'm guessing the citzenry up in Minny is more than happy with the effort since they'd generally like to avoid being stuck on the freeway for six hours because a bunch of protestors chained themselves to it. Essentially, peaceful protest = one thing. Shutting down a city's infrastructure = something else entirely.
cinzia
Sep 1 2008, 12:08 am
DanHessen, indeed many of the local citizenry are taking the police reports of finding buckets of pee to indicate that these guys were really up to no good. Otherwise, the police found nothing but the usual organizers' stuff and things that could be lying around anyone's house: computers, city maps, journals, etc.
Here's what the defense lawyer has to say about the urine:
QUOTE
"The one bucket of urine they got was from some guy out in the back garage," Nestor said. "The guy's been living there eight or nine years. He's got nothing to do with the people in the house. It's a fabrication."
From Glenn Greenwald, in town and unexpectedly covering these police actions:
QUOTE
Beyond that, there is a widespread sense that the targets of these raids deserve what they get, even if nothing they've done is remotely illegal. We love to proclaim how much we cherish our "freedoms" in the abstract, but we despise those who actually exercise them. The Constitution, right in the very First Amendment, protects free speech and free assembly precisely because those liberties are central to a healthy republic -- but we've decided that anyone who would actually express truly dissident views or do anything other than sit meekly and quietly in their homes are dirty trouble-makers up to no good, and it's therefore probably for the best if our Government keeps them in check, spies on them, even gets a little rough with them.
After all, if you don't want the FBI spying on you, or the Police surrounding and then invading your home with rifles and seizing your computers, there's a very simple solution: don't protest the Government. Just sit quietly in your house and mind your own business. That way, the Government will have no reason to monitor what you say and feel the need to intimidate you by invading your home. Anyone who decides to protest -- especially with something as unruly and disrespectful as an unauthorized street march -- gets what they deserve.
I guess you'd agree with that, then, DanHessen?
FuzzyTony
Sep 1 2008, 12:22 am
Here's John McCain's Vice Presidential nominee Sarah Palin as a sports reporter for KTUU, Anchorage's NBC affiliate, back in 1988 (she was Sarah Heath then):
DanHessen
Sep 1 2008, 12:22 am
"The one bucket of urine they got was from some guy out in the back garage," Nestor said. "The guy's been living there eight or nine years. He's got nothing to do with the people in the house. It's a fabrication."
If you believe that, I've got some oceanfront property in AZ for sale. I mean, Hell, everyone I know keeps large buckets of piss in their garage. Seriously, we all know there are protestor groups who will cross the line in terms of civil disobedience. Everybody knows it. It seems as if the busted guys had the whole toolshop to build these sleeping dragons and whatnot. If you want to believe it was all just a bunch of innocent hippies who just happened to, rather unfortunately, be in close proximity to recent large purchases from Home Depot of items which are coincidentally used for illegal protest actions...well, believe away.
Look, I have no problem with anyone who wants to engage in a bit of civil disobedience. Do your sit-in, make your point, get put in jail overnight, and everyone's cool. But when you look at what these guys have done at recent G-8 meetings, trying to shut down entire cities...well basically... fuck'em.
Incidentally, do you view federal law enforcement infiltration of the Ku Klux Klan and the Aryan Nation as "domestic spying" or "political espionage"?
cinzia
Sep 1 2008, 12:31 am
Sorry, am I missing something, or have some of these same people killed attendees at G8 summits?!?! Um, not the same as the KKK, no.
I agree with you that keeping a bucket (one bucket) of pee in your house is not the usual in Minneapolis. Then again, as far as I know it's not lethal or illegal.
If these groups were indeed infiltrated by informants, said informants wouldn't have had anything to offer the police that would justify the FBI and authorities from the next county over, raiding houses with automatic weapons. Not to mention detaining reporters in their house at gunpoint without any warrants, so they can't cover and film what the police were doing elsewhere in town.
For weeks, advisers close to the campaign said, Mr. McCain had wanted to name as his running mate his good friend Senator Joseph I. Lieberman of Connecticut, the Democrat turned independent. But by the end of last weekend, the outrage from Christian conservatives over the possibility that Mr. McCain would fill out the Republican ticket with Mr. Lieberman, a supporter of abortion rights, had become too intense to be ignored.
With time running out, and after a long meeting with his inner circle in Phoenix, Mr. McCain finally picked up the phone last Sunday and reached Ms. Palin at the Alaska State Fair. Although the campaign’s polling on Mr. McCain’s potential running mates was inconclusive on the selection of Ms. Palin — virtually no one had heard of her, a McCain adviser said — the governor, who opposes abortion, had glowing reviews from influential social conservatives.
Conquistador
Sep 1 2008, 7:14 am
QUOTE (horseshoe7 @ Aug 29 2008, 5:54 pm)
Typical slippery response. In all my time on TT, you have never once said "I was wrong." A flat out apology is unimaginable. Doesn't that tell you something about yourself? I admit when I'm wrong, and I think that eurovol is often wacked out, KK isn't always there with the whole "backup" thing, but at least she inspires thought. I don't take issue with those sorts because they don't go around like the biggest know-it-alls. Even if they did, their tone is not nearly so patronising and self-righteous.
Of course I'm trying to give you a hard time. I find your style of posting highly annoying. You're not bulletproof, nobody is, so stop expecting yourself and others to be, then perhaps conversations in this thread won't always dissolve into pettiness.
You know as well as anyone that no response would have pleased you. Better to stop deceiving yourself- it's not about "tone" or any other excuse- you simply hate the US, and more specifically, US citizens who don't share your views of the US and/or your political views.
That's the first time you have indicated less than satisfaction with the comments of eurovol and KK.
Your demands for me to say "I was wrong" are rather hollow when you don't do it yourself- have you admitted your "thugs" allegation was unfounded? No. Do you demand your fellow leftists back up even their most ludicrous claims, e.g., KK's allegation of a bribe being paid to the networks? No. That was a really inspiring thought, BTW. You defend her because you are a leftist just like her and you like her negative comments about the US, e.g., "the country is in ruins". I have never seen KK admit she was wrong, even when confronted by conclusive proof. Yet you have nothing to say to her. Why? Almost certainly because you have similar political views.
Finally, if you were actually honest, you would have to admit eurovol and KK do often act "as if they know it all". Especially eurovol, who once claimed to me because he has been published in scholarly journals in the biological sciences, he must be some expert in economics.
Horseshoe, it's time for you to drop your vendetta, and to get over your anti-Americanism. And- for the upteenth time- let's stick to the thread topic. You have done more than anyone to ensure this thread "dissolves into pettiness".
Jules Winnfield
Sep 1 2008, 8:27 am
QUOTE (eurovol @ Aug 30 2008, 1:06 pm)
What trouble?
If the actual poll figures matched the bombastic rhetoric coming from posters here, one would expect to see Obama ahead by at least twenty percentage points. RCP has him at plus 3.5. Stunning.
QUOTE
As a Hillary supporter, you should be doing what Hillary told you to do. Why aren't you? Or are you a PUMA too?
I am not a grassroots campaigner! These are the people that your candidate has failed to energize through a combination of his own arrogance and overall weakness as a candidate. As much as you blindly criticize Hillary Clinton for everything - which in its nature is very similar to obsessive Bush bashing - you will not admit that snubbing her is what is costing him dearly now! You will learn your lesson in November...
QUOTE (thefirelane @ Sep 1 2008, 7:40 am)
and confirming what we all thought, this was a last minute desperation pick...
Heh? I think that it was rather obvious that McCain would pick someone with solid conservative credentials - there's nothing desperate about that.
BattalionBoy
Sep 1 2008, 9:41 am
This thread is almost like watching paint dry. Don’t be surprise if some time soon you login and find it moved to the home decorating section. If I had my way I would just delete this waste of disk storage outright especially as it is full of Democrats.
The economic problems that the US is undergoing is caused by cheap Democrats buying all this Chinese made produce from places like Wal-Mart. Did you know that Michelle Obama even worked for a Wal-Mart supplier? If the Democrats get into power this Chinese debt will balloon and it will get to the point where it will take a war with China to get out of paying it all back. Also Democrats have been buying property way out of their capacity to pay back the motgages causing economic problems for the rest of us.
Also if Obama gets into to power the secret service and covert military divisions will have no respect for any cheese dick Democrat lawyers and they are already out of control fighting and stirring up trouble in places like Georgia. The guy is so skinny it is un-American even his wiff has more muscle than him. It was funny to watch his acceptance speech at that stadium his head grew so much it made him look even skinnier.
As much as you blindly criticize Hillary Clinton for everything - which in its nature is very similar to obsessive Bush bashing - you will not admit that snubbing her is what is costing him dearly now! You will learn your lesson in November...
The cult of personality that is Hillary supporters is simply amazing. As you say, Obama is not all powerful so how do you expect him to break your cultish blind devotion to the losing candidate? You demonstrate on a daily basis towards Hillary the things you say are so bad about Obama supporters. And what is worse is that you don't even see it. Talk about your pots and kettles.
BattalionBoy
Sep 1 2008, 9:57 am
Obama refers to Hillary Cliton as Annie Oakley so maybe he will appoint her the United States Secretary of Defense. I would be afraid of her after seeing the way she scratched and clawed away at that glass ceiling.
Kommentarlos
Sep 1 2008, 9:58 am
QUOTE (kitty_kat @ Aug 31 2008, 12:40 am)
John McCain's VP Governor Sarah Palin lost the 1984 Miss Alaska pageant to Maryline Blackburn .
Good to read that my predictions that this campaign is going to be run increasingly on grooming issues are coming along nicely
You really couldn't make it up ...
moctoj2
Sep 1 2008, 10:01 am
As for qualifications about foreign policy, I've been to 12 countries, 4 continents, 30 states, (lived in 5 of them) and lived in Germany for 21 months. I've had a passport since 1977 and she got one last year. I have more foreign policy experience than the VP McCain picked. He calls her a soulmate and doesn't even know her. John Stewart said it best - McCain wants everyone to meet his third wife. I'll repeat, McCain's campaign "jumped the shark" when he picked her. He will win over the die hard republicans (like 2/3 of my family) and all of the independents that have half a brain will know this when they vote in November and pick Obama.
horseshoe7
Sep 1 2008, 2:14 pm
QUOTE (Conquistador @ Sep 1 2008, 8:14 am)
You know as well as anyone that no response would have pleased you. Better to stop deceiving yourself- it's not about "tone" or any other excuse- you simply hate the US, and more specifically, US citizens who don't share your views of the US and/or your political views.
So, you're still not admitting to being wrong at times. Why can't you just answer a direct question? Why must it always be deflected onto other people? See? That's slippery. My issue is indeed about tone. I don't hate americans generally, but it would be nice if some of them could pull their heads out of the sand. And don't cite some thing I said in the past because I'm saying it now - I don't generally hate americans - they're people just like everyone else. I take issue with ignorance, which in my view is rather prevalent in North America (see, canada too), but likely related to geographical isolation from the rest of the world, poor education, and highly biased news networks. Of course, I have no proof it's just a hypothesis. Last time I checked this was a chat board.
QUOTE
... You defend her because you are a leftist just like her and you like her negative comments about the US ... Yet you have nothing to say to her. Why? Almost certainly because you have similar political views.
Why? As originally stated, it has to do with your tone. She has never attacked my opinion before so I have no real reason to be that upset with her expressing her viewpoint. Anyway, those "leftists" aren't even close to being as patronising as you (despite them having some wild views, some good some ridiculous. You on the other hand don't have opinions - you cut out your role here to be the guy that has to tell everyone why they're wrong.) Why is any critic of the US demonized for their opinion? Why do you attempt to label "Leftists" and "Obama Supporters" as bad? I certainly get that impression that that's what you're doing.
You've yet to answer a direct question you know, and you've yet to ignore a single criticism about yourself from anyone. That tells me something about your character.
cinzia
Sep 1 2008, 2:32 pm
thefirelane's NY Times link is worth a few quotes on the thread:
QUOTE
. . . Mr. McCain hated running as the wizened old hand of experience. Despite his embrace this year of President Bush and many of the administration’s policies, Mr. McCain, a campaign adviser said, still saw himself as the maverick who delighted in occasionally throwing political grenades at his own Party.
Ms. Palin, and not Mr. Pawlenty or Mr. Romney, would reinforce Mr. McCain’s self-image, an adviser said. She had a reputation as a reformer in Alaska, she hunted and fished, and she had once belonged to a union. Just as crucial, Ms. Palin, 44, was beloved by the party’s religious base but did not come off as shrill. “She’s conservative,” Mr. Black said, “but she’s not an ideologue.”
After Mr. McCain contacted Ms. Palin, Mr. Schmidt and Mr. Salter met with her on Wednesday in Flagstaff, Ariz. It was not until the following morning that she traveled to Sedona to meet with Mr. McCain, who then sat down with her for his only interview of a potential running mate.
Within hours if not minutes after the interview was concluded, Ms. Palin had the job.
QUOTE
The selection [of Governor Palin] was the culmination of a five-month process, described by Mr. McCain’s inner circle and outside advisers in interviews this past weekend, and offers a glimpse into how Mr. McCain might make high-stakes decisions as president.
At the very least, the process reflects Mr. McCain’s history of making fast, instinctive and sometimes risky decisions. “I make them as quickly as I can, quicker than the other fellow, if I can,” Mr. McCain wrote, with his top adviser Mark Salter, in his 2002 book, “Worth the Fighting For.” “Often my haste is a mistake, but I live with the consequences without complaint.”
Well, that's dandy, Senator McCain, but it's not fair for you to make the rest of us live with the consequences, just because you want to see yourself as youthful again. Maverick, cowboy, what's the difference?
Conquistador
Sep 1 2008, 4:49 pm
QUOTE (horseshoe7 @ Sep 1 2008, 3:14 pm)
So, you're still not admitting to being wrong at times. Why can't you just answer a direct question? Why must it always be deflected onto other people?
How about this, come up with something you think I was wrong about (of course you have yet to admit you were wrong about a lot of things, e.g., your false thugs claim- maybe you should worry about stuf like that first). If it is so important for someone to admit they are wrong, why are you not all over eurovol, KK, or for that matter, yourself. None of you admit you are wrong. By your ultrasuperior logic, you are ALL very slippery- and very BAD for never admitting you are wrong.
QUOTE
Why? As originally stated, it has to do with your tone. She has never attacked my opinion before so I have no real reason to be that upset with her expressing her viewpoint. Anyway, those "leftists" aren't even close to being as patronising as you (despite them having some wild views, some good some ridiculous. You on the other hand don't have opinions - you cut out your role here to be the guy that has to tell everyone why they're wrong.) Why is any critic of the US demonized for their opinion? Why do you attempt to label "Leftists" and "Obama Supporters" as bad? I certainly get that impression that that's what you're doing.
How often can you be wrong- I do express my opinion, and as is my right do so, I sometimes criticize what others post. As for your impression, it is no reason to hijack a thread- what impression do you think people get about your posts about US conservatives and Americans in general. I think much of what Obama supporters post is inaccurate or simply delusional. As for tone, take a look in the mirror before you criticize anyone else.
QUOTE
You've yet to answer a direct question you know, and you've yet to ignore a single criticism about yourself from anyone. That tells me something about your character.
Whatever. Your little Crusade of Hyprocrisy says much more about you- not that anyone really cares. BTW, you have amply shown that you cannot take criticism- and you are far from the only one on your side of the aisle. Nor can you stop yourself from hijacking a thread in order to pursue a personal vendetta.
horseshoe7
Sep 1 2008, 5:04 pm
The only time I hit back at you (like this last little flare up) is when I feel your tone just gets out of hand. I've already said in so many words that I have made mistakes, that other people post some ridiculous shit, and that I often don't have sources to back up a statement which I had (perhaps wrongly) assumed could stand on its own. So I don't understand why you're trying to turn it around.
Look I don't want this to descend into more petty crap. It's really not very fun for me, this shit. I could scour through threads and find out where you were wrong, but what's the point?? (You now have the choice to provoke this further or to let it go.) I'm happy to simply ignore you, and would be equally happy when you ignore me. I don't like "hijacking" threads as you so put it, so that's all I'm gonna say.
That's my attempt at peace. I hope you can just write "Ok." and that'll be that.
Conquistador
Sep 1 2008, 5:10 pm
I welcome a return to a discussion on the issues. Looks to me like you, horseshoe, were always the one doing the attacking, so if you can refrain from going off topic I see no reason why would be discussing any of this stuff.
IMHO, choosing Palin was more about attracting working class voters than female voters per se.
horseshoe7
Sep 1 2008, 5:18 pm
then if it's only me doing the attacking i suppose you are saying you don't mind if I point out, like Bell the Cat has also done, when you are being condescending. that's not to attack, but a request to play fair. ok?
thefirelane
Sep 1 2008, 5:30 pm
More f'ing brilliance from McCain's pick:
Here is Palin's response to a candidate questionnaire for the Alaska 2006 gubernatorial race:
QUOTE
11. Are you offended by the phrase “Under God” in the Pledge of Allegiance? Why or why not?
SP: Not on your life. If it was good enough for the founding fathers, its good enough for me and I’ll fight in defense of our Pledge of Allegiance
For those not up on American history, the Pledge of Allegiance was written in 1892, and "under god" wasn't added until 1954
And one wonders why there are no babies for couples to adopt?
Jules Winnfield
Sep 1 2008, 5:47 pm
Wow. Palin is generating a lot of animosity from some people, despite her relative insignificance. I wonder why?
kitty_kat
Sep 1 2008, 5:54 pm
Because obviously as more and more people are seeing the effort for what it is. And they are understanding what she is all about, and what she stands for, so naturally they are seeing her for the poor choice of a VP for the Nation.
Expaticus
Sep 1 2008, 5:55 pm
QUOTE
The Republican vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin has announced that her 17-year-old daughter is pregnant, in an announcement intended to knock down rumors by liberal bloggers that Palin faked her own pregnancy to cover up for her child.
Uhhh ... knocking down rumors by revealing her 17-year-old daughter is knocked up.
How can this not be a disaster? Goes to character. Will keeping the baby trump premarital sex with the god botherers? Wow, this is getting exciting!
kitty_kat
Sep 1 2008, 6:05 pm
QUOTE
"The despicable rumors that have been spread by liberal blogs, some even with Barack Obama's name in them, is a real anchor around the Democratic ticket, pulling them down in the mud in a way that certainly juxtaposes themselves against their 'campaign of change,'" a senior aide said.
This kills me ... because it was reportedly a rumor started long before she was even considered a VP for McCain by her own neighbors in Alaska. Just so happens that with Palin in the spotlight, her privacy just went out the window.
But naturally, again, the GOP ticket will make it a case of the dirty Dems. These people are crazy I tell ya! Especially since the Obama campaign has even gone out of their way to avoid the dirty issues.
Obama to ask his donors to help storm victims Associated Press - August 31, 2008 1:33 PM ET LIMA, Ohio (AP)
QUOTE
GOP convention turns to plea for hurricane aid AP 49 minutes ago ST. PAUL, Minn
I ask, who's leading who?
Fribble
Sep 1 2008, 6:28 pm
QUOTE (Expaticus @ Sep 1 2008, 6:41 pm)
Palin will become a 44-year-old grandmother right after the election. Guess they'll really have the trailer trash vote completely sewn up.
This may have been meant as a joke, but I actually agree. As a winning tactic, perhaps it wasn't too bad a move. Too bad a civics exam isn't required of all voters. What a mess.
So, the Democrats are fielding a presidential candidate with an Ivy-league-educated wife and two cute kids, and a VP candidate who lost a wife and child in a car wreck but who bounced back.
The Republicans are fielding a presidential candidate who was a documented philanderer who abandandoned the car wreck-damaged wife who waited for him whilst he was in a prison camp for years, and a VP candidate who's married to a snowmobile-racing no-college roughneck with whom she's had a litter of strangely-named kids, one of whom is now knocked up at 17.
Someone remind us which one is the "family values" party again.
From Spiegel: Apparently, once Palin was announced as McCain's VP, the Wiki site contents were altered to such a degree (and generated so much traffic) that Wiki eventually closed the site to any more additions or deletions.
cinzia
Sep 1 2008, 7:18 pm
People, people. Bristol is said to be pregnant. This may be true. She is said to be 5 months pregnant, which may or may not be accurate.
But if Bristol is, indeed, 5 months pregnant, she can't be Trig's mother. If she is less than 5 months pregnant, it's still possible.
I will mention again that in my view, Sarah Palin is obviously a poor parent. Which has no bearing on her otherwise stellar qualifications for Vice President of the most powerful nation on Earth.
Alaska Governor Sarah Palin, newly picked as Republican John McCain's running mate, has revealed that her 17-year-old daughter is pregnant.
Mrs Palin, a social conservative who is opposed to abortion, said in a statement her daughter Bristol would keep the child and marry its father. (...)
Mrs Palin and her husband Todd said in a statement: "Bristol and the young man she will marry are going to realise very quickly the difficulties of raising a child, which is why they will have the love and support of our entire family."
Bristol is reportedly five months pregnant and is due to give birth in late December.
Advisers to the McCain campaign said they had known about the pregnancy before offering Mrs Palin the vice-presidential nomination.
So, the Democrats are fielding a presidential candidate with an Ivy-league-educated wife and two cute kids, and a VP candidate who lost a wife and child in a car wreck but who bounced back.
The Republicans are fielding a presidential candidate who was a documented philanderer who abandandoned the car wreck-damaged wife who waited for him whilst he was in a prison camp for years, and a VP candidate who's married to a snowmobile-racing no-college roughneck with whom she's had a litter of strangely-named kids, one of whom is now knocked up at 17.
Someone remind us which one is the "family values" party again.
too funny. This race is good enough for the Jerry Springer show! Yeah, family values... mm hmm.
(great quote from Rock, btw -- I saw him live in Oakland and he was OUTRAGEOUS!
moctoj2
Sep 1 2008, 7:23 pm
Well at least Mummy knows how to use a shotgun. It will come in handy during the wedding. This is a train wreck. I bet Obama is jumping for joy.
Expaticus
Sep 1 2008, 7:29 pm
QUOTE (cinzia @ Sep 1 2008, 8:18 pm)
People, people. Bristol is said to be pregnant. This may be true. She is said to be 5 months pregnant, which may or may not be accurate.
But if Bristol is, indeed, 5 months pregnant, she can't be Trig's mother. If she is less than 5 months pregnant, it's still possible.
Gee whiz ... do you really think that if she were pregnant once, had her public figure mother go through a massive charade, and then popped out a Downs Syndrome child that she would then be allowed to go out and get pregnant a second time?
There are enough photos showing Sarah pregnant, and there's a super-low Downs probability for a 16-year-old. End of conspiracy theory.
Isn't having a VP candidate with an admitted unmarried, underaged pregnant daughter enough? I'm flabbergasted that this isn't being discussed here more in the past 90 minutes ... or maybe people are simply as shocked as I.
Mrs Palin and her husband Todd said in a statement: "Bristol and the young man she will marry are going to realise very quickly the difficulties of raising a child, which is why they will have the love and support of our entire family."
If this woman had any shame at all, she would pull out of the race and take care of her disabled infant and pregnant daughter. This is the only argument a pro-family conservative-values person can reasonably hold at this point.
Think: what are the Palins going to do if Sarah gains office? Pull Bristol out of high school and move her and her new husband to DC? To do what? Or are they going to love and support her from DC while the happy couple remain in Alaska?
This is McCain's chance to convince Palin to pull out and pick a reasonable running mate. If he's smart, he'll take it.
mlovett
Sep 1 2008, 7:33 pm
" I'm flabbergasted that this isn't being discussed here more in the past 90 minutes ... or maybe people are simply as shocked as I."
I was raised Mormon. And while I no longer practice the religion, I *certainly* don't think one can get on soapbox platform of Family Values with a teenage daughter who is knocked up and "plans" to marry the father. What are HIS plans, I wonder?
If this woman had any shame at all, she would pull out of the race and take care of her disabled infant and pregnant daughter. This is the only argument a pro-family conservative-values person can reasonably hold at this point.
TOTALLY agree. As a LIBERAL mom of a 17 month old, I can't imagine having the energy or focus to be a "heartbeat" away from the Presidency. The woman needs to be a mother to her baby (Downs or not) as the baby is simply WAY too young to have mom gone all the time, and be a parent to her 17 year old pregnant daughter...who is going to need her more than ever before. The world does not need Sarah Palin as V.P., her daughter and son do need a mother. Politics needs to take a big back seat to where her life is right now.
They say McCain knew this info, which only leads me to believe he is certifiable.
This was my same feeling when Edwards ran. He needed to be a husband to his sick wife and father to his young children who were dealing with so much. When my mom had and died of cancer it was overwhelming, and I was a young adult.
Fribble
Sep 1 2008, 7:40 pm
QUOTE (Expaticus @ Sep 1 2008, 8:29 pm)
There are enough photos showing Sarah pregnant, and there's a super-low Downs probability for a 16-year-old. End of conspiracy theory.
Call me crazy, but when I looked at that photo of her daughter looking glum and vaguely pregnant, and the older son conspicuously absent... I thought... hmmmm: are there enough young ladies there in Alaska to go around, or might a strapping young lad, son of a powerful local woman, be tempted to sample from his own admittedly good-looking gene pool??
Crazy, right? But it would explain those wonky chromosomes in the Down's baby.