TT logo
You are viewing a low-graphics version of this page. Click the headline to view full version:

U.S. Presidential Election 2008

McCain-Palin vs. Obama-Biden

Toytown Germany > Discussion forum > Themes > International affairs
Pages: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152
gatzke
QUOTE (BattalionBoy @ Aug 26 2008, 9:12 am) *
Interesting convention watching those Democrats inaugurate another dead duck for a leader – what a bunch of losers (last time it was "shoot them in the back" Kerry). Just wait until the photos of Osama Obama at Mecca with his Indonesian Muslim stepfather leak out. I think the Republicans are waiting to release these a few weeks before the actual presidential election.

Quick poll, what will get media play after BHO is the official candidate?
  1. Michelle's whitey tape
  2. BHO bashing america from Kenya while supporting his cousin
  3. Biden family lobby issues
  4. Sketchy BHO mentor
  5. More on Biden plagarism
  6. Some racist Biden quotes
  7. Sketchy BHO deals with ACORN
  8. Details on the BHO forgotten brother
  9. Illegal donations to BHO from abroad
  10. Something new about BHOs support for PBAs
  11. Ayers connections
  12. Redzko connections
  13. Something else (photos at Mecca? BHOs koran notes? Michelle's thesis?)
Don't try to knock these down, we have seen most of the arguments against or admit some are just kooky out there.

What do you think will get pushed in the media over the next 3 months?

Same for McCain
  1. Age
  2. Health
  3. Houses
  4. First wife
  5. Culpability in Forrestal accident
  6. Overplaying POW card
  7. Racism (??)
  8. Some sketchy story about Cindy (KK, I never saw a link on this one)
  9. Affair innuendo (or fact)
  10. Ties to Bush
  11. Keating 5
  12. Propensity for sex with aliens
  13. Something else?

I think there may be something in the Ayers connection for BHO or maybe the Biden family lobby story.

For McCain, he may get hit for pulling out the POW every day.
horseshoe7
In the search of unbiased information, if that's at all possible, can someone quickly explain C-SPAN and C-SPAN 2 ?

I've got both of them over the net, and at the moment (perhaps purely because of the convention right now), CSPAN looks like the Dem channel, and CSPAN 2 the Rep channel.

Is that generally true? If so, do you watch both?
eurovol
Funny how you have all those links to bogus shit at the ready. As you have shown by that, the "right" will push them all and insinuate until their noses grow a mile long.

It will be age versus perceived inexperience. It will be about the economy stupid. It will be less and less about Iraq due to Bush caving in (and by so doing helping McCain) on a timeline. It will be about individual states and the electoral college chess match while failing miserably to show Obama's simpler game of electoral college checkers.

That is my prediction.
gatzke
QUOTE (horseshoe7 @ Aug 26 2008, 2:48 pm) *
In the search of unbiased information, if that's at all possible, can someone quickly explain C-SPAN and C-SPAN 2 ?

I've got both of them over the net, and at the moment (perhaps purely because of the convention right now), CSPAN looks like the Dem channel, and CSPAN 2 the Rep channel.

Is that generally true? If so, do you watch both?

Ameris don't watch either!

Way too boring. Even more boring than CNN.
cinzia
Anyone who doesn't believe what I wrote yesterday about Hillary being damned if she does support Obama, and damned if she doesn't, in Obama supporters' eyes, take it from today's Washington Post editorial page:

QUOTE
If there is a political job more fraught with peril than running to become the next commander in chief, surely it is being cast as cheerleader in chief.

Hillary Clinton will be damned if she looks too methodically perfect, too much the purveyor of practiced routine and not enough the cheery personification of enthusiasm. She'll also be damned if she's too exuberant, too obviously raising her voice in unbridled exhortation for the team. She will either be deemed too cool or all-too-cagily warm.

Clinton can't win tonight. But then, she knows that.

. . .

But it is usually the job of the party nominee to build unity once a vanquished rival has conceded and made the right gestures. Unless the loser happens to be a woman. Then it's just like high school, and she must do the work.
gatzke
QUOTE (eurovol @ Aug 26 2008, 2:49 pm) *
It will be age versus perceived inexperience. It will be about the economy stupid. It will be less and less about Iraq due to Bush caving in (and by so doing helping McCain) on a timeline. It will be about individual states and the electoral college chess match while failing miserably to show Obama's simpler game of electoral college checkers.

I agree. Iraq is going out of play. The media can do age and experience without ruffling too many feathers.

Is inexperience the new code word for black? "He is articulate but inexperienced." I just saw a story that maybe race will actually play a role, since some people will have problems voting that way. Who'd a thunk that in America?

I know the bridges were burned, but a BHO+HRC or HRC+BHO ticket would have been a winner IMHO.
eurovol
Ah yes, an editorial from you perhaps?
eurovol
QUOTE (gatzke @ Aug 26 2008, 2:56 pm) *
I know the bridges were burned, but a BHO+HRC or HRC+BHO ticket would have been a winner IMHO.

Yes, but the Administration and the Country would have been the losers. Too many cooks spoil the broth!
MajorBummer
Aaaargh! ohmy.gif Somebody wanted to kill Obama!! FBI looking into apparent plot to kill Obama in Denver (German article)
English article
gatzke
I actually saw this on dailykos. They were apparently scheduled to stay in the stinky hotel where the bust went down, but they moved to get into a cleaner place...
BattalionBoy
I bet Hillary is behind this. Cant trust the Clinton gang.
cinzia
I was in downtown St. Paul last night, right across the street from the Excel Energy Center where the Republicans are holding their shindig next week, and I saw lots of shady-looking characters lurking around. Casing the joint, no doubt. ph34r.gif

Yup, eurovol, I'm really Marie Coco. cinzia is my mild-mannered alter ego.
moctoj2
QUOTE (BattalionBoy @ Aug 26 2008, 3:13 pm) *
I bet Hillary is behind this.

Ya know, she would be my first suspect if something/anything happened to Obama. She has the most to gain by taking him out. Not even McCain has much to gain by taking him out, but the Clintons? They have EVERYTHING to gain by taking him out.
kitty_kat
And McCain has had death threats as well...

Notice the Men In Suits

Has there ever been an election year when the candidates haven't had to be concerned about security?
moctoj2
QUOTE (horseshoe7 @ Aug 26 2008, 2:48 pm) *
explain C-SPAN and C-SPAN 2 ?

Here's the Wiki link page - Wiki

QUOTE
All programs on the 3 C-SPAN's are unedited, uncensored and commercial free, and with very few voice over announcements.
kitty_kat
QUOTE (gatzke @ Aug 26 2008, 2:56 pm) *
I agree. Iraq is going out of play. The media can do age and experience without ruffling too many feathers.

Is inexperience the new code word for black? "He is articulate but inexperienced." I just saw a story that maybe race will actually play a role, since some people will have problems voting that way. Who'd a thunk that in America?

I know the bridges were burned, but a BHO+HRC or HRC+BHO ticket would have been a winner IMHO.

Obviously not ... otherwise 'traditional family values' would be shorthand for adultery. Makes no sense does it.
You're from Alabama ... so I recongize you may project a lot of southern attitudes ... one of the foregoing problems with Americans.
gatzke
QUOTE (moctoj2 @ Aug 26 2008, 3:15 pm) *
Ya know, she would be my first suspect if something/anything happened to Obama. She has the most to gain by taking him out. Not even McCain has much to gain by taking him out, but the Clintons? They have EVERYTHING to gain by taking him out.

Think they will "Foster" him?

Those were nutjob nazis (as opposed to your normal everyday nazis I guess).

Plus they were Meth heads, not the high-class coke preferred by BHO.
Jules Winnfield
QUOTE (kitty_kat @ Aug 26 2008, 3:24 pm) *
so I recongize you may project a lot of southern attitudes ... one of the foregoing problems with Americans.

What a crock of pompous horseshit. Southerners, Clinton supporters... Anyone else you'd like to remove from the democratic process?
gatzke
QUOTE (kitty_kat @ Aug 26 2008, 3:24 pm) *
Obviously not ... since you asked.
You're from Alabama ... so I recongize you may project a lot of southern attitudes ... one of the foregoing problems with Americans.

Don't stick all the racism on the South. There have been plenty of problems up North too. Irish and Italian, Catholics and Jews, etc. Plus out west with Native Americans and and Mexicans. Cubans in Miami. And Canadians. Everybody hates them biggrin.gif

BTW, I am still pulling for Condi as veep. I know it won't happen and I know it is probably the wrong choice, but I can dream.

One way to get rid of stereotype is to have the stereotype be obviously incorrect. Most blacks vote dem, BHO is dem in the tradition of Jessie Jackson, stereotypes will remain no matter the outcome.
kitty_kat
If there was ever any notion that Hillary has the power to do more... one need only take a glimse at the behind the scenes action.

Tensions behind the Scenes

QUOTE
Some senior Obama supporters are irritated at how they perceive the Clintons fanned — or at a minimum failed to douse — stories that she was not even vetted as a possible vice presidential nominee. This is because she told Obama she preferred not to go through the rigorous process of document production unless she was really a serious contender, an Obama associate noted


QUOTE
A prominent Obama backer said some of Clinton’s lieutentants negotiating with the Obama team are “bitter enders” who presume that, rather than the Clintons reconciling themselves to Obama’s victory, it is up to Obama to accommodate them.

In fact, some senior veterans of Clinton’s presidential campaign do believe this.

But the good thing is that people are moving forward...despite.
Clinton Supporters Warming To Obama

QUOTE
Most Clinton backers acknowledge they’ll inevitably support the Illinois senator for whom they came all the way to Denver.
Jules Winnfield
The fact that she wasn't seriously taken into consideration is unacceptable in itself.
gatzke
QUOTE (kitty_kat @ Aug 26 2008, 3:32 pm) *
If there was ever any notion that Hillary has the power to do more... one need only take a glimse at the behind the scenes action.
Tensions behind the Scenes

QUOTE
This is because she told Obama she preferred not to go through the rigorous process of document production unless she was really a serious contender, an Obama associate noted

You have used this quote multiple times.

The way I read this, BHO never had her as a "serious contender" so they never asked.

Don't blame her for backing out, blame BHO for not stepping up and considering her "seriously".

This is just as insulting as not having her on the list at all. How could she NOT be a serious contender after winning a majority of the popular vote* (* if you count MI)
kitty_kat
QUOTE (gatzke @ Aug 26 2008, 3:31 pm) *
One way to get rid of stereotype is to have the stereotype be obviously incorrect. Most blacks vote dem, BHO is dem in the tradition of Jessie Jackson, stereotypes will remain no matter the outcome.

If the sterotype is incorrect, then why would you presume to equate race with a persons perceived inexperience?
Bell the cat
QUOTE (Jules Winnfield @ Aug 26 2008, 2:35 pm) *
The fact that she wasn't seriously taken into consideration is unacceptable in itself.

why? She and her husband have been embroiled in so many dodgy doings in the past that Hilary would be a tainted candidate in any case. If she had won the nomination the pall of sleaze would have dragged her down. I guess Obama did not want to be dragged down too so Clinton would not have been in the running. Besides Obama, as presidential candidate has a responsibility to choose a running mate who reflects what the American people want and not just what the fundamentalist Clinton-nutters want.
kitty_kat
QUOTE (gatzke @ Aug 26 2008, 3:39 pm) *
You have used this quote multiple times.

The way I read this, BHO never had her as a "serious contender" so they never asked.

Don't blame her for backing out, blame BHO for not stepping up and considering her "seriously".

This is just as insulting as not having her on the list at all. How could she NOT be a serious contender after winning a majority of the popular vote* (* if you count MI)

And yet there are still some that think Obama is to blame for Hillary's lost.

Um, remember that meeting some months back when just her and Obama met face to face, no advisors or media in the room, before she conceeded the nomination to Obama? (Because afterall, he had the delegate count needed to win) What do you think they discussed? The theory is that it had something to do with Hillary's debts (and how much Obama would assist her with -- him being the bad guy 'n all) ...and/or what role she would play at the DNC (a pretty prominent one...as the Convention line up is published). I remember the reporting of it vividly.

In the DNC, it's not the popular vote that gets the nod... it's the delegate count. Want to change the process, join the DNC and make the changes possible.

Hillary supporters have yet to recongize this, although I hold out hope.
cinzia
Timing is everything. Hillary was apparently told just after her kinda-concession speech, suspending her campaign, that she would not be considered for the VP slot. I think she deserved to take a break from the campaign trail at that point, don't you?

I don't have a problem with Hillary not getting the VP nod, myself. I still believe she'll find something more useful to do with her time.

As for your quote, KK:

QUOTE
A prominent Obama backer said some of Clinton’s lieutentants negotiating with the Obama team are “bitter enders” who presume that, rather than the Clintons reconciling themselves to Obama’s victory, it is up to Obama to accommodate them.

In fact, some senior veterans of Clinton’s presidential campaign do believe this.

Well, yeah, it is up to Obama to accommodate them. They are a large chunk of the party.
Jules Winnfield
biggrin.gif Just wait until the shit hits Saint Obama's fan! You won't even know what hit him...

Uhmm... I don't think that he had an obligation to pick her, however the lengths that he has gone to snub her and the Clinton legacy are particularly cheap and will cost him dearly in the long run.

He certainly had a responsibility, both personally and politically (i.e, "professionally"), to take into consideration a candidate who won 18 million votes and who he was not even able to finish off until the very end of the primary process thanks in large part to backroom politicking.
kitty_kat
QUOTE (cinzia @ Aug 26 2008, 3:59 pm) *
As for your quote, KK:
Well, yeah, it is up to Obama to accommodate them. They are a large chunk of the party.

It's that arrogance, you realize, that gets Hillary supporters into trouble.
gatzke
QUOTE (kitty_kat @ Aug 26 2008, 3:50 pm) *
If the sterotype is incorrect, then why would you presume to equate race with a persons perceived inexperience?

Years ago, AAs in the states were not generally well-educated. Being articulate was atypical. Now Biden calling Barack "articulate" was played as a racist insult.

Now BHO is described as "inexperienced". He nearly called Clarence Thomas "inexperienced". Perhaps this is entering the lexicon as a new racist slur?

If you ask where would BHO be if he were white, you are labeled a racist. This is along the same vein as "inexperience", as in he got to this position without the requisite experience possibly due to quotas or other measures.

I honestly was trying to make light of this as possible newspeak. Go ahead and blame it on my southern sensibilities, you damn yankee.

BTW, where is a link to that Cindy McCain dirt? You teased but never delivered...
Jules Winnfield
QUOTE (kitty_kat @ Aug 26 2008, 3:59 pm) *
In the DNC, it's not the popular vote that gets the nod... it's the delegate count. Want to change the process, join the DNC and make the changes possible.

More Camp Nobama Grade A HORSESHIT. When Obama was behind in the delegate count, his acolytes were screaming bloody murder as they were convinced that the "establishment" candidate would get the nomination in spite of what the "people" had voted for. When the tables were turned, they suddenly changed tactics and started to preach about playing by the rules and the importance of delegates. I mean, please.
gatzke
QUOTE (kitty_kat @ Aug 26 2008, 4:05 pm) *
It's that arrogance, you realize, that get's Hillary supporters into trouble.

It's that arrogance that makes me wonder why they would want to stay with the DNC.

HRC PUMAs are probably mostly female. I think the main issue many women consider is abortion.

I thought I read McCain would leave it up to the states to decide. I doubt another SCOTUS appointee would swing Roe, but I am not a judicial scholar.

Obama is the other extreme, effectively voting against bills that would require medical care for botched abortion babies.

Maybe McCain can pull more (some) PUMAs since he is a little more centrist than BHO?
gatzke
QUOTE (Jules Winnfield @ Aug 26 2008, 4:06 pm) *
More Camp Nobama Grade A HORSESHIT. When Obama was behind in the delegate count, his acolytes were screaming bloody murder as they were convinced that the "establishment" candidate would get the nomination in spite of what the "people" had voted for. When the tables were turned, they suddenly changed tactics and started to preach about playing by the rules and the importance of delegates. I mean, please.

Not to mention the superdelegate mess. And caucuses? What the heck does TX do?

The Dem primary was a disaster. State parties could not be held in line, rules and penalties were all screwed up, they beat themselves to death and spent millions. However, fun to watch at times!

The Pubs did a good thing with FL and MI. You get half the delegates for screwing around. Everyone is on the ballots. Your vote is counted (partially).
moctoj2
I believe a complete overhaul is needed. Make all primaries on the same day, all a vote not caucases, and have the primary in March.
Edit: Oh and all open primaries. None of this declare your party crap.
kitty_kat
QUOTE (Jules Winnfield @ Aug 26 2008, 4:06 pm) *
More Camp Nobama Grade A HORSESHIT. When Obama was behind in the delegate count, his acolytes were screaming bloody murder as they were convinced that the "establishment" candidate would get the nomination in spite of what the "people" had said. When the tables were turned, they suddenly changed tactics and started to preach about playing by the rules and the importance of delegates. I mean, please.

rolleyes.gif a little disgruntled huh?
Why accept the reality of the matter when you're hellbent on believing the b.s being fed to you by the spin doctors?

Face it, Obama had to fight and fight hard for his delegates, but he followed the rules all along. Contrast that with Clinton, who figured the 'establishment' would give her a nod regardless. Get over it already. Obama had the winning strategy and won himself a spot in Denver.
gatzke
QUOTE (moctoj2 @ Aug 26 2008, 4:19 pm) *
I believe a complete overhaul is needed. Make all primaries on the same day, all a vote not caucases, and have the primary in March.
Edit: Oh and all open primaries. None of this declare your party crap.

This is the stupidest post I have seen in the last ten minutes.

The whole point of having some small states early is very democratic, so that the guys with little funding have a chance to get some traction. Having super Tuesday or every state early on would end up being a battle of the big well-funded guys.

Open primaries? Open for what? In America, we have two parties... Why call it a primary then? Isn't that just an election?

QUOTE (kitty_kat @ Aug 26 2008, 4:20 pm) *
Face it, Obama had to fight and fight hard for his delegates, but he followed the rules all along. Contrast that with Clinton, who figured the 'establishment' would give her a nod. Get over it already. Obam had the winning strategy and that's why he'll be at the podium in Denver.

HRC also shot herself in the foot. She was in the media looking like an idiot with that stupid story about sniper fire.

BHO seemed charismatic and without negative history.

KK, where is that story on Cindy McCain?
kitty_kat
QUOTE (Bell the cat @ Aug 26 2008, 3:51 pm) *
why? She and her husband have been embroiled in so many dodgy doings in the past that Hilary would be a tainted candidate in any case. If she had won the nomination the pall of sleaze would have dragged her down. I guess Obama did not want to be dragged down too so Clinton would not have been in the running. Besides Obama, as presidential candidate has a responsibility to choose a running mate who reflects what the American people want and not just what the fundamentalist Clinton-nutters want.

Thumps up and yea.
moctoj2
QUOTE (gatzke @ Aug 26 2008, 4:24 pm) *
This is the stupidest post I have seen in the last ten minutes.

Open primaries? Open for what?

Bite me. In my home state of Indiana - you must declare a party in the primary. That shuts out Independents like me. I say - open it up so that you don't have to declare a party. period.
Conquistador
QUOTE (kitty_kat @ Aug 26 2008, 3:24 pm) *
You're from Alabama ... so I recongize you may project a lot of southern attitudes ... one of the foregoing problems with Americans.

Very ignorant thing to say. Would you also say that to eurovol (a proud Tenneessean)? unsure.gif

QUOTE (moctoj2 @ Aug 26 2008, 4:19 pm) *
I believe a complete overhaul is needed. Make all primaries on the same day, all a vote not caucases, and have the primary in March.
Edit: Oh and all open primaries. None of this declare your party crap.

This would be a rare point of agreement between us.

BTW, moctoj, I can't figure out why you keep watching a news channel you hate so much if it's that painful for you. One other thing- given some of your previous posts, it looks as though you are the sort of voter that economic demagoguery is aimed at.
gatzke
QUOTE (moctoj2 @ Aug 26 2008, 4:27 pm) *
Bite me. In my home state of Indiana - you must declare a party in the primary. That shuts out Independents like me. I say - open it up so that you don't have to declare a party. period.

How hard is it to pick a candidate, then declare a party? You aren't bound in the election and you can change the next time around.

Many people did it this year for Operation Chaos from what I hear.

If you are really independent, you probably support some fringe party that never has a primary, they just put up a sacrificial lamb. So why complain?

Although, your open primary may be a good idea in some ways. I thought people should vote for Colbert. Some could vote twice (since he was trying to get on the Dem and Pub tix in SC. I think they have primaries on different days). He could never get on the ballot AFAIK.
moctoj2
Look, in Indiana you can't vote in the primary unless you declare a party. You get either a republican ticket or democratic ticket. I've never wanted to vote in a primary before this year because of that rule. I registered as a Dem so that I could vote in the primary this year as a Democratic Abroad. That doesn't mean that I will vote a straight ticket in November.
And, Conky, you ask why I watch Fox? Because I didn't find the C Span feed until later. You see, we have Sky digital and the only live feed of American News is Fox (argh). Sure we have CNN Int'l and BBC Int'l but sometimes, I want a live feed on tv. The other news channels are Sky News (another UK news feed), CNBC (sometimes American live news feeds) and Al Jaheera (oh boy). Thankfully, BBC Parliment saved the day. Now I can sleep tonight and not worry I'm missing something.
moctoj2
QUOTE (Conquistador @ Aug 26 2008, 4:33 pm) *
One other thing- given some of your previous posts, it looks as though you are the sort of voter that economic demagoguery is aimed at.

What other posts? What are you implying?
kitty_kat
QUOTE (gatzke @ Aug 26 2008, 4:24 pm) *
KK, where is that story on Cindy McCain?

Here's short list

1. Criminial Felony charges from her charity (got out of serving jail time due to plea deal..payed a fine)
2. Plagerism charges (a little lie about some "family" recipes swiped from the Food Network...raises questions of integrity in the McCain camp)
3. Drug addict (admittedly.. no one knows for certain if this is still the case)
4. Half sister that was discovered and reported as saying 'she's angry at been hidden'
5. The nicely scripted dirty lie about Mother Teresa and the adobtion of her kid put a whole lot of people off
6. Her refusal to release tax returns raised eyebrows
7. Then there's the questionable aqusitions of Anheuser-Busch’s Budweiser and the plausible conflict of interest on McCain in alcohol restrictions/laws
8. Anheuser-Busch execs have also apparently been signing contracts and investing hundreds of millions in brewery operations in China and Vietnam
9. Of course the houses that she owns, but he shares with her (reportedly he shares only four)
10. James Hensley, Cindy's father is an ex-con and felon

That's just a start... hardly the Belle of the Ball.
kitty_kat
QUOTE (Conquistador @ Aug 26 2008, 4:33 pm) *
Very ignorant thing to say. Would you also say that to eurovol (a proud Tenneessean)?

I applyed my statement to gatzke for a reason. Don't think you can pop in and stir up shit. rolleyes.gif
Conquistador
QUOTE (kitty_kat @ Aug 26 2008, 5:17 pm) *
Here's short list

1. Criminial Felony charges from her charity (got out of serving jail time due to plea deal..payed a fine)
2. Plagerism charges (a little lie about some "family" recipes swiped from the Food Network...raises questions of integrity in the McCain camp)
3. Drug addict (admittedly.. no one knows for certain if this is still the case)
4. Half sister that was discovered and reported as saying 'she's angry at been hidden'
5. The nicely scripted dirty lie about Mother Teresa put a whole lot of people off
6. Her refusal to release tax returns raised eyebrows
7. Then there's the questionable aqusitions of Anheuser-Busch’s Budweiser and the plausible conflict of interest on McCain in alcohol restrictions/laws
8. Anheuser-Busch execs have also apparently been signing contracts and investing hundreds of millions in brewery operations in China and Vietnam
9. Of course the houses that she owns, but he shares with her (reportedly he shares only four)
10. James Hensley, Cindy's father is an ex-con and felon

That's just a start... hardly the Belle of the Ball.

Ho hum, the usual sort of stuff KK posts.

1. Don't know what that was about, but I wouldn't rely on your version of it.
2. Both Obama and Biden have been accused of plagiarism (Obama of a Deval Patrick speech and apparently Biden's was much more serious and the charge was accurate) Yet you go bonkers about recipes?
3. Obama has admitted previous drug use (one could also claim no one knows if this is still the case) CMC was addicted to painkillers.
4. Who is the half-sister and who "hid" her? After your defense of Obama for ignoring his half-brother living in poverty, how can you criticize anyone else for their relationship to some half-sibling?
5. No idea what you are talking about here.
6. Why should she release her tax returns? Would you release yours? She is not a candidate, has never been one, and she keeps her financial affairs separate. Ever heard of privacy?
7. No idea what you are talking about here. Probably more innuendo.
8. What does that have to do with Cindy McCain? Why wouldn't Anheuser-Busch try to expand abroad? The company is going to be bought by a Belgian company, BTW.
9. So she owns houses- so what? Is she supposed to live in penury? I see no problem with home ownership. Let me guess- you see no problem with Obama's house dealings with Rezko, and Biden's with a credit card company executive?
10. Assuming that is true, what does that have to do with Cindy?

Of course, you provide no sources, KK, nor do you even try to substantiate your wild claim of TV networks being bribed to keep stuff silent about her.
eurovol
QUOTE (Jules Winnfield @ Aug 26 2008, 3:35 pm) *
The fact that she wasn't seriously taken into consideration is unacceptable in itself.

You wouldn't vote for her anyway so wtf do you care? rolleyes.gif
Conquistador
QUOTE (kitty_kat @ Aug 26 2008, 5:24 pm) *
I applyed my statement to gatzke for a reason. Don't think you can pop in and stir up shit.

No one needs to ask for permission to comment on a public forum, least of all from you. Just because you have an attitude doesn't mean you won't get called out on for making ignorant comments like this one:
QUOTE (kitty_kat @ Aug 26 2008, 3:24 pm) *
You're from Alabama ... so I recongize you may project a lot of southern attitudes ... one of the foregoing problems with Americans.

So, KK, what was your reason for making this statement, and what were you trying to say? What are "southern attitudes"?
Jules Winnfield
Uhhh... I voted for her in the primaries...
kitty_kat
QUOTE (Conquistador @ Aug 26 2008, 5:31 pm) *
Ho hum, the usual sort of stuff KK posts.

1. Don't know what that was about, but I wouldn't rely on your version of it.
2. Both Obama and Biden have been accused of plagiarism (apparently Biden's was much more serious and the charge was accurate)
3. Obama has admitted previous drug use (one could also claim no one knows if this is still the case) CMC was addicted to painkillers.
4. Who is the half-sister and who "hid" her? After your defense of Obama for ignoring his half-brother living in poverty, how can you criticize anyone else for their relationship to some half-sibling?
5. No idea what you are talking about here.
6. Why should she release her tax returns? Would you release yours? She is not a candidate, has never been one, and she keeps her financial affairs separate. Ever heard of privacy?
7. No idea what you are talking about here. Probably more innuendo.
8. What does that have to do with Cindy McCain? Why wouldn't Anheuser-Busch try to expand abroad? The company is going to be bought by a Belgian company, BTW.
9. So she owns houses- so what? Is she supposed to live in penury? I see no problem with home ownership. Let me guess- you see no problem with Obama's house dealings with Rezko, and Biden's with a credit card company executive?
10. Assuming that is true, what does that have to do with Cindy?

Of course, you provide no sources, KK, nor do you even try to substantiate your wild claim of TV networks being bribed to keep stuff silent about her.

I have neither the time nor the interest to hunt down specific articles for YOU. There's nothing I've writted here that hasn't been hot on the press for months. You need to start doing your homework. You can't expect the conservative airwaves to reveal what she's all about. dry.gif BTw, all reports lead to the ethics and questionable character that is plaguing the McCains and makes one take a second look at applying a vote to it.
Conquistador
That's rich, KK, coming from a person who has been caught lying about and misrepresenting McCain votes, doesn't always cite her sources, and has yet to substantiate claims such as TV networks being bribed. rolleyes.gif

Surely you should know where you got that stuff about McCain's wife. Scared to admit where you got it from? Or did you just make some of it up?

Even Michelle Obama dropped her attitude last night, if only for one speech. Maybe KK can eventually drop hers about Southerners and her other targets.
BattalionBoy
Michelle Osama made a speech at the convention last night she said her husband was a virgin when they married and his sexual suppression will probably surface at some time, like most cheese dick Democrats - however if he tries to cheat her she will whip his butt with a birch rod so hard he will be yelping and howling for his mummy.
Pages: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152
You are viewing a low fidelity version of this page. Click to view the full page.