TT logo
You are viewing a low-graphics version of this page. Click the headline to view full version:

U.S. Presidential Election 2008

McCain-Palin vs. Obama-Biden

Toytown Germany > Discussion forum > Themes > International affairs
Pages: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152
gatzke
QUOTE (eurovol @ Aug 12 2008, 8:22 pm) *
Dude, every "socialism" remark you make is repugnant and offensive. Mostly cause you don't even know what the meaning is. You use it as an insult. Look in the mirror before you make more judgments!

Again, I agree with eurovol. Socialism is repugnant and offensive.

At least in the US, being labeled a liberal is often a negative. Back on topic, BHO was the most liberal senator last year. Wonder how that will play in November?

Again, the reading I have done says socialism is like communism, but without total control of the economy. How is that in error?

How is BHO's platform different from the Communist party of the USA? Similar ideals, similar methods.

BTW, communism is also often seen as a negative thing in the US.
yanksavage
QUOTE (MonksTown @ Aug 12 2008, 2:48 pm) *
Oh yeah, I largely agree with BtC's analysis of what went wrong with East Germany too.
The Saumagen just didn't keep his wife in the dark, he deliberately fucked up the new states and left us in the west with the bill for it to ensure his place in the history books as "The Unity Chancellor".

<kotz>

Just curious MT. In your opinion, what action would help the East come out of it's economic problems? I would suggest tax incentives.
gatzke
QUOTE (yanksavage @ Aug 12 2008, 8:49 pm) *
I guess time will tell. But I stll hold to my guns that money is better spent in the hands of those who earn it.

You are obviously a radical, comrade.

Clearly, the government should have > 50% of your money. You can trust them to spend it wisely, they are the government.

As everyone knows, the constitution guarantees all Ameris healthcare, 6 weeks vacation, and public transit.
Bell the cat
QUOTE (yanksavage @ Aug 12 2008, 7:46 pm) *
And yea the economy is slower, but still strong compared to the continent.

this is no longer the case. Germany (2.7%,) France (2%) et al all currently forecast growth while the Irish economy is at a standstill
yanksavage
QUOTE (gatzke @ Aug 12 2008, 2:52 pm) *
You are obviously a radical, comrade.

Clearly, the government should have > 50% of your money. You can trust them to spend it wisely, they are the government.

As everyone knows, the constitution guarantees all Ameris healthcare, 6 weeks vacation, and public transit.

LOL gatzke your a riot. Well put. You made my day, nearly fell off my chair reading your post. Thanks.

Must get back on topic though.
yanksavage
QUOTE (Bell the cat @ Aug 12 2008, 2:54 pm) *
this is no longer the case. Germany (2.7%,) France (2%) et al all currently forecast growth while the Irish economy is at a standstill

Point well taken BTC. I actually meant unemployment figures though when i was making the comparison. I believe Ireland has an unemployment figure of ca 5% maybe slightly higher. The problem in Ireland is largely due to a fall of in construction. If the econmoy comes back, I believe building will start up again.
MonksTown
I don't know where people get the idea from that people who identify as socialists or communists or Marxists necessarily want the government or quasi governmental agencies to tax a regular working individuals income at a rate of greater than 50% ?

What could be done NOW to improve the situation in eastern Germany?
Education and infrastructure investment are the first things that spring to mind.
But, I don't really want to be in the game of playing of one set of workers against another to be honest.
eurovol
The US Government is a socialist institution that is democratically elected to form a Republic.

We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

The Constitution is truly a great document, but far too few people have read it or even understand it for themselves and far too many try to interpret it for the masses and their interpretations are not always in the best interest of the people. I am not talking Judges here, I am talking those that judge others.
yanksavage
QUOTE (MonksTown @ Aug 12 2008, 2:58 pm) *
I don't know where people get the idea from that people who identify as socialists or communists or Marxists necessarily want the government or quasi governmental agencies to tax a regular working individuals income at a rate of greater than 50% ?

What could be done NOW to improve the situation in eastern Germany?
Education and infrastructure investment are the first things that spring to mind.
But, I don't really want to be in the game of playing of one set of workers against another to be honest.

Has this not been already tried? I mean it has been 18 years.
Bell the cat
QUOTE (yanksavage @ Aug 12 2008, 7:50 pm) *
Just curious MT. In your opinion, what action would help the East come out of it's economic problems? I would suggest tax incentives.

for tax incentives to work you would have to have a skilled workforce in the east ready to accept work but one of the effects of rapid reunification is that anyone skilled or educated left for the west. Now many of these regions are so depressed and underskilled that it would be hard to attract a skilled workforce back and business in. The Länder in the East have actually tried this by massively reducing business rates and providing very generous grants for businesses that want to relocate to them. It has not been altogether successful.

A better strategy might be to home grow businesses in the east by investing in education and establishing regional venture managed funds targetted at start up businesses. But that would take a fairly long time to bear fruit.
yanksavage
QUOTE (eurovol @ Aug 12 2008, 2:59 pm) *
The US Government is a socialist institution that is democratically elected to form a Republic.

We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

The Constitution is truly a great document, but far too few people have read it or even understand it for themselves and far too many try to interpret it for the masses and their interpretations are not always in the best interest of the people. I am not talking Judges here, I am talking those that judge others.

I always interpreted the constitution as a documen that was meant to define our freedom and to proect those freedoms. Have never considered it to be a document that created a socialist institution at all. (Note: I'm not being provocative , just stating an opinion)
Bell the cat
QUOTE (yanksavage @ Aug 12 2008, 8:02 pm) *
Has this not been already tried? I mean it has been 18 years.

kind of. But a lot of the money for investment was poorly controlled soft money, which has a tendency to produce large unwieldy cash drains that fail. Which is why I think the German state should be investing in or even setting up its own venture managed funds. It has only done that to a very limited level to date and most of those funds are currently here in Bavaria or over in the Rheinland.
Bell the cat
QUOTE (eurovol @ Aug 12 2008, 7:59 pm) *
The US Government is a socialist institution that is democratically elected to form a Republic.

We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

The Constitution is truly a great document, but far too few people have read it or even understand it for themselves and far too many try to interpret it for the masses and their interpretations are not always in the best interest of the people. I am not talking Judges here, I am talking those that judge others.

I think I disagree completely with that. It is the kind of idiotic point that might be made with a flourish in a school debating competition but it lacks any real political insight and rather suggests you eurovol don't understand what socialism is either.
yanksavage
QUOTE (Bell the cat @ Aug 12 2008, 3:20 pm) *
kind of. But a lot of the money for investment was poorly controlled soft money, which has a tendency to produce large unwieldy cash drains that fail. Which is why I think the German state should be investing in or even setting up its own venture managed funds. It has only done that to a very limited level to date and most of those funds are currently here in Bavaria or over in the Rheinland.

Well, I certainly hope they do something. All my friends in Germany are very frustrated with their government and the years it has taken to rebuild the East. Of course, my company does enjoy the excellent engineers that have been coming to Atlanta over the past 12 years. At least our company is benefiting from the exudos of good talented engineers due to the economy. :lol

Note: just trying to lighten the mood here, no offense intended to anyone.
yanksavage
QUOTE (Bell the cat @ Aug 12 2008, 3:24 pm) *
I think I disagree completely with that. It is the kind of idiotic point that might be made with a flourish in a school debating competition but it lacks any real political insight and rather suggests you eurovol don't understand what socialism is either.

A fight betwem BTC and eurovol!! ohmy.gif Would love to watch, but must go to a meeting.
lilplatinum
QUOTE (yanksavage @ Aug 12 2008, 9:26 pm) *
Well, I certainly hope they do something. All my friends in Germany are very frustrated with their government and the years it has taken to rebuild the East. Of course, my company does enjoy the excellent engineers that have been coming to Atlanta over the past 12 years. At least our company is benefiting from the exudos of good talented engineers due to the economy. :lol

Note: just trying to lighten the mood here, no offense intended to anyone.

I dunno the pathetically weak American dollar has been made being paid in Euros quite beneficial in regards to my student loan payments, even with the higher tax rate.. At least I'm squeezing european money back into the American economy as opposed to Americans who invest abroad smile.gif
cinzia
QUOTE (yanksavage @ Aug 12 2008, 9:04 pm) *
I always interpreted the constitution as a documen that was meant to define our freedom and to proect those freedoms.

That's really just some of the Amendments, though. The rest pertains to how the government is to function.

Some of the clauses in the preamble could be interpreted as setting pretty social-minded goals: insuring domestic tranquillity (instead of wealth- and class-based tension, for example), promoting the general welfare (for everyone, not just those with a higher education), even establishing justice all open themselves to speculation about how egalitarian the founders imagined the new society would be.
cinzia
QUOTE (yanksavage @ Aug 12 2008, 9:26 pm) *
Well, I certainly hope they do something. All my friends in Germany are very frustrated with their government and the years it has taken to rebuild the East. Of course, my company does enjoy the excellent engineers that have been coming to Atlanta over the past 12 years. At least our company is benefiting from the exudos of good talented engineers due to the economy. :lol

Ah, engineers. Tax rate in Germany aside, engineers make a lot more money here than there. I suspect that anyone who tells you they resent the tax rate in Germany are planning to make a fat salary here, with full health insurance benefits just like back home, and then go back there to retire on their country's pension system. Maybe they'll even be sending their kids back to Germany for the cheaper university. Playing both sides of the field is all that is.

Not that I blame them. But claiming that the only reason they want to work in the US is because their taxes are too high in Germany strikes me as extremely disingenuous, when they also happen to make more money here, and everything else but food is cheaper here than in Germany.
gatzke
QUOTE (Bell the cat @ Aug 12 2008, 9:24 pm) *
I think I disagree completely with that. It is the kind of idiotic point that might be made with a flourish in a school debating competition but it lacks any real political insight and rather suggests you eurovol don't understand what socialism is either.

Idiotic point? Didn't you see the insightful post from ev about how republicans are actually communists?

At least he put a cite in that post, for once. Although his source may be dubious.

Left, super-left, and super-duper-left. I still don't get it and probably never will.
eurovol
The Constitution defined a democratically elected Republic where people, States and the Federal government had defined roles (with the Fed role being to provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare) and rights. The Federalists (very close to today's Republicans), didn't want a Bill of Rights and wanted to create a Federation of States where the States ruled and the Fed was weak. The Civil War further defined the Federal governments power over the States. Lincoln, being Repub in name and Dem at heart, didn't take advantage of the situation.
MonksTown
I'M frustrated at what the Saumagen did to the eastern states cos I'M bloody well paying for it.

Currency unification as it happenend, the wholesale asset striping of the eastern economic structure and a LOT of money that was squandered on large prestiege projects that slid into the back pockets of western industrial giants were all warned about, but the advice was willfully ignored.

An abuse of human rights it was, but there was a method behind the the East German stalinists keeping people behind walls and barbed wire, it was primarily about stopping an instant drain of the most skilled workers wheeas pensioners were free to leave the DDR at any time.

There are no quick fixes for the eastern states, steady progress is the best that can be hoped for.

But anyway, back to the US Presidential vote. smile.gif
eurovol
This is the latest in a long line of Republican garbage and smear tactics. This is an email that is currently being circulated. My father received this from a life long friend who obviously has gone insane. The personal note attached has been removed, but it made clear the insanity gripping my Country.

QUOTE
This is a matter of opinion but...

*******************************
A lot of Americans have become so insulated from reality that they imagine that America can suffer defeat without any inconvenience to themselves.

Pause a moment, reflect back.

These events are actual events from history..

They really happened!!!

Do you remember?

1. 1968 Bobby Kennedy was shot and killed by aMuslim male extremist.

2. In 1972 at the Munich Olympics, athletes were kidnapped and massacred by Muslim male extremists.

3. In 1979, the US embassy in Iran was taken over byMuslim male extremists.

4. During the 1980's a number of Americans were kidnapped in Lebanon by Muslim male extremists.

5. In 1983, the US Marine barracks in Beirut was blown up by Muslim male extremists.

6. In 1985 the cruise ship Achille Lauro was hijacked and a 70 year old American passenger was murdered and thrown overboard in his wheelchair by Muslim male extremists.

7. In 1985 TWA flight 847 was hijacked at Athens, and a US Navy diver trying to rescue passengers was murdered by Muslim male extremists.

8. In 1988 , Pan Am Flight 103 was bombed byMuslim male extremists.

9. In 1993 the World Trade Center was bombed the first time by Muslim male extremists.

10. In 1998, the US embassies in Kenya and Tanzaniawere bombed by Muslim male extremists.

11. On 9/11/01, four airliners were hijacked; two were used as missiles to take down the World Trade Centers and of the remaining two, one crashed into the US Pentagon and the other was diverted and crashed by the passengers. Thousands of people were killed by Muslim male extremists.

12. In 2002 the United States fought a war inAfghanistan against Muslim male extremists.

13. In 2002 reporter Daniel Pearl was kidnapped and murdered by-- you guessed it-- Muslim male extremists.

No, I really don't see a pattern here to justify profiling, do you? So, to ensure we Americans never offend anyone, particularly fanatics intent on killing us, airport security screeners will no longer be allowed to profile certain people... Absolutely No Profiling!

They must conduct random searches of 80-year-old women, little kids, airline pilots with proper identification, secret agents who are members of the President's security detail, 85-year old Congressmen with metal hips, and Medal of Honor winner and former Governor Joe Foss, but leave Muslim Males alone lest they be guilty of profiling.

And Now:
For the award winning Act of Stupidity Of all times the People of America want to elect, to the most Powerful position on the face of the Planet -- The Presidency of the United states of America ... A Muslim Male Extremist.

Have the American People completely lost their Minds, or just their Power of Reason???

I'm sorry but I refuse to take a chance on the 'unknown' candidate Obama...( who is about 1/3 mulium)

Let's send this to as many people as we can so that the Gloria Aldreds and other stupid attorneys along with Federal Justices that want to thwart common sense, feel ashamed of themselves -- if they have any such sense.

As the writer of the award winning story 'Forrest Gump' so aptly put it,
'Stupid Is As Stupid Does'

Each opportunity that you have to send it to a friend or media outlet...do it!
or just delete if you disagree.
Bell the cat
eurovol, that is frankly gobsmacking . ...
bohemka
My dad is cooler than your dad, eurovol. He got that e-mail at least six months ago.
cinzia
That doesn't surprise me at all. I used to get that kind of thing frequently from my own relatives before I actually started challenging them by Replying to All. I would then be removed from the distribution list, which tells you just about all you need to know about whether these people want to hear from alternative viewpoints.

Mass e-mails like this one will not find an audience among people who would ever consider voting for Obama anyway; they won't sway the outcome of the election.
Bell the cat
all it needs to do is sow doubt in the minds of just a small percentage of waverers cinzia, for it to have the desired political effect. Isn't there a poll of ex-Hilary supporters now switching to McCain with a proportion giving as a reason that they could not vote for a moslem?

Thing about propaganda is that it does not have to be plausable, it just has to be constant and persistent to have the desired effect . . .
cinzia
Haven't heard about the ex-Hillary supporters' poll.

I still think this is pretty harmless in terms of the big picture. This kind of e-mail promotes racism. Racists already have plenty of reasons not to vote for Obama; you're not going to add to their numbers via this kind of unintelligible e-mail.

Anyway, if you want to take the points about all the Muslim males terrorists seriously, you could just as well argue against electing a man as argue against electing a Muslim. Yet Hillary is no longer in the running.
eurovol
QUOTE (Bell the cat @ Aug 12 2008, 9:24 pm) *
rather suggests you eurovol don't understand what socialism is either.

No, I do. Do you? I would assume you do know that there are literally dozens of forms of socialism today and that they all evolved over the decades from core principles of human dignity and individual rights. Its like Liberals now wanting to call themselves Progressives when the original Progressives believed in free market trade.
eurovol
In the older Jewish communities of Florida they did a poll and the results were just as gobsmacking BTC. Even Bloomberg has gone to Florida to tell Jewish groups to not believe the lies and for Jewish leaders to come out and condemn the smears more strongly.
yanksavage
Items 1 through 13 are true, but the rest is rubbish. Politics is a nasty game.
eurovol
It would be more accurate to say 1-13 were committed by nutjobs and some were for religious nutjob reasons. I could compile a similar list of Christian nutjob perpetrators.
yanksavage
QUOTE (eurovol @ Aug 12 2008, 7:28 pm) *
It would be more accurate to say 1-13 were committed by nutjobs and some were for religious nutjob reasons. I could compile a similar list of Christian nutjob perpetrators.

The Orange Order should top your list then.

By the way, it's very late in Munich, off to bed with you, no story tonight, just off to bed, way past your bedtime. laugh.gif
gatzke
QUOTE (eurovol @ Aug 13 2008, 1:28 am) *
It would be more accurate to say 1-13 were committed by nutjobs and some were for religious nutjob reasons. I could compile a similar list of Christian nutjob perpetrators.

I would like to see your list. Please stick to the last 30 years, so no crusades, etc.
Bell the cat
1. 7 people killed by a bomb at Aldershot Barracks. Six of those killed were female ancillary workers. The seventh was a Roman Catholic priest. Bomb planted by white Christians 1972 (IRA)

2. 2 people killed and 127 injured by two car bombs in Dublin plated by white christians 1972 (Loyalists)

3. 9 people killed and 130 injured by 22 bombs in Belfast planted by white christians 1972 (IRA)

4. 5 people killed and 65 injured by a bombs planted in pubs by a group of white christians in Guildford 1974 (IRA)

5. 21 people killed and 181 injured by a bombs planted in pubs by a group of white christians in Birmingham 1974 (IRA)

6. 12 people killed in a coach of soldiers families on the M62 motorway by bomb planted by white christians 1974 (IRA)

7. 33 people and one unborn child killed across Ireland in a bombing spree perpetrated by white christians 1974 (UVF)

8. 3 members of the Miami Showband shot and killed by white christians in 1975 (UVF)

9. 12 people killed n a series of attacks in Northern Ireland by white christians in 1975 (UVF)

10. 5 people killed in a bomb attack in Dundalk, Co. Louth, Republic of Ireland by white christians in 1975 (Red Hand Comandos/UVF)

11. 10 protestant civilians killed by white christians in Northern Ireland 1976 (IRA)

12. British ambassador to Ireland and his secretary killed by a car bomb planted by white christians in 1976 (IRA)

13. 12 people killed a restaurant in Belfast 1978 by white christians (IRA)

and those are just a selection. In total over the years of conflict in Northern Ireland and mainland UK 3523 people lost their lives because of a fight inspired by two extreme interpretations of the christian religion and the sectarian struggle it caused. The last attack and deaths occurred in 2006. In total that is 549 more people than died in all the attacks on September 11 2001 in the USA.
gatzke
QUOTE (Bell the cat @ Aug 13 2008, 8:35 am) *
and those are just a selection. In total over the years of conflict in Northern Ireland and mainland UK 3523 people lost their lives because of a fight inspired by two extreme interpretations of the christian religion and the sectarian struggle it caused. The last attack and deaths occurred in 2006. In total that is 549 more people than died in all the attacks on September 11 2001 in the USA.

Maybe the US should invade Northern Ireland? They may need some liberating and regime change.

I am honestly fairly clueless on the struggles in Ireland. I thought it was more a political issue of pushing the UK influence out, not a religious battle or jihad.

I also thought the IRA generally tried to minimize civilian casualties.

I was thinking more Christian on Muslim issues, but point taken.
horseshoe7
QUOTE (yanksavage @ Aug 12 2008, 6:49 pm) *
http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=16860
Eurovol and other lefties can learn a lot from the above post. Enjoy

Going back to this post... I find the argumentation deeply flawed, though indeed I learned something. What I did learn is that the war on poverty was declared lost before it was ever given a chance to succeed. Let's look at simple numbers and do a thought experiment:

At the peak of its giving, apparently 2004, some $368billion went into poverty programs to 37m people. Do the math: 368b / 37m = about $10,000 per person. Now subtract administration costs, where a general rule of thumb for social work is that 1 worker is for 10 clients. Now you've got 3.7m workers, making from $30-60k per year. So, say now this $10000 is now like $8000, which is still ambitious as there are always more costs, and departmental budget waste (i.e. "oh, we have an extra $30,000 - gotta spend it this year on something, or they'll reduce our funding for next year."

So, you're telling me that even if the poor were given this money cash in hand that they'd have a chance?

BUT, what's worse is that this isn't paid out in money, it's paid out in services, as savage's article mentioned:

QUOTE
"... Medicaid, food stamps, supplementary security income, temporary assistance to needy families, child day-care payments, child nutrition payments, foster care, adoption assistance, and health insurance for children..."

This is almost like the rat getting the food pellet. They're not even given opportunities to try to use whatever money they have wisely, from what it sounds like. They have to wait around and be given the handout. You can see why it turns into a culture of dependence.

All I'm saying is it's not fair to declare war, not throw enough resources at it, then say "we made a valiant effort but these people simply can't be conquered."

Trillions of dollars were spent on the military in a more or less pointless mission in Iraq. That's a way of saying, the US gov't preferred to spend more money, risk american lives, destabilize an entire region, not to mention undermine the UN and ruin the US reputation abroad, to overthrow one despot (of many worldwide) and to get the contracts to rebuild, and get their hands wet in the mid-east oil business, and didn't care about it's own people below the poverty line, or for those who are refused treatment in hospitals (due to the lack of healthcare reforms that favour the patient). AND, the world is arguably less secure, and religious tensions are probably at an all-time high.

That's the way I see it. America could solve alot of its problems if it wasn't so busy spending money on defence.
gatzke
QUOTE (horseshoe7 @ Aug 13 2008, 10:15 am) *
That's the way I see it. America could solve alot of its problems if it wasn't so busy spending money on defence.

National defense is the one thing that actually is in the US constitution. Again, national health care is not.

Without sustained military expenditures, the US military will fall to European standards.

Who will be able to stand against Russia or China if needed? Would you rather live with the US as allies or under oppressive rule?

I love the fact that we have 11 active super carriers. That is 10 more than anyone else.

I told my wife that and she was surprised we did not have more. Good thing we are building some more to keep her happy...
lilplatinum
QUOTE (gatzke @ Aug 13 2008, 10:34 am) *
National defense is the one thing that actually is in the US constitution. Again, national health care is not.

Which article or ammendment regards national defense? The framers intent was to have a weak standing military and a citizen militia, not spend trillions of federal tax dollars invading other countries. I'm sure they could wiggle health care into the interstate commerce clause, its how the feds have usurped so much other power.

QUOTE
The highest number to which a standing army can be carried in any country does not exceed one hundredth part of the souls, or one twenty-fifth part of the number able to bear arms. This portion would not yield, in the United States, an army of more than twenty-five or thirty thousand men. To these would be opposed a militia amounting to near half a million citizens with arms in their hands, officered by men chosen from among themselves, fighting for their common liberties and united and conducted by governments possessing their affections and confidence. It may well be doubted whether a militia thus circumstanced could ever be conquered by such a proportion of regular troops. Besides the advantage of being armed, it forms a barrier against the enterprises of ambition, more insurmountable than any which a simple government of any form can admit of. The governments of Europe are afraid to trust the people with arms. If they did, the people would surely shake off the yoke of tyranny, as America did. Let us not insult the free and gallant citizens of America with the suspicion that they would be less able to defend the rights of which they would be in actual possession than the debased subjects of arbitrary power would be to rescue theirs from the hands of their oppressors.

- James Madison
horseshoe7
Of course, because if a document was written in 1776 there's no reason to change your thinking. Well, in 1776 national defence was important, so it should always remain that way. In 1776 modern medicine didn't exist, so why would you need healthcare? Neither did the lightbulb, it's incredible americans have those.

What you fail to realise, is that with small governments, the "new" governments will be corporations taking their place. I mean, only corporations have control in different countries (under the same banner, or "flag" if you will).

Military domination will be or is becoming a relic of the past. This process began with the dropping of the atomic bomb. Economic domination is the modern means of societal control.

Standing up to Russia or China? If you provoke someone, they tend to fight back. The idea of diplomacy is to not provoke. As you hint to, the amount of overkill in the US military is crazy. The US Military of 20 years ago could still kick anyone's ass, so why do they keep dumping piles of money into new tech, etc.?

But anyway, with the tone in your last post, it's all too easy why many countries dislike the US. That sense of non-cooperation is what annoys people.

let's get back to the Election.
gatzke
QUOTE (lilplatinum @ Aug 13 2008, 10:40 am) *
Which article or ammendment regards national defense? The framers intent was to have a weak standing military and a citizen militia, not spend trillions of federal tax dollars invading other countries. I'm sure they could wiggle health care into the interstate commerce clause, its how the feds have usurped so much other power.

And the right to privacy has also been extended in less that proper ways.

I am surprised "promote the general welfare" is not used more by socialists to aid their causes.

As for enumerated powers, the expansion of the federal government has always bothered me, WRT the 10th amendment that gives powers not delegated in the constitution to the states.

WRT to defense, it is laid out in article 1 mostly.

Preamble, "provide for the common defence" seems relevant.

Article 1.8, "to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence" also
"To declare War, "
"To raise and support Armies,"
"To provide and maintain a Navy;"

4.4 also: "The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican
Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on
Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature
cannot be convened) against domestic Violence."

I also searched for "national health care" and "welfare payments" and "free abortions" but that apparently was not written into the constitution. They must be implied powers...
gatzke
QUOTE (horseshoe7 @ Aug 13 2008, 10:46 am) *
Military domination will be or is becoming a relic of the past. This process began with the dropping of the atomic bomb. Economic domination is the modern means of societal control.

Baa. Baa. I am safe. Baa. I don't need any defense. Baa.

French, 1930s. "We have this great wall that will protect us from all aggression."

I will agree on economic domination, but even in your socialist utopia you still need the Polizei.
lilplatinum
QUOTE (gatzke @ Aug 13 2008, 1:03 pm) *
Article 1.8, "to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence" also
"To declare War, "
"To raise and support Armies,"
"To provide and maintain a Navy;"

Notice it specifically says maintain a Navy, but doesn't say maintain an army.. If you want to nitpick and read it literally you have to interpret that saying that you can raise an Army for war but after that the general protection should be the miliita.. Kinda like the Continental Army was raised in times of means.

QUOTE
I also searched for "national health care" and "welfare payments" and "free abortions" but that apparently was not written into the constitution. They must be implied powers...

Judicial review, my friend, like it or not the constiution is interpreted to do a whole lot of things. If you had your reading there would be no national highway system as that is not explicitly written in the constitution.
horseshoe7
Police and military are two different things.

Like I said, I mention the need for universal healthcare and now I'm a socialist. You are brainwashed, albeit perhaps ever so lightly, but socialism = bad is purely brainwashing. many people have already highlighted in this thread the benefits to capitalism if a few social policies were to be put in place. but NO, I just heard the word socialism. Out. OUT!
eurovol
The Constitution gives the Federal and State Govs the ability to make laws that promote what is written in the preamble and in the performance of its specified duties, but limited by the Bill of Rights (and other Amendments). It was designed to allow for laws to change as the people and times changed, but to make it very difficult to amend the limitations imposed on Government over the inalienable rights of its citizenry.

Everybody needs equal access to health care, but not everyone needs a baseball stadium (ie in promoting the general welfare). However, that didn't stop Bush from screwing over the tax payers of Texas in his baseball stadium deal. How to promote the general welfare means different things to different people. That is probably the biggest thing that separates the various Party ideologies. Personally, I feel that the Dems are more interested in promoting a baseline of "general welfare" for all the people whereas the Reps are more interested in blaming those that fall below that baseline and taking the stance that they are not thy brother's keeper. You can see it in the comments here and it is pretty sad to see.
lilplatinum
QUOTE (eurovol @ Aug 13 2008, 1:35 pm) *
Everybody needs equal access to health care, but not everyone needs a baseball stadium (ie in promoting the general welfare). However, that didn't stop Bush from screwing over the tax payers of Texas in his baseball stadium deal.

Thats kinda a non sequitor. Baseball stadiums are not federally funded, they are municipally funded and completely within the rights of a municipal government to enact. Furthermore the tax payers of Texas didn't pay for the ballpark, the residents of Arlington did through increased taxes. Considering the presence of 6 flags and the ballpark are major sources of money into Arlington, I think it was arguably justified - even if building a stadium for the baseball team that has the record for the longest existing team to never win a playoff series is questionable.
Sanwald
QUOTE (horseshoe7 @ Aug 13 2008, 10:46 am) *
Military domination will be or is becoming a relic of the past. This process began with the dropping of the atomic bomb. Economic domination is the modern means of societal control.

Tell the Georgians that.
gatzke
I am tired of arguing US social policy with people that aren't even USians ('cept you eurovol, you'll always be my favorite biggrin.gif )

Back on topic,

The new redstate update is out on John Edward. Funny
http://www.redstateupdate.com/navigation?id=58488

John McCain veepstakes is funny
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E9rihV1mcB4

Anyone think HRC will fight it out in Denver?
http://www.thebulletin.us/site/index.cfm?n...76361&rfi=8

She blames Edwards for her loss. When is she talking at the convention? Maybe she will reneg on her withdrawl?
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2008/a...nearly-settled/
cinzia
In 1776, you paid for your healthcare, when it was available, with chickens.

In 2008, guaranteed health care for all citizens could be seen as securing domestic tranquillity. People who have well-paying professional or unionized jobs generally have health insurance, and are much less likely to go bankrupt paying for care than those without insurance, or without enough insurance. Lots of people are dissatisfied with paying increased taxes to fund hospital emergency care for the uninsured.

If we need congressional action to step in and bail out individuals and companies who are in trouble from being overextended on their mortgages, our lawmakers sure as hell ought to be able to step in and prevent the kind of financial trauma caused by lack of adequate health insurance. But Congress has not done this, because empty houses sitting around are a blot on the landscape and a drain on everyone's property values, while broke sick people are not.

Gee, gatzke, if you want to discuss US policy with Americans only, why don't you do it on a forum less focused on the international community?
lilplatinum
QUOTE (gatzke @ Aug 13 2008, 4:12 pm) *
I am tired of arguing US social policy with people that aren't even USians ('cept you eurovol, you'll always be my favorite )

I know Texas is better than the other 49 states in the Union, but we're still Americans damnit.
gatzke
But you don't really want to be. And you always remind people about your independence.

Texas, the Bavaria of the US.

I am a southerner. We had a few years of independence as well, but that did not turn out so great.
Pages: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152
You are viewing a low fidelity version of this page. Click to view the full page.