sea-king
Apr 27 2008, 10:47 pm
Stereotypical, wrong.
Atypical, correct.
ceogero
Apr 27 2008, 11:50 pm
disregardless
Genie
Apr 27 2008, 11:56 pm
irregardless is the more common flarp.
kitkat64
Apr 28 2008, 7:36 am
affect and effect
thefirelane
Apr 28 2008, 7:59 am
points are never mute, they are moot
Keydeck
Apr 28 2008, 8:04 am
supposebly...come here, *smack!*
Unless you're that fat tongued fecker, Jamie Oliver, there's no excuse.
SpiderPig
Apr 28 2008, 8:07 am
The Amis that write "There" instead of "Their"
Beardie
Apr 28 2008, 8:11 am
"would of", "could of", "should of" etc
When they mean "would've", etc
Beardie
Apr 28 2008, 8:12 am
people who use etc all the time.
Timmeh
Apr 28 2008, 8:31 am
Crisps and pickle. Crisp describes the item, it's not the item. To pickle is a process, it's not the item.
Moonboot
Apr 28 2008, 8:37 am
loose and lose!
Allershausen
Apr 28 2008, 8:37 am
QUOTE (Timmeh @ Apr 28 2008, 9:31 am)

Crisps and pickle. Crisp describes the item, it's not the item.
Rubbish, crisps are an item, I'll have a packet of Cheese and Onion crisps please and I would like them to be crisp, not soggy! Bloody colonials, you've got no idea.
thefirelane
Apr 28 2008, 8:39 am
QUOTE (Timmeh @ Apr 28 2008, 9:31 am)

To pickle is a process, it's not the item.
I'm pretty sure Pickle can correctly be used as a noun and verb.
eurovol
Apr 28 2008, 8:43 am
The word "pedant" when one really means "anal orifice".
Hazza
Apr 28 2008, 8:50 am
Ridiculous is spelt with an "i". There is no such word as "rediculous".
If you do a search on TT for the non-word "rediculous", you get 5 pages worth of posts.
Wrong, wrong, wrong...
Timmeh
Apr 28 2008, 8:55 am
QUOTE (Allershausen @ Apr 28 2008, 8:37 am)

Rubbish, crisps are an item, I'll have a packet of Cheese and Onion crisps please and I would like them to be crisp, not soggy! Bloody colonials, you've got no idea.
They're "chips" because that's exactly what they are...chips of potato (which are crisp). Bloody English with their bastardisation of English.
QUOTE (thefirelane @ Apr 28 2008, 8:39 am)

I'm pretty sure Pickle can correctly be used as a noun and verb.
Not in real English
lilplatinum
Apr 28 2008, 8:58 am
Oed lists pickle as a noun and a verb..
I hate when people say play it by year instead of play it by ear...
thefirelane
Apr 28 2008, 9:01 am
Unless you are a bored fisherman whose hunger causes him to sample the tackle, you probably aren't waiting with "baited breath"
You are waiting with "bated breath"
Allershausen
Apr 28 2008, 9:03 am
QUOTE (Timmeh @ Apr 28 2008, 9:55 am)

Bloody English with their correct use of English.
The clue to the correct use of English is in the name! They're not chips of potato, they are slices of potato. A bag of chips looks like this:
gemini
Apr 28 2008, 9:10 am
"alot" is NOT a word. A (space) lot... as in many. exp. I had a lot of crisps for lunch.
For some reason that mistake is made on here all the time and makes me crazy because it is rather easy to spell "a lot"!
Rilana
Apr 28 2008, 9:10 am
when people spell definitely as "definately"...really sends shudders down my spine.
Timmeh
Apr 28 2008, 9:44 am
QUOTE (Allershausen @ Apr 28 2008, 9:03 am)

The clue to the correct use of English is in the name! They're not chips of potato, they are slices of potato. A bag of chips looks like this:
They're both chips, because that's exactly what they are, chips (ie bits) of topato. They're certainly not "crisps of potato" are they? Not all chips (crisps) are just slices, there are some that take other forms.
Allershausen
Apr 28 2008, 9:56 am
No, they are potato crisps, made from potato slices, anything else are potato snacks. Chips are what you have with fish, as in fish and chips. Or do you eat crisps with your fish in the colonies?
SpiderPig
Apr 28 2008, 9:58 am
This thread needs pictures..

Eleanor Rigby
Apr 28 2008, 10:00 am
sticking an "e" on the end of potato and tomato
"expecially"
islandchick
Apr 28 2008, 10:00 am
Surprised no one mentioned the amazingly common "your" in place of "you're". Seen it way too many times here on TT.
Kay
Apr 28 2008, 10:03 am
Not to mention "it's" instead of "its" and "who's" instead of "whose".
sarabyrd
Apr 28 2008, 10:05 am
"Please fill out between the gaps."
Or, when you are repeating something for the first time: "I repeat again ..."
Myself - to be avoided at most times
Random capitals - German is bad enough about them
Critique - what's wrong with criticism?
Owain Glyndwr
Apr 28 2008, 10:08 am
QUOTE (lilplatinum @ Apr 28 2008, 9:58 am)

I hate when people say play it by year instead of play it by ear...
sure you weren't listening to a Welshman? Year, ear and here are pronounced almost identically in many south walian dialects.
Owain Glyndwr
Apr 28 2008, 10:10 am
My personal pet hate is when people say they have "Two choices" when they really mean they have "a choice" (between two options).
Eleanor Rigby
Apr 28 2008, 10:11 am
or two twins
"She gave birth to two twins"
Tom34
Apr 28 2008, 10:14 am
...and that the plural of fish is fish...and not fishes
Eleanor Rigby
Apr 28 2008, 10:18 am
Both fish and fishes are correct.QUOTE
Both "fish" and "fishes" are acceptable plurals, and both forms are common.
Timmeh
Apr 28 2008, 10:20 am
QUOTE (Allershausen @ Apr 28 2008, 9:56 am)

No, they are potato crisps, made from potato slices, anything else are potato snacks.
I know you brits call them crisps. Why? Because they are crisp, no? But what they actually
are is chips (or slices if you prefer) of potato which have been fried/baked until they are crisp.
QUOTE (Allershausen @ Apr 28 2008, 9:56 am)

Chips are what you have with fish, as in fish and chips. Or do you eat crisps with your fish in the colonies?
We eat chups with our fish. As crisps do not exist.
kitkat64
Apr 28 2008, 10:21 am
QUOTE (islandchick @ Apr 28 2008, 11:00 am)

Surprised no one mentioned the amazingly common "your" in place of "you're". Seen it way too many times here on TT.
I've made this mistake myself but not because I don't know the difference, but because I type words not letters when I type and sometimes, I just make a typo. I've actually caught myself a couple of times.
Rilana
Apr 28 2008, 10:28 am
QUOTE (Owain Glyndwr @ Apr 28 2008, 11:10 am)

My personal pet hate is when people say they have "Two choices" when they really mean they have "a choice" (between two options).
yep, I've never thought of that actually... I guess it should be two potential choices of which one could make one... if wanting to point out the fact that there are two.
lilplatinum
Apr 28 2008, 10:31 am
Also, when someone says "x is begging the question" when they really mean "x leads us to ask the question".
sea-king
Apr 28 2008, 10:33 am
Apre“s ski. Drives me nuts every time I see it. Apre is ski???
Allershausen
Apr 28 2008, 10:34 am
QUOTE (Timmeh @ Apr 28 2008, 11:20 am)

I know you brits call them crisps. Why? Because they are crisp, no? But what they actually are is chips (or slices if you prefer) of potato which have been fried/baked until they are crisp.
We eat chups with our fish. As crisps do not exist.
They are slices of potato, not chips, fried to make them crisp, hence the name, potato crisps, shortened by most people to crisps.
Wtf are chups?
The whole world has heard of Fish and Chips.
HellesAngel
Apr 28 2008, 10:38 am
Nobody mentioned the apostrophe yet? And there and their and they're?
And 'Myself' is usually in the wrong place too.
Kay
Apr 28 2008, 10:39 am
QUOTE (Allershausen @ Apr 28 2008, 11:34 am)

Wtf are chups?
In Timmeh's post most likely just a typo. I very much doubt that he eats lollipops with his fish.
sarabyrd
Apr 28 2008, 10:44 am
Kay, we're talking about Timmeh here ...
Indiscriminate use of direct objects as nominative subjects: Him and me went to the cinema.
Use of nominative forms for indirect objects: "I feel the hunger between you and I" ("Hungry Eyes"), "If she ever found out about you and I" ("Run For You").
blowwavedave
Apr 28 2008, 10:51 am
QUOTE (Kay @ Apr 28 2008, 11:39 am)

In Timmeh's post most likely just a typo. I very much doubt that he eats lollipops with his fish.
Unless he's saying it NZ style, "Fush & Chups"...
To, too and two. It's really not too hard to write the right one, right?
Timmeh
Apr 28 2008, 10:53 am
QUOTE (blowwavedave @ Apr 28 2008, 10:51 am)

Unless he's saying it NZ style, "Fush & Chups"...
Bingo
Kay
Apr 28 2008, 10:57 am
Since a picture speaks a thousand words, let me borrow from an earlier thread:
Timmeh
Apr 28 2008, 10:58 am
QUOTE (Allershausen @ Apr 28 2008, 10:34 am)

They are slices of potato, not chips, fried to make them crisp, hence the name, potato crisps, shortened by most people to crisps.
Fine continue in your backward labeling of chips. The inventors of such an item, called them chips. The world calls them chips. The UK doesn't. Congratulations.
don_riina
Apr 28 2008, 11:05 am
QUOTE (Timmeh @ Apr 28 2008, 11:58 am)

The world calls them chips. The UK doesn't.
Screw "the world". Krouts call crisps chips, and that's a good enough for me to never do the same. The UK is allowed to call crisps crisps, because its our language, and anyway, we don't have rabies, unlike the dirty french.
cb6dba
Apr 28 2008, 11:10 am
As we buy them and make them we will call them what we damn well please thank you!
As the UK is part of the world, the world doesn't call them 'chips'..
How can it be backward if the name 'crisps' came after chips? If we were to call them chips, then it would be backward labeling
I have no problem with the simple adaption of name and products when in anohter country where there may be other terms for them.
In the states I used trash cans instead of bins, did not cause me any trouble at all.
On returning back to the UK, I reverted to using bins without noticing the difference.
I have also had few problem with aluminium cans in either country, I have always found the correct 'bin' or 'can' to put them in.
Then again, as the makers sliced deep friend tatties have made the extra effort to put pictures on the packaging I find this eliminates many of the potential problems.
EDIT: Please note, the above post includes sarcasm even if not obvious to the reader
Timmeh
Apr 28 2008, 11:11 am
But the item is not your item, it's American, therefore the original name "chips" is correct. It'd be the same if the rest of the world started calling roast beef, boot...just because. Fine go ahead and call it that, but it's wrong...no matter whose name is attached to the language.
Eleanor Rigby
Apr 28 2008, 11:14 am
Hehe. Welcome to a day in the life of an international English speaking couple.
"chips vs. crisps" is fight #437, which comes after "pants vs. trousers" and before "purse vs. handbags"
You are viewing a low fidelity version of this page. Click to view
the full page.