The tram extension to St. Emmeram has been in the planning for more than 15 years. The city made a first humble attempt to build it around 1995 but then focused on more central projects like the tram lines through Arnulfstraße and the "Osttangente" (lines 15/25 through
Haidhausen).
Also, one fact that is never mentioned in the new plans: there already was a tram line to Cosimapark until 1980, when construction for the U4 at Arabellapark started and resulted in a "temporary" cut-back of the tram to Effnerplatz. Anybody here ever noticed the short section of old tram tracks in the middle of Englschalkinger Str at the Arabellapark bus hub?
QUOTE(Eleanor Rigby @ Apr 9 2008, 1:24 pm)

that runs only every 20 minutes after 20:00.
The bus is already jam packed and with the growing number of people moving to that area, it's just not enough.
The new tram line - as any other tram line with exception of the 20/21 - will also operate a 20-minute interval starting at 8pm. Building the tram is mostly for expanding rush hour and midday capacity.
QUOTE(Owain Glyndwr @ Apr 9 2008, 4:06 pm)

The tram extension will be better than the bus because of the ability to get into town and possibly Schwabing (if they ever allow the extension through the
English gardens) without connecting. It will also have a better takt. On the downside, it doesn't solve the problem of getting to the S-bahn without changing buses.
Sorry to say, but actually the tram will have a noticeably worse Takt than the 59 bus, resulting in longer waiting times. The 59 operates every 5 minutes schoolday mornings and every 6 to 7 minutes schoolday afternoons. Tram will have a 10-minute interval at all times (except after 8pm when it switches to 20 minutes). This is due to the much higher capacity of a tram compared to an articulated bus. In the end, building this tram line is all about replacing 5 buses with 2
trams, and thus 5 bus drivers with 2 tram drivers, saving 60% of personnel costs.
QUOTE(MonksTown @ Apr 9 2008, 10:33 pm)

You are new in Munich?
They CLAIM (but I am not convinced) that the Cosima Tram won't mean the end of the U4 extension which is supposed to go to Johanneskirchen. Someday. Maybe.
OG's suggestion to route the tram then east to meet the S8 isn't bad, but WOULD mean the end of any U4 extension.
Munich's tram network hasn't been changed at all for almost 10 years. So, they really aren't messin' around with the tram routes too much

The tram extension does matter of factly not mean the end of the U4 extension, but it means if the U4 will be extended, it will 100% go to Englschalking because building it to Johanneskirchen would be a parallel service to the new tram. Anyway, the extension to Englschalking would be better because it would be much shorter (thus cheaper and more likely to be built) than bringing U4 service to Johanneskirchen. Also they could cut down bus service along Englschalkinger Str, saving lots of personnel and bus fleet.