QUOTE (Genie @ Apr 4 2008, 1:48 am)

Having "experts" hanging out in gyms sounds like overregulation to me.
ok well there we differ in opinion - I think its perfectly reasonable for such an activity
QUOTE (Genie @ Apr 4 2008, 1:48 am)

What will be their job definition, authority, jurisdiction and power? Could they arrest someone if they don't like the way he ties a knot? Will they be able to kick people out of the gym because, e.g., they've never hear of method they're using?
job definition - supervising the climbing unless, as IPJ, suggested, the people can demonstrate that they can climb ok (some sort of certificate maybe - yeah you'll say thats overregulation)
QUOTE (Genie @ Apr 4 2008, 1:48 am)

And who's going to define who qualifies as an expert? The state? The police? The DAV?
The state yes why not seems reasonable?
QUOTE (Genie @ Apr 4 2008, 1:48 am)

Are they going to be paid by these bodies, or is their salary going to come off the gym owners?
the gym owners obviously
QUOTE (Genie @ Apr 4 2008, 1:48 am)

Plus again, there are the outside walls, are you going to fence those? What about walls that aren't bolted?
ok, you're talking about mountains - well thats neither here nor there when it comes to supervised facilities. Leave then as they are and let people have accidents on them if they want. Not relevant IMO
You obviously know more about this than I do so maybe I'm missing something - but I agree with Ruthie, just having some random Dad who thinks he knows what he is doing being responsible for kids seems ridiculous - I think I#d prefer to have no such indoor walls than that situation allowed.