eurobabs
Oct 25 2007, 7:14 am
HEM
Oct 25 2007, 11:36 am
And it got there. Now where was that post from some misery saying (hoping) that flight would be cancelled and replaced by a B777?
susieq
Oct 25 2007, 12:49 pm
Just read that some tosser paid $100k for the pleasure...got to have rocks in his head..
thefirelane
Oct 25 2007, 12:50 pm
I believe the seats were auctioned off for charity.
grazzenger
Oct 25 2007, 12:58 pm
i also believe you can have a private suite!! i guess that'll be what they had. i bloody hope so at that price.
thefirelane
Oct 25 2007, 1:02 pm
Cool, an airplane with a "Champaign room"
JerseyBoy
Oct 25 2007, 1:13 pm
Now let's see if Singapore Airlines will make any money back after investing so much money on this plane.
1) They got that one "for free" (no link to prove this...)
2) They are no fools - nor are Emirates who I believe will be the second airline to receive a plane.
eurovol
Oct 25 2007, 1:18 pm
Yes, the top bidder got the first class suite with a double bed.
susieq
Oct 25 2007, 1:23 pm
So he spent $100k to have kip in a double bed...hmmmmh
Crawlie
Oct 25 2007, 10:21 pm
QUOTE (thefirelane @ Oct 25 2007, 1:02 pm)

Cool, an airplane with a "Champaign room"
Cool! Do they have an Urbana room as well?
Darkknight
Oct 25 2007, 10:39 pm
Checkout the SQ A380 Cabin Videos
hereClick the link, then the big A380 Image at the bottom.
Quasimodem
Oct 25 2007, 11:03 pm
It's nice that Economy Class is no more than what it costs on other flights. I believe I saw 430 Euros as the price for that class of travel. I hope the other airlines to receive the A380 will continue this policy.
And the B777? That's Boeing's "plastic airplane" isn't it?
Last time I checked, that plane was still on the "drawing boards".
Q
Darkknight
Oct 25 2007, 11:06 pm
Nope The plastic plane is the 787 Dreamliner..
Bumpy
Oct 25 2007, 11:17 pm
QUOTE (Quasimodem @ Oct 26 2007, 12:03 am)

It's nice that Economy Class is no more than what it costs on other flights. I believe I saw 430 Euros as the price for that class of travel. I hope the other airlines to receive the A380 will continue this policy.
Why should it cost more?
QUOTE (Quasimodem @ Oct 26 2007, 12:03 am)

And the B777? That's Boeing's "plastic airplane" isn't it?
The B777 is made from conventional materials and has produced a fleet of over 650 aircraft. It was originally the MD11 stretch before Boeing bought McDonnell Douglas company. The 777 is an excellent aircraft which is very quiet - very unlike the football sized waiting lounge of the A380 with screaming kids all around...
QUOTE (Quasimodem @ Oct 26 2007, 12:03 am)

Last time I checked, that plane was still on the "drawing boards".
I think you're confusing the B787 with the A350.
Quasimodem
Oct 25 2007, 11:21 pm
QUOTE (Bumpy @ Oct 25 2007, 11:17 pm)

Why should it cost more?
Exactly, but someone's going to come up with "Hey, we're offering roomier seats! Lets charge more.
The B777 is made from conventional materials and has produced a fleet of over 650 aircraft. It was originally the MD11 stretch before Boeing bought McDonnell Douglas company. The 777 is an excellent aircraft which is very quiet - very unlike the football sized waiting lounge of the A380 with screaming kids all around...
I think you're confusing the B787 with the A350.
You're right. I did confuse the two. Thanks for clarifying
William
Oct 26 2007, 7:47 am
Oh wucking funderful; if Qantas or Lufthansa start operating those on a Sydney-Munich route they can get twice as many Aussies to the Oktoberfest
Darkknight
Oct 26 2007, 7:49 am
Frankfurt is the main Germany/Sydney route hub. Still just a 45 minute flight away..
Fribble
Oct 26 2007, 9:03 am
I read that there are 12 private suites a/k/a first class seats that will go for around 5 thousand euro each on normal flights, complete with bed, comfy chair, table, and Givenchy tableware, crystal, and linens, plus Ferragamo toiletries... 60 business class seats and the rest economy with less legroom than some or all other Singapore economy seats. Though fortunately it's still a comfy airline no matter where you sit.
TexMunich
Oct 26 2007, 10:49 am
Just what you want after a long flight - clear customs with 600 people.
The B-787 is no more plastic than the A-380. They are both made partly out of composite materials. Airbus has had some problems with the composite tails on some of their airplanes.
As it stands now Airbus still needs several hundred more orders to break even on the A-380.
bluedave
Oct 26 2007, 1:37 pm
May i ask upon what basis you make the statement of several HUNDRED more to break even?
parnell
Oct 26 2007, 2:04 pm
Anti-Euro bias anyone?
Darkknight
Oct 26 2007, 2:15 pm
@TexMunich
The A380's fusalage, wings and other key components are metal. The 787 is Entirely composite. There are Investigative TV show videos and reports on these 2 planes. Have a google search.
There's an entire Discovery channel series called
Building the A380 which covers manufacture from end to end. In it you will see them grinding down, riviting and polishing all the metal parts, and many other steps needed to build the Super Jumbo.
maddul
Oct 26 2007, 2:26 pm
Bumpy
Oct 26 2007, 2:27 pm
QUOTE (bluedave @ Oct 26 2007, 2:37 pm)

May i ask upon what basis you make the statement of several HUNDRED more to break even?
AIRBUS needs to win orders worth approximately $78 billion (£40 billion) before its troubled A380 superjumbo project breaks even.Airbus, which is a division of the European aerospace and defence group EADS, has increased the
break-even point for the project to
420 aircrafts from last year’s forecast of 270.
420 BE -
190 orders = 230 (gap).
Several–adjective
1. being more than two but fewer than many in number or kind: several ways of doing it.
Bumpy
Oct 26 2007, 2:29 pm
Holy shit, maddul and I think alike!
bluedave
Oct 26 2007, 4:52 pm
Try reading the internal mail and you will see a different picture.
As Darknight said the entire manufacturing philosophy of the 787 against the 380 is totally different.
Yes, there are composites in the build, but the A380 design is essentially still an aluminium aircraft, trust me.
The 747 damn near broke Boeing at the time of launch but has proven to be their saviour, i confidently predict the A380 will do the same for Airbus.
TexMunich
Oct 26 2007, 5:02 pm
QUOTE (parnell @ Oct 26 2007, 3:04 pm)

Anti-Euro bias anyone?
Nope, see responses from others above. Nice try though.
QUOTE (Darkknight @ Oct 26 2007, 3:15 pm)

@TexMunich
The A380's fusalage, wings and other key components are metal. The 787 is Entirely composite. There are Investigative TV show videos and reports on these 2 planes. Have a google search.
There's an entire Discovery channel series called
Building the A380 which covers manufacture from end to end. In it you will see them grinding down, riviting and polishing all the metal parts, and many other steps needed to build the Super Jumbo.
Nope again. Airbus is made from metal and composites. The Tail is a key component made from composites. Other areas from composites are depicted below.

Link to the full slide presentation.
http://www.msm.cam.ac.uk/phase-trans/2001/stef/img11.htmFor further reading.
http://composite.about.com/cs/aerospacenews/a/bpr_hitco.htmhttp://www.content.airbusworld.com/SITES/C..._08_adva380.pdfhttp://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb52...01/ai_n20432462
TexMunich
Oct 26 2007, 5:04 pm
QUOTE (bluedave @ Oct 26 2007, 5:52 pm)

Try reading the internal mail and you will see a different picture.
As Darknight said the entire manufacturing philosophy of the 787 against the 380 is totally different.
Yes, there are composites in the build, but the A380 design is essentially still an aluminium aircraft, trust me.
The 747 damn near broke Boeing at the time of launch but has proven to be their saviour, i confidently predict the A380 will do the same for Airbus.
What? Break them or be their saviour?
bluedave
Oct 26 2007, 5:13 pm
Come on Tex ferchrissakes, the A380 is still essentially an aluminium aeroplane isn't it?
Yes, it has composites but the major part of the structure, ie the fuselage is aluminium.
I have spent many years working on this aircraft and therefore know what i am talking about.
As for saviour or broke, being obtuse does you no favours.
Both are good aircraft in their own right and are not directly comparable with one ( A380 ) favouring the hub concept, against the 787 favouring the point to point option, the 747X was the only direct competitor to the A380.
DrivinWest
Oct 26 2007, 5:19 pm
QUOTE (bluedave @ Oct 26 2007, 5:52 pm)

Try reading the internal mail and you will see a different picture.
I get the same internal mail. I'm convinced they're issued by the same spin-machine that made these:
A pack of cigs and a meter of hose would be a far more effective way of blowing smoke up our asses.
bluedave
Oct 26 2007, 5:25 pm
DW, you and i have been on enough programs to know that the whole thing is spin, BOTH aircraft.
A380 2 years late due to wiring problems . . . . oh really?
787 FAA major doubts on crash worthiness and fire retardant problems . . . is that so?
All i'm saying is people quoting stuff directly from the Press or intarweb have no idea what is really going on inside the industry, just as with any other business sector.
The Europe v USA slant doesn't help either.
We ALL, let me say that again, WE ALL need a healthy industry and competition on both sides of the pond!!
DrivinWest
Oct 26 2007, 5:50 pm
QUOTE (bluedave @ Oct 26 2007, 6:25 pm)

The Europe v USA slant doesn't help either.
To be clear, I'm not being anti-Euro in any way. Remember, I am employed by the European aerospace industry.
It would be silly anyhow,
the USA makes more money on the sale of each Airbus than any other country:
QUOTE
The Airbus procurement budget in the US is bigger than any other country – even Europe - with some 46% of Airbus aircraft related procurement coming from the US
My guess is that that number has gone up since the whole Spirit AeroSystems/BAE deal but I'm really not sure.
QUOTE (bluedave @ Oct 26 2007, 6:25 pm)

All i'm saying is people quoting stuff directly from the Press or intarweb have no idea what is really going on inside the industry, just as with any other business sector.
True, however internal mail tends to paint a rosy picture for employees - morale and all that. The truth lies somewhere in between.
QUOTE (bluedave @ Oct 26 2007, 6:25 pm)

We ALL, let me say that again, WE ALL need a healthy industry and competition on both sides of the pond !!
That goes without saying.
Back to the A380, it's a shame that Singapore was the launch airline. Their paint scheme is FUGLY. The A3XX scheme made for a much prettier airplane.
TexMunich
Oct 26 2007, 5:51 pm
QUOTE (bluedave @ Oct 26 2007, 6:13 pm)

Come on Tex ferchrissakes, the A380 is still essentially an aluminium aeroplane isn't it ?
Yes, it has composites but the major part of the structure, ie the fuselage is aluminium.
I have spent many years working on this aircraft and therefore know what i am talking about.
As for saviour or broke, being obtuse does you no favours.
Both are good aircraft in their own right and are not directly comparable with one ( A380 ) favouring the hub concept, against the 787 favouring the point to point option, the 747X was the only direct competitor to the A380.
I agree the fuselage is aluminium, but the tail is not. As a pilot who has flown large transport aircraft (>700,000lbs or 317 Metric Tons) I consider the Tail to be a major component. Considering the Tail is what? 24 Meters high. It better be tough, composite or metal, to handle the side loads placed on it during turbulence and takeoff & landing crosswinds.
Both are good aircraft serving different segments of the market. I just wouldn't want to evac the A-380 on the ground.
QUOTE (TexMunich @ Oct 26 2007, 6:51 pm)

Both are good aircraft serving different segments of the market. I just wouldn't want to have evac the A-380 on the ground.
The evacuation tests took place in Hamburg & within the time limits. One of the girls (young ladies) in our flying club works there (in fact a number do) - she took part in the evacuation tests exiting from the top deck...
bluedave
Oct 26 2007, 6:06 pm
QUOTE (DrivinWest @ Oct 26 2007, 6:50 pm)

Back to the A380, it's a shame that Singapore was the launch airline. Their paint scheme is FUGLY. The A3XX scheme made for a much prettier airplane.
No arguments there.

Quite like this Qantas one myself.
TexMunich
Oct 26 2007, 7:34 pm
QUOTE (HEM @ Oct 26 2007, 6:53 pm)

The evacuation tests took place in Hamburg & within the time limits. One of the girls (young ladies) in our flying club works there (in fact a number do) - she took part in the evacuation tests exiting from the top deck...
I was thinking more of your average passenger, not a volunteer, having to be pushed out when they stand on the top deck and look down the slide.
Darkknight
Oct 26 2007, 10:16 pm
If/When your ass is on the line, when push comes to shove, your going to jump down that slide. No questions asked.
Bumpy
Oct 29 2007, 12:22 pm
QUOTE (HEM @ Oct 26 2007, 6:53 pm)

The evacuation tests took place in Hamburg & within the time limits. One of the girls (young ladies) in our flying club works there (in fact a number do) - she took part in the evacuation tests exiting from the top deck...
Yeah my girlfriend works in the industry as well. She reported several people had broken legs!
HEM
Oct 29 2007, 12:30 pm
I heard that just one person suffered a bone injury. Still - in an evacuation the name of the game is to get out alive and not necessary with full dignity...
Katrina
Nov 1 2007, 3:31 pm
Times article:
Singapore Airlines: don't bonk in our beds.
The readers' comments on there are quite, quite brilliant.
HellesAngel
Nov 2 2007, 11:21 am
QUOTE
It may be a different story when they deliver Richard Branson's fleet of Airbus A380's - maybe they won't remain a virgin Airbuses for long...
Cassanova, York,
Fantastic!
Allershausen
Mar 18 2008, 10:29 am
The first commercial flight for the
A380 to the UK lands in Heathrow today. It will be interesting to see how Heathrow copes with so many people in one go. Assuming it's full of course.
HEM
Mar 18 2008, 11:03 am
So the third A380 was delivered... Apparently Singapore are very pleased with the aircraft they have...
bucket06
Mar 18 2008, 10:42 pm
QUOTE (Allershausen @ Mar 18 2008, 10:29 am)

The first commercial flight for the
A380 to the UK lands in Heathrow today. It will be interesting to see how Heathrow copes with so many people in one go. Assuming it's full of course.
I flew the A380 from Singapore to Sydney at Christmas and was surprised that the boarding and disembarkation were no worse than for a jumbo. You board through two separate entrances, - one for the upper deck and one for the lower deck. Now that i think about it the boarding was probably smoother than most jumbos i've boarded.
For the airport its the same as handling two jumbos at once. I didn't notice any difference in Sydney from getting off a jumbo flight.

Flapdoll
Mar 23 2008, 8:30 pm
Here are 2 parked at Changi airport, this was taken last Monday.
You are viewing a low fidelity version of this page. Click to view
the full page.