QUOTE
How does this 'capital stock' (the same concept, I assume, as the 'ageing reserve' mentioned by Villager) work in practice?
Is the basic idea that you pay more than you normally would for insurance at a younger age in order to pay less than you normally would in old age -- or something entirely different?
Correct, this is how it is supposed to work. There is the basic legal demand for the insurance to compute your personal risk in such a way for the premium that based on your age and gender and health condition the
health insurance should remain stable for the forseeable future (except some increase through inflation etc). On top of that the law requires
health insurances in Germany to charge an additional 10% on top of the premium just for an additional ageing reserve since it has become obvious that the scientific development in medicine and health care can cause unpredictable financial challenges in the future to the insurances and the insured.
QUOTE
QUOTE(Starshollow @ Jun 18 2008, 9:06 am) *
Example: German private health insurance will (nearly) always cover you worldwide including US, Canada and the Caribean and this is not something you can opt out from.
Why is that preferable to getting a tailored international policy (or perhaps a tailored German private insurance policy, if it allows for similar customizing) and buying an inexpensive comprehensive travel medical insurance policy when traveling outside Germany?
I could not say that there is an advantage one way or the other from a point of view of coverage. You are right that you can get youself a fullyear travel health insurance for reasonable costs and could be better of by selecting a Europe-only area of coverage with an international insurance. However, German insurances just don't allow for that, they always include world-wide coverage including US and Canada. This is why I usually try to show that while some international health insurance have cheaper premiums at first glance, a fair comparison of the coverage will often show that if that same insurance would have to extend the coverage to include US and Canada, the price difference more or less evaporates. But that does not mean that it could not be better for some to select the international insurance's more limited coverage if they do not need the worldwide coverage if they have a chance to select an international insurance after all...
QUOTE
QUOTE(Starshollow @ Jun 18 2008, 3:06 pm) *
If you can for instance accept a deductible of 600-750 EUR/year, premium prices can be reasonable in comparison with most international health insurances.
But if that deductible means that I won't be able to even see a doctor through the policy's coverage until I've paid out 600-750 EUR/year, to me that's essentially an additional payout on top of the actual premiums -- because the likelihood of needing to see a doctor during the year is much greater than the likelihood of needing the major medical coverage of the policy.
RMA explains that quite nicely: on one hand the insurances often reward you with a no-claims bonus and some (not all) do not count the costs for normal yearly or twice-a-year preventive check-ups with the doctor and dentist against the deductible or as harming your no-claims-bonus. And you are right as well: in order to compare an insurance with no deductible and one with 600 EUR deductible based on their premium costs you would have to add 50.- EUR/month in a fiar comparison to the average premium costs to the insurance with the deductible. But many newcomers to Germany just need a solid insurance solution to show the Ausländeramt or other immigration authorities and in order to save costs in the beginning (particularily if you believe to be yourself quite healthy) it can make sense to use such an insurance.
Cheerio