Bullshit Bingo

It has been highlighted that TT needs to take a more proactive vision towards the integration of newer members. I for one would like to see a vertical integration platform that we can use to produce seamless synergies throughout the network. But we cannot do it without your help. We need more people investment towards a future vision, and I am confident that with the assembled team we have here, that you people can think out of the box to develop an ongoing proactive solution. Volunteers are needed for this working co-operative initiative.

p.s. Raft building is cancelled this weekend.

Robust man, robust.

Wow, Johnny, you are really pushing the edge of the envelope there. I would like to take this opportunity to say that your positive contribution to helping us all to grow together as a team and extend the network of personal relationships that make TT such a great big glowing ball of happy happy and efficent posters has gone unrecognised for too long. We need to get some face time on this and create a 4,5 point plan asap if not sooner.

will there be drinks served?

Wise words from Yeti there people. As a valued member of the team I can see he has grasped the initiative and is going for a bluesky solution.

I'm setting up pre-meetings on the back of a matchbook right now. I will also order coffee mugs with inspirational messages.

The incremental futuristic advantages of these outwardly simple but intrinsically sophisticated tokens of the systematized improvement of our overall return on postage will be increasingly essential to our reverse of the sub-optimisation and we should aim for a tight time-phase response here.

Go power.

FYI as a heads up I too have the same mindset people. However I have an issue with multi-tasking so I'll take a phased approach in rolling out my contribution. I've got some challenges but we can take that offline.

Finally an inititive that is really going to push us forward as a community to where we need to be. I think we should be looking at a just-in-time approach to development of new forum interactors, so we can systematically integrate them into the core team. Using discipline and what we all know as hard-learned-lessons the forum fulcrum will be able to not only shift but balance out any anomalies caused by our expansion.

Suggest an excerise in cucumber picking for the new guys with key established linchpins to really welcome them to the fold.

This all looks like it's driving the bus from good to great, but there is a clear lack of outside of the box thinking and imagineering. We need to challenge the concept and focus on disciplined transaction based value preservation.

Remember people, when the cash cow moos, milk it!

Curse you, English! I needed my brain today! You used the P-word.

I believe we need to schedule a consultation meeting on proactive micro-adaptation of the vertical structure to discuss the feasibilities of said co-operative initiative prior to attending any pre-meeting. While pushing the envelope is certainly worthy of consideration, we need a synergy movement as a proactive approach to community development which reflects the diverse needs of Toytown.

woof.

Aaargh! Mercy, stop! TheDog just used the p word as well!

For a more seamless, dynamic, proactive exchange of ideas, I firmly believe that we need a open forum of forum members for discussion of member's discussions on the forum. Thanks to JE for spearheading this initiative.

Oops, nearly forgot. We're in Germany. Better finish this message accordingly.

Kind Regards,

Kind fucking regards. What does that even mean in English for the love of Palpatine?!?

Whilst applauding the pro-active statements expressed here we should not loose sight of the fiscal ramifications of this new direction we envisage taking, vis-a-vie the time spent to information given aspects of this new enterprise. As a multi-layered structure of team members operating on an individual basis, the full repercussions of any volunteered information and the ramifications to the individuals working efficiency should be fully investigated and in the fullness of time a cost/worth analyses should be forthcoming.

Will there be diversity protection safeguards in place from the onset? I would formally suggest that dissatisfaction management courses and minority protection questions be settled by a representative cross section of established contributors, with no bias being accorded to gender, race, creed or number of toes.

Post #14 sounds as if it taken straight from a Telekom or Daimler meeting

I would like to think that we transend such structures which, while still respected their contribution in the past must be deconstructed in order to free our creative urges and allow us to focus on our core values, without losing sight of new opportunities to expand beyond the traditional territory of the current corporate form.

Fully focussed (for Feierabend)

We should obviously establish a recourse for such dissatisfaction. There should be implanted in the framework, of any proposals to detect and highlight any bias within posting, an intrinsic flexiblity of non-accepted conformity to the usual norm. Failure to adhere to such norm, as speculated in the framework, would precipitate the requirement to, within clear guidelines, highlight the ways in which breaches of said norms were made.

This goes to the next one who uses the p-word.

I think we need to move beyond the framework to a definition of creative space that allows the organisation to grow in a non-organic manner will allowing for value-orietated preservation of our core features.

I think that the Concrete Swamp of Innovation Generation could be our next company slogan.

We are Teams.

I feel we need a new paradigm to enable us to leverage our resources going forward. Let's all touch base soon.

Is there already a substantial case for intiating a feedback monitoring mechanism?

I propose setting up a conference call to establish the common ground - if it exists.

Some excellent initial postings here, but we must be careful not lose sight of our main goal objective. TT is a finely balanced situation, heavily weighted towards the more experienced posters and with this in mind I think we must streamline innovative relationships and forge ahead into virgin territory. It is refreshing to see everyone is really together on this one, because as we all know there is only one I in ideal.

Whilst I am delighted with the huge surge in proactive ideas, we must keep this ball rolling and find a mutual (Fuck fuck I said mutual again) mechanism that measures the cutting edge results we all aspire to within the emerging framework.

Inclusion is the key. Any chance of a Good Friday Agreement. Or being a Thursday we could it the Toytown Thrusday Protocol.

Feature Rich (A TV?)

Exceed Expectations (Come twice?)

World Class (AC Milan?)

Passion (In the fucking bed man, not at work)

Win Win (a win at Chelsea followed the next week by a win at home to Liverpool)

Tight Integration (something that gays do with each other)

Mission critical (no loose tiles on the Space Shuttle por favor)

Best practices (how to treat herpes most efficiently)

Roadmap (Munich to Erding on the B471)

Look what you made me do. I had to shoot this innocent puppy.

ummm...what was the topic again? I lost myself reading all the yuppie talk.

The framework for the establishment and affirmation of newly integrated contributors.

Ah! yeah "a more proactive vision towards the integration of newer members". I am sorry to say, but you all sound like political figures. What exactly is the plan?

Who's going to take ownership of the issues arising so we can start managing our client's expectations?

jesus...it keeps going!

Somebody will have to put on the" welcoming new contributors and seamlessly integrating them into the existing but by no means optimal structure for positive form contribution and proactive preservation of the developed value system" cap.

I'm getting the feeling you're not very client-focussed Aschaffenburgboy.

I feel at this moment in time that we should try exclude any religious overtones to our on going quest and should at all times remain secular without losing the focus of the afore mention primary objectives.

The Lord will not help to rectify any pre-prejudices that may occur from long established lines of communication that are inherent in the working bounds of the forum. This is why the forsight of Johnny English to draw the attention our community to this issue shows a depth and perception which is truely world class.

I just really do not know what the hell you guys are talking about, after reading Johnny English's first post, is like I am reading ads for political campaings.

We're preparing ourselves to be a centre of excellence.

@Aschaffenburgboy. I am frankly concerned that you are not willing to break the boundaries into a new mindset. It is no good simply charging ahead. We are trying to formulate a strategy here, so that we can move forwards into top gear. Right now this thing is looking like a 3 way street and quite frankly if you are unwilling to make a valued contribution to this team initiative then we may need to withdraw your invite to the next paintballing weekend. Please try and stay on track or the excellent progress we are making will be wasted. We are only looking for team players in this thread. Remember there is only one U in unable.

See ...you just gave me an answer the Hilary Kunt Clinton would. You do not elaborate on anything tha could fix my problem of not understaind what exactly is goin on.

Your lack of faith is disturbing.

Honestly i did not understand! my previous comment was ment for wheel.

Ok ok I know it. We seem to be taking a very minamalist approach approach (fuck i am losing it) here. I like the ideas but do they have a sound basis in reality. I would also add the caveat that many of these processes have been implemented previously but it still lead to the mindless seal culling of Tiger_lily.

Maybe we should call it the Tiger Lilly programme. It sounds pure.

This could get bigger than the search for Maddie. Really

OH MY GOD! I really really, really did not understand what was going on, I got Johnny's first posting but after that, I just lost it. (I would no be reading all ove it if i was not interested, or did not believe in what Johnny posted)

I feel your lack of understanding is primarily induced by your inherent unwillingness to understand.

I beg to differ. To me it sounds like Save the Whales.

As a pädagogik graduate, I feel we should all take part in some team building exercises to increase the level of cooperative motivation. There are also obviously intercultural issues that need to be dealt with. I suggest a weekend in the Alps, where each older members adopts a newbie to be their "special partner" for the duration of our stay. I will be bringing newspaper and sellotape for the obligatory bridge building contest, and there will be a number of games which involve somebody leaving the room and returning to guess what is going on. Should the weather be nice, we may also perform trust building exercises involving falling off a ladder and possibly abseiling.

people, people, slow down. although I find your pro-active, pro-synergy, pro-living and pro-premeeting talk to be a highly positive initiative we are forgetting the grassroots. I propose talks of initiating the possibility of having a feasibility check on setting up a committee. I would suggest a highly feng suay approach to proactive non negativity with a lateral entrance.

Suck my left nut Allershausen! call me stupid, dumb or whatever you wish, but didn't anybody reading see that I just did not understand what was going on? and instead of clarification, I get comments like this. So really Johnny you think your Idea is going to work?

The establishment of our drive to a uniform acceptability should not be hindered by the use of any one example, this will divert (through disassociation of new cases) the mind set of our current and potential new member enablers. We should instead be keeping our eye on the ball and our a heads in the game, while we focus on a flexible solution.