Malcolm Spudbury
Mar 14 2007, 3:06 pm
TZ-Online: Schützt ein Verbot unsere Kinder?German politicians are discussing whether or not to increase the legal age for consumption of alcohol to 18 after a 16-year-old almost died after drinking 52 shots of Tequila.
SleeplessInMunich
Mar 14 2007, 3:09 pm
Isn't is only 16 for beer anyway? So a 16 year old drinking tequila was already breaking the law. And I doubt an 18 year old would have handled 52 shots of tequila any better.
Rilana
Mar 14 2007, 3:12 pm
52??!! How do you manage that without first throwing up/falling sleep... anyway - I doubt raising the age would stop that kind of thing from ever happening again...
planetmoni
Mar 14 2007, 3:13 pm
i haven't made up my mind yet.
near my office, there are several (inner city) schools and most (male) pupils buy beer for lunch. bloody idiots. they think they look cool and/or mature when holding a bottle of beer in their hands. wishful thinking on their side imo. (i keep thinking what a waste of tax payers money as teachers won't be able to teach them much after lunch)
UrbanAngel
Mar 14 2007, 3:15 pm
I agree totally with SiM, exactly what I was going to say!
Allershausen
Mar 14 2007, 3:18 pm
They stop for lunch? They knock off at 1 o'clock. At least they do at my daughters school. I've always considered the attitude to alcohol very sensible here and banning teenagers from drinking won't stop them, it will just make it illegal and therefore even cooler! After all you're supposed to 18 in Britain but that didn't stop me or my mates drinking in pubs at 16. (Not at lunchtime though!)
UpQuark
Mar 14 2007, 3:21 pm
For pity's sake, it was 40 shots of vodka that killed John Bonham and he was well over 18.
Edit: He was actually 32 when he died. Sweet sweating jesus, that's a young age to die.
My son (17) has at least a couple of days a week with a 1 or 2 hour gap around midday.
On some of them he & his classmates go to local Chinese and eat the midday offering.
At least thats better than going to McDoof.
And they dont drink alcohol...
planetmoni
Mar 14 2007, 3:24 pm
i think the present regulation is ok.
thefirelane
Mar 14 2007, 3:44 pm
I say raise it to 21...
I don't know if most Americans agree with me on this... but looking back, all the time I'd spend out with friends hunting around for beer was probably more fun than when we actually had it. Later, in school the age limit forced us to have house parties, which were always more crazy and fun than normal old bars.
Then again, if you want the kids to be safer keep it how it is.. but I think 21 is more fun
Hutcho
Mar 14 2007, 3:45 pm
What a useless idea.. if someone wants to drink 50 shots of vodka they're going to drink 50 shots of vodka (well, up until they pass out anyway).. there are stupid people everywhere, it doesn't matter about the age..
Hutcho
Mar 14 2007, 3:47 pm
haha.. some truth in that thefirelane.. I remember when I wasn't old enough to drink, we'd have many adventures trying to get it, and man, once you got it you'd just drink and drink until your threw up! If it had been legal that definitely would have taken the appeal away and I'd probably have stopped at a few..
DrivinWest
Mar 14 2007, 3:48 pm
QUOTE (thefirelane @ Mar 14 2007, 3:44 pm)

I don't know if most Americans agree with me on this... but looking back, all the time I'd spend out with friends hunting around for beer was probably more fun than when we actually had it. Later, in school the age limit forced us to have house parties, which were always more crazy and fun than normal old bars.
I don't agree with raising it to 21 (I think voting, tobacco, alcohol, military service, etc. should all start at 19) but I see your point. Thwarting the law really was fun and house parties do beat the shit out of bars.
Chitown Chica
Mar 14 2007, 3:50 pm
Hmm...16 does seem like a kid to me so I could see 18. That said, folks here raised under the 16-year-old rule seem to have just as healthy an attitude toward drinking as folks I know from 18 and 21 minimum countries.
When I was in high school in Chicago, the minimum age to buy beer or hard alcohol was 21. That didn't stop anyone I knew that wanted to drink...from buying or from drinking.
In fact, it might have made it more enticing for them to drink hard alcohol instead of beer - which I would assume is more likely to lead to the 'ODing' incidents like the tequila example.
A single bottle can provide a faster route to drunkenness for more people and it is easier to "borrow" a bottle from parents and transport discreetly versus a big multi-pack of beer.
Now I'm curious - do shopkeepers here actually check the age when someone buys beer or alcohol? I'm wayyy over that age minimum so I have no idea!
Exile
Mar 14 2007, 3:52 pm
I don't think you should be allowed to be a teenager until you're at least 20 yrs old.
planetmoni
Mar 14 2007, 3:55 pm
growing up in an environment where i could drink legally at 16, i disagree with increasing the legal age.
when i started uni in the uk, i was surprised about the drinking habit of the freshers (not just them). i have been 'there' 3-4 years ago and thought it was rather late and no different to a 16yrs old (or younger

).
Chitown Chica
Mar 14 2007, 3:56 pm
And think of the huge industry that is "Fake IDs" in the States. If not for the 21 min, think of all the bar bouncers that would miss out on many a good laugh when little 18 year olds show them a homemade license or an expired license from a random state that has different hair color, height and ethnicity than they do.
The best was freshman year of college when a whole gaggle of kids would all show up with poorly made fakes from Kansas or any other state hundreds of miles from where they were!
Ha!
Mariposa
Mar 14 2007, 5:17 pm
I actually think it is fine how it is.
So many college kids die each year in the States, because they are out of their parents' house, go to frat parties and don't know how much they can handle. At my school a freshman died of alcohol poisoning in the third week of classes and that was the third alcohol-related death at colleges that semester!
Here most kids still live at home when they first have alcohol, and that way (usually) someone does look after them, and they can find out what their limits are more slowly.
The age limit is 16 only for beer and wine anyway, so this guy was not following the law anyway, what makes any politician think he would if the age was 18 for everything with alcohol?!
People who are stupid will always be stupid, regardless of the law.
But then for myself either way is fine, I would be able to drink anyway. I just think the way it is is fine. No one can completely prevent things like this from happening.
Each time I go to our offices near Denver the local newspaper is full of how young people are getting
seriously ill or even die after under-age drinking parties at a nearby university/college. Clearly "21" doesnt
help much there...
Mariposa
Mar 14 2007, 5:42 pm
I think one of the two other alcohol-related deaths that year (August 2004) actually happened in CO.
thefirelane
Mar 14 2007, 5:45 pm
QUOTE (Mariposa @ Mar 14 2007, 5:17 pm)

People who are stupid will always be stupid, regardless of the law.
True. Wasn't there a frat in CO that had a kid die during pledging because they made him drink too much... then shortly after they had another one die because they made him consume a huge quantity of water (presumably because it is 'safer')
don_riina
Mar 14 2007, 5:47 pm
Someone died on a US radio show after entering a water drinking contest to win, of all things, a totally gay nintendo wii.
Pat Bateman
Mar 14 2007, 5:49 pm
All that needs to be said here is: making Drugs illegal is never a good idea. 'Just say No' campaigns are neither. What we need is plain information without taking moral high grounds. If someone becomes addicted then it is always because he's fleeing something. In other words, if our societies were not so inhumanely cruel, almost no one would want to get away from reality so often and far that he actually got addicted.
Drug Addiction is the essence of Capitalism.
Mariposa
Mar 14 2007, 6:00 pm
Yeah, but now that would be working on the causes and not the symptoms, would it? Since when does society do any of that...
stubbs
Mar 14 2007, 6:10 pm
QUOTE (Chitown Chica @ Mar 14 2007, 3:50 pm)

Now I'm curious - do shopkeepers here actually check the age when someone buys beer or alcohol? I'm wayyy over that age minimum so I have no idea!
I'm 18, got here when I was 17 and the answer is no, ive never even been looked at twice.
I think that the lower age limit is great. For my grad ceremony we had "Dry Grad" school sponsered, super safe, super fun, and then the next night we had Wet Grad, it took place about an hour away from civilization along a narrow dirt road by a lake with lots of fun cliffs to fall off of, there were countless fights, a good 5 people i know went missing for large parts of the night, a friend of mine's brother who came with her and drove her home was too drunk to remember getting home and i myself saw 3 seprate ambulences, thankfully no one got seriously injured, but my point is that if drinking were legal at 16 or 17 in canada then we would have had a big drunken bash in a much safer central location, guests could have also been regulated and as students from other schools caused many of the fights this would have decreased casualties greatly. (sorry for the bad grammer)
Mariposa
Mar 14 2007, 6:12 pm
I've been carded before, and I've also seen others get carded before... I think it probably depends on where you go and on the individual cashier.
TheMoth
Mar 15 2007, 6:00 pm
I thought, with the exception of Scandinavia, Europe was always more easy going with booze than in the States. I have always admired this as mystifying booze makes kids want it all the more.
BadlandZ
Mar 15 2007, 6:53 pm
QUOTE (thefirelane @ Mar 14 2007, 7:44 am)

I say raise it to 21...
I don't know if most Americans agree with me on this... but looking back, all the time I'd spend out with friends hunting around for beer was probably more fun than when we actually had it. Later, in school the age limit forced us to have house parties, which were always more crazy and fun than normal old bars.
Then again, if you want the kids to be safer keep it how it is.. but I think 21 is more fun
Yea, I agree with the premise, and the conclusion.
Speaking strictly from the perspective of unscientific and anecdotal evidence, with vast generalizations, and no facts or hard evidence, I’d make this guess:
a) Drinking during “prohibition� in the US caused rampant gang violence and didn’t solve anything.
b ) Drinking age of 21 in US seems to have a culture of both non-drinkers and “problem alcoholics� much higher than other countries, more division, more problems.
c) European lower drinking ages seem to create (overall) a better understanding of responsibility with alcohol, learned at a very young age… Particularly with 16 year old limit in Germany and the high beer consumption rate in Bavaria, yet no where near the (apparent) high level of problems in the US (Alcoholics, AA, drunk drivers, MAD, etc…)
Like I said, all anecdotal evidence here, but I’d put forth this theory:
Making it legal takes the “risk� and “fun� out of it. It’s no longer has such a high appeal to the “rebel� mentality, and therefore the risks seem reduced.
Same goes for drugs IMHO, education always beats prohibition for most substances (especially when comparing results per dollar, or Euro!)
Timmeh
Mar 15 2007, 7:00 pm
Agreed, prohibition doesn't work full stop/punkt/period. 16 years of age for soft alcohol (bevvos & wine) and 18 for anything and everything else (hard liquor & drugs)
Timmeh
Mar 15 2007, 7:01 pm
Agreed, prohibition doesn't work full stop/punkt/period. 16 years of age for soft alcohol (bevvos & wine) and ganja. 18 for anything and everything else (hard liquor & hard drugs)
KingBilly
Mar 30 2007, 9:44 am
16 yr old Tom, from Berlin, died yesterday, 5 weeks after downing 52 tequilas. Here is the stoy from the
BZ.
What a clown! Feel sorry for his poor parents but congratulations to Tom for successfully taking himself out of the gene pool-what the hell did he think was going to happen?
Topics merged by admin
Owain Glyndwr
Mar 30 2007, 9:50 am
on hearing of the boy's death the landlord of the bar where he collapsed said "Als ich vom Tod des Jungen erfuhr, habe ich erst mal einen getrunken"

ahhhh the shear irony!
MonksTown
Mar 30 2007, 9:57 am
Expect moral panic from the politicians now about "binge drinking" and another rifle of your pockets with more tax on drink.
Sorry for the lad but it goes with the territory.
sarabyrd
Mar 30 2007, 10:07 am
And then you get politicians on the campaign trail publicly testing 12 (count them, twelve!) different kinds of Pils and maintaining that he prefers Weißbier.
QUOTE
Ein Minister guckt ins Glas
Erwin Huber testet Pils - und macht Wahlkampf
Es ist Wahlkampf, und der spielt sich, wenn es um den CSU-Vorsitz geht, auf zuweilen recht eigenen Foren ab. Am Mittwoch etwa hat Kandidat Erwin Huber nebst diversen Brauern und Experten an einem Biertest für die ZDF-Sendung Wiso teilgenommen. ... "Der moderne Bayer, der ich ja bin, trinkt natürlich ein Weißbier."
Süddeutsche Zeitung online, 29 March 2007
Hypocrites one and all.
Eleanor Rigby
Mar 30 2007, 10:10 am
For whatever the reasons may be, Germans have a much healthier attitude towards drinking than any country I know that has a higher drinking age limit. Perhaps there isn't an exact correlation there but it doese make sense.
onemark
Jul 1 2008, 10:18 pm
Raising the drinking age to 21 might not stop too many teenagers getting booze but it might make it easier to prosecute those outlets where they got it from - providing these can be tracked down, of course.
Bipa
Jul 1 2008, 10:22 pm
You're kidding about the 21 bit, right? If a kid is old enough to go to Afghanistan in his country's uniform and shoot and be shot at, then surely he's old enough to have a drink?!
You are viewing a low fidelity version of this page. Click to view
the full page.