QUOTE (MonksTown @ Nov 10 2006, 4:38 pm)

Cheers Bumpy for the other thing
I think I've backed up my postion quite well; that is trying to understand the thinking behind this decision rather than people just shouting rah-rah-rah and following what Saturn and
Karstadt want them to do.
It's a debate, of course there are different opinions andthere are no right and wrong answers.
BTW, what kind of society do you think I want to live in?
Hasn't ever been a blueprint from me on here, don't think I could present one, that isn't my politics anyway.
I specificly mentioned I don't want to live in a society with the widespread availability of guns.
Gun crime is fucking shocking and a lot of the time is the poorest and most disadvantaged who suffer under it.
What do you think on guns?
I think that guns are definitely a problem in countries like the US/SA/etc. Paradoxically, not in Canada though where gun laws are also very relaxed...
However the problem in the US is that you have the second Amendment -
QUOTE
A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
Which makes it incredibly more difficult to reverse the current interpretation.
I was just in DC on the weekend staying with one of my best friends who is and ATF agent. He runs around the country, and sometimes the world, working the Federal DA to build cases against offenders. He and I agreed that there is definitely far too easily an availability of weapons. Who wants these illegal weapons? Drug runners and gang members who haven't an education and have a fatal sense of death. These people represent 60% of the murders behind bars in federal prisons. Drugs and guns go hand in hand my friend tells. So, in short, I am against all forms of guns.
But the problematic issue here is that it is in the Constitution’s Bill of Rights #2 and will not be easily overturned. I also believe that Post Office has a very difficult time justifying it’s raison de etre whilst the private sector can provide better services instead. However the situation is that while the US Post Office have allowed some competition in, they will still remain what they are – a statutory monopoly. Because it is defined in the Constitution.
Catch 22.
And I agree, there are no right and wrong answers.