Showem
Sep 28 2006, 10:37 am
So a company has mistakenly billed me for a service I cancelled well within the proper time period. I'm not worried about that, but I do want to get it cleared up ASAP, so want to write them a letter to tell them why I'm not paying, so that I can get confirmation of it before we move.
Can anyone help me with the wording of saying basically the following:
I am unable to accept or pay your invoice, as I cancelled our agreement within the required notice period. Attached you will find documents showing said cancellation.
Thanks in advance for your help!
Didsbury's Daftest
Sep 28 2006, 10:50 am
Sehr geehrte Damen und Herrn,
da ich unsere Vereinbarung rechtzeitig (d.h. innerhalb der Kündigungsperiode) widerrufen habe, sehe ich mich nicht in der Position, auf Ihre Zahlungsanforderung eingehen zu müssen.
Im Anhang sehen Sie den Schriftverkehr, die meinen Standpunkt belegen.
Bitte bestätigen Sie mir schriftlich, dass Sie keine weiteren Rechnungen mehr in dieser Sache an mich schicken werden.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Showem
Sep 28 2006, 10:57 am
Most excellent, thanks Didsbury!
sarabyrd
Sep 28 2006, 10:59 am
Da ich den Vertrag form- und fristgerecht gekündigt habe, wird die Bezahlung Ihrer Rechnung abgelehnt. Ich verweise auf den beiliegenden Schriftverkehr und bitte um schriftliche Bestätigung, dass die Forderung Ihrerseits nicht weiter verfolgt wird.
A little harsher than DD, but shorter as well.
Tiggi
Sep 28 2006, 11:37 am
I don't think the noun agreement is right between clauses here?
QUOTE(Didsbury @ Sep 28 2006, 11:50 am)

Im Anhang sehen Sie den Schriftverkehr, die meinen Standpunkt belegen.
If you're using singular "den Schriftverkehr" in the first clause, it's technically incorrect to use the plural in the second clause. (Though you'd get away with it in colloquial speech, as it would be understood that you basically mean "the documents".) So I think it should be "den Schriftverkehr, der meinen Standpunkt belegt"?
Disclaimer: non-native speaker!
YorkshireLad6
Sep 28 2006, 11:52 am
Do you have confirmation from them that they accepted the cancellation? Proof you sent them a request to cancel is not proof that they accepted it...
Dostoyevsky
Sep 28 2006, 11:56 am
Tiggi's version looks better to me as well.
Kza
Sep 28 2006, 11:57 am
QUOTE(YorkshireLad6 @ Sep 28 2006, 12:52 pm)

Do you have confirmation from them that they accepted the cancellation? Proof you sent them a request to cancel is not proof that they accepted it...
Fucking tell me about it, this is the second year I have tried to quit vodafone, any written cancellation requests get mysteriously lost in the post, at least until after the 3 month window where you are allowed to cancel.
And of course the bank wont simply cut the payments.
coolerking
Sep 28 2006, 11:59 am
so why don't you send the letter by registered post
Kza
Sep 28 2006, 11:59 am
Yeah next time I take a day off I will.
MadAxeMurderer
Sep 28 2006, 11:59 am
Actually a lawyer told me that sending a registered letter is not enough, they can claim you send them an empty envelope. To be really sure you have to get a Gerichtsvollzieher to deliver a letter.
What do you mean the bank won't cut payments? The bank is obliged to cancel any direct debit if you request within 6 weeks.
Kza
Sep 28 2006, 12:03 pm
Hmm I will have to look into that too, they told me only vodafone can cancel it. Same story when I tried to quit the gym, (although in that case I was still in the contract so it was fair enough I guess)
Didsbury's Daftest
Sep 28 2006, 12:11 pm
QUOTE(Tiggi @ Sep 28 2006, 12:37 pm)

I don't think the noun agreement is right between clauses here?
If you're using singular "den Schriftverkehr" in the first clause, it's technically incorrect to use the plural in the second clause. (Though you'd get away with it in colloquial speech, as it would be understood that you basically mean "the documents".) So I think it should be "den Schriftverkehr, der meinen Standpunkt belegt"?Disclaimer: non-native speaker!
You're absolutely right Tiggi - not even my (proper)
German colleague(s) noticed. But as you said, if it's too late Showem will still get away with it.
Bavarians and grammar, tsssssssss...
DJ_Jazzy_Guff
Sep 28 2006, 12:12 pm
@Tiggi - who gives a monkeys if the noun agreement is not quite right! It read alright to me and they'll get the message!! That Digsbury fella's mail does the job.
Tiggi
Sep 28 2006, 12:19 pm
Well, Showem might, perhaps?
Of course the original does the job, I just happened to notice something that might optimise it, that's all.
Must remember your response next time one of my customers has a query though...
Showem
Sep 28 2006, 12:48 pm
For those who need closure, I decided first to phone the company rather than sending a letter straightaway. I'm guessing it's a problem they've had before, because she didn't even question me, just told me to fax them the invoice with her name on it and "stornieren" and she would take care of it. Follow-up phone call shows she has the fax and has taken care of it.
So I'll just keep this thread in mind in the off chance that it still slips through the cracks. Thanks for your help though.
Didsbury's Daftest
Sep 28 2006, 1:03 pm
Pleasure and Bon Voyage then
Mik Dickinson
Oct 3 2006, 9:59 am
Ksa you want to send it registered post with RückgabeSchein.This means that you get a piece of paper back when the recipient has received the letter.Your bank must stop payments and they can even reclaim wrongfull withdrawalls for up to 3 weeks after.When all said and done its your money
georgiagirl
Oct 30 2006, 10:50 am
Hi gang, I have a similar problem, but slightly more complicated than Showem's.
I need to send a letter to cancel my Deutsche Telekom account, as they have been billing me since August for phone service that I have never received. It's a long story, but basically after making several appointments to have the service installed (and the technical people never showing up) I have been billed for nearly four months of service even though I've never actually had a phone line.
I want to request a refund for the amounts I have already been billed, and will enclose the relevant invoices.
I don't even want to bother calling because I never get through to the right department, so sending a letter seems the best way. Can anyone suggest a concise wording for,
'I need to cancel my account, as I have been billed for service I never received. I am also requesting a refund of the enclosed invoices.'
Many thanks in advance for helping me cut ties with this horrible company.
sarabyrd
Oct 30 2006, 10:56 am
'I need to cancel my account, as I have been billed for service I never received. I am also requesting a refund of the enclosed invoices.'
Ich kündige den Vertrag fristlos, da ich die in Rechnung gestellten Leistungen trotz mehrmaliger Terminsvereinbarung zur technischen Einrichtung nie erhalten habe. Des weiteren bitte ich um Erstattung der beigefügten Rechnungen auf Konto ... bis ..."
Very important: Set them a deadline. After that, get a writ and impound their frigging bank account.
UrbanAngel
Oct 30 2006, 11:04 am
Also handy is to request eine schriftliche Bestätigung. Thanks for reminding me why I pay by
bill, not DD
georgiagirl
Oct 30 2006, 11:09 am
Thanks sarabyrd, that looks great! Will report back on what happens... and, for the record, not that it hasn't been said before on TT but...
Deutsche Telekom sucks. Hard.
Silly Point
Oct 30 2006, 12:03 pm
gg - I had exactly the same problem. Applied for the line end of June, got connected end of August. Billed since June. I called them up, explained the situation and was told I would get a refund on my next bill. True to their word in my October bill the excess charges were deducted.
sarabyrd
Oct 30 2006, 12:07 pm
QUOTE(UrbanAngel @ Oct 30 2006, 11:04 am)

Also handy is to request eine schriftliche Bestätigung. Thanks for reminding me why I pay by bill, not DD
Send the letter Übergabe-Einschreiben/Rückschein.
QUOTE(Silly Point @ Oct 30 2006, 12:03 pm)

gg - I had exactly the same problem. Applied for the line end of June, got connected end of August. Billed since June. I called them up, explained the situation and was told I would get a refund on my next bill. True to their word in my October bill the excess charges were deducted.
True, Telekom once charged me for a website that I did not have. After I complained I got reimbursed with the next bill.
UrbanAngel
Oct 30 2006, 12:09 pm
QUOTE(sarabyrd @ Oct 30 2006, 12:07 pm)

Send the letter Übergabe-Einschreiben/Rückschein.
This doesn't have the same function. All the registered mail does is confirm they got it. It doesn't confirm that they will refund your money! They could receive the letter then disagree with it...
sarabyrd
Oct 30 2006, 12:13 pm
Yeah, but they can't say that they never got it or were informed of the deadline. If they don't react - no matter which way - you can take the next necessary steps.
UrbanAngel
Oct 30 2006, 12:17 pm
That's true, but since you quoted me and then said to send it per Einschreiben, I thought you were linking your info to mine
YorkshireLad6
Oct 30 2006, 12:41 pm
QUOTE(UrbanAngel @ Oct 30 2006, 12:09 pm)

All the registered mail does is confirm they got it. It doesn't confirm that they will refund your money!
It only confirms they received
something. It doesn't confirm the content.
QUOTE(sarabyrd @ Oct 30 2006, 12:13 pm)

Yeah, but they can't say that they never got it or were informed of the deadline.
See above. The can say they were not informed of the deadline (unlikely, however, and there is probably no better way, but with an organisation as large as Telekom, anything can happen)
georgiagirl
Oct 30 2006, 12:42 pm
So do you have a better suggestion for how to ensure they can't deny having received the request, YL6? I'm not being cheeky, I'm being serious.
Edit: ah, you must've edited your post, I see now that you've indicated there is no better way. Pity, I was hoping you knew a failproof way to make sure I get my money reimbursed!
Memo
Oct 30 2006, 1:20 pm
Um, there is the fax option, actually. That way you have a confirmation of receipt AND content... I have cancelled my DT account by fax, so I know that it is accepted.
On the other hand, you can put a little P.S., stating that they will also receive the original by post shortly, and send it with "einschreiben".
georgiagirl
Oct 30 2006, 1:38 pm
Y'know, I wondered about that. Good to know that someone else has successfully used the fax option to cancel... will do that first, followed by a letter via post.
Memo, do you remember which department you faxed the request to?
YorkshireLad6
Oct 30 2006, 2:16 pm
You are supposed to send it to the number/address on the most recent invoice, as each customer has different responsible billing offices.
Hammonia
Oct 30 2006, 2:26 pm
Telekom really sucks.
We had ordered DSL in January, but cancelled a few days later as we decided for another provider.
Still got hardware and
bills, sent them back, bills were cancelled, it all seemed to be OK. For a few months.
Then all of a sudden they charge us 68,00 € for providing DSL - which we don't have from THEM. When I phoned them they even admitted to have on their records that we have DSL via another provider. But still sent us invoices. Took me another 4 phone calls to sort thins out.
My colleage also had a problem to cancel a Telekom-contract.
She cancelled the contract of her cousin, that had died, and Telekom keeps on sending bills. It's not only annoying, it's also mentally very hard for her to phone and write Telekom again and again to tell them that they are requesting money for a service to a person who died months ago. And then getting reminder after reminder...
Am just thinking: almost everybody I know who is or has ever been customer of Telekom has at some point received a bill (so in most cases that means direct debiting) for a service that has not actually been rendered.
So if Telekom get away with this in only 1% of all cases, they make a huuuuuge amount of money with it...
Question just is: could they reduce their staff by (let's say) 80% if they just stopped sending bills for non-supplied services? And make even MORE money with that???
Even if they don't get away with it in any case, they still have the interest of the money they debited from people's accounts, cos it usually takes months before you get the money back from them...
So maybe the Telekom people are in fact not silly at all, but very, very clever.
sarabyrd
Oct 30 2006, 2:35 pm
After 20 years in the collecting business I still recommend Übergabe-Einschreiben/Rückschein above a fax. You have the signature of someone working for/empowered by your opponent, and if said opponent claims not to have received your letter it sheds a bad light on his organization. Courts like that kind of meaty evidence when it comes to proving a point.
Only asking for written confirmation of his receiving your letter is generally not very effective.
hams
Oct 30 2006, 2:52 pm
It seems to me reading threads in this vein that not only is the market in this country not geared towards the consumer, but that consumer power is negligable.
Out of interest, is there a regulatory ombudsman for the Telecom's industry? Are there any TV programmes similar to the British 'Watchdog' where consumers name and shame, or magazines such as 'Which' with consumer reports from experts in varying fields? If not, then there is a huge market gap that needs to be filled.
Hammonia
Oct 30 2006, 2:59 pm
Am not watching
Germany TV lately, but a few years back there was a programme called "Wie bitte?!" where people reported the bad experiences they had with companies - and Telekom always had a special report in every single episode...
Don't know why they stopped this programme, it was hilarious - and I think it actually helped quite a few people because it was so embarrassing for the rotten apples to be named in a TV show.
But didn't seem to improve much at Telekom apparently.
UrbanAngel
Oct 30 2006, 3:01 pm
QUOTE(sarabyrd @ Oct 30 2006, 2:35 pm)

Only asking for written confirmation of his receiving your letter is generally not very effective.
You're still not getting my point, but nevermind. I give up! Good luck GG anyway. I think I have to claim money back too, since they charged me for internet access before they sent me the hardware.
MichiS
Oct 30 2006, 3:04 pm
QUOTE(hams @ Oct 30 2006, 2:52 pm)

Out of interest, is there a regulatory ombudsman for the Telecom's industry?
There is.
http://www.bundesnetzagentur.de/enid/6c034...85bd5,0/xn.htmlQUOTE(hams @ Oct 30 2006, 2:52 pm)

Are there any TV programmes similar to the British 'Watchdog' where consumers name and shame, or magazines such as 'Which' with consumer reports from experts in varying fields?
There are several. But I can't remember the names.
But I think people got fed up with hearing about Deutsche Telekom and
Deutsche Post every week.
UrbanAngel
Mar 17 2008, 1:26 pm
Sort of similar, I've been billed by the Mieterverein even though I don't live in Germany and the money has already been taken from my account, so I prepared a letter in German but not sure if it's harsh enough to send. If anyone could take a look and clear up the grammar mistakes and suggest alternatives for the content, I'd really appreciate it. So annoying!
Beendigung der Mitgliedschaft xxx.xxx
Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren,
ich habe Ihnen einen Kündigungsbrief am 02.07.07 geschickt, da ich am 13.09.07 nach England umgezogen bin, und habe daher kein Bedarf, Mitgleid bei Ihnen zu sein.
Sie haben mir am 03.07.07 geantwortet, dass die Kündigung erst gültig ist, wenn ich Ihnen meine amtliche Abmeldebescheinigung zuschicke. Das habe ich in November 2007 getan.
Nun habe ich neulich gesehen, dass Sie am 02.01.08 trotzdem €62 von mein Konto ohne Erlaubnis abgezogen haben.
Ich bitte Sie deshalb, dass Sie innerhalb von den nächsten 20 Werktagen das Geld züruck am mein Konto überweisen. Sonst müsste ich juristische Hilfe aussuchen.
Mit freundlichen Grüssen
sarabyrd
Mar 17 2008, 1:29 pm
Perfect. But if this was a Lastschrift (direct debit) you can protest it within six weeks after the debit.
EDIT: Oops, just registered the date of the debit.
Change that last paragraph to:
Ich fordere Sie auf, diesen unberechtigt abgebuchten Betrag bis 10. April (Eingang auf dem Konto) zu erstatten. Bei fruchtlosem Fristablauf werde ich die Angelegenheit meinem Anwalt übergeben.
UrbanAngel
Mar 17 2008, 1:40 pm
Wow that's great Sarabyrd - thanks! Fingers crossed
YorkshireLad6
Mar 17 2008, 1:56 pm
QUOTE(sarabyrd @ Mar 17 2008, 1:29 pm)

Perfect. But if this was a Lastschrift (direct debit) you can protest it within six weeks after the debit.
EDIT: Oops, just registered the date of the debit.
6 weeks after a valid statement showing the debit, actually
QUOTE(UrbanAngel @ Mar 17 2008, 1:26 pm)

Nun habe ich neulich gesehen, dass Sie am 02.01.08 trotzdem €62 von mein Konto ohne Erlaubnis abgezogen haben.
If you've only just seen the debit, maybe you only just got a bank statement showing it? In which case you are within time to retract the payment.
Malcolm Spudbury
Mar 17 2008, 2:56 pm
Couple of minor grammatical corrections:
QUOTE(UrbanAngel @ Mar 17 2008, 1:26 pm)

...
Sie haben mir am 03.07.07 geantwortet, dass die Kündigung erst gültig ist, wenn ich Ihnen meine amtliche Abmeldebescheinigung zuschicke. Das habe ich im November 2007 getan.
Nun habe ich neulich gesehen, dass Sie am 02.01.08 trotzdem €62 von meinem Konto ohne Erlaubnis abgezogen haben.
...
UrbanAngel
Mar 17 2008, 3:29 pm
I logged into my account online which is when I noticed it. I can't remember seeing it on a bank statement but it's more than possible I overlooked it!
You are viewing a low fidelity version of this page. Click to view
the full page.