Take it easy, Parnell. I'm an ex-pat for 5 years and hope not to go back so long as Bush and co. are in office. In fact, the thing that would most signal that the country was headed back in the right direction to me is very unlikely to happen...so is the case. That 'Moran' pic looks like something right out of my old stomping grounds in America, I grew up with the worst of that, and was told that if I didn't like it, I could find a better place to live--the assumption being, of course, that there ARE no better places to live. I'm also very disappointed with the direction the place is headed--and you can check out former posts by me and that statement will be borne out. But the principles--and you're right, they're not American, but they are supposed to be foundational principles of the 'democratic experiment' that is America, and it is always those I refer back to. If there's no other evidence for my viewpoints, viewpoints that are considered 'extreme' by many Americans, there is the fact of the Patriot Act, an act that I abhor, and one that I think signals the fact that terrorists won on September 11--because terrorism is violence perpetrated to effect political ends, and Americans getting so scared that they barter their freedoms away for an illusion of security--that looks like a victory for Al Queda to me. I suspect I'm pretty much in line with what you have to say, politically--I admire Moore, for example, though I question his tactics. I admire Noam Chomsky as well, though I question his insistence on always blaming America (whatever that is) and assuming that the opposite side is always a victim and/or operative of vast American conspiracies to take over the world who have run afoul of their bosses. I admire REAL thinkers like Foucault much more than either of these two, and he's French, but he doesn't have a lot to say about specific events today--more theory. I think about this stuff, and I do so critically, and I think the USA has a lot to answer for. But then, I think that about most politicians, no matter where they're from. So take it easy. I suspect we could have a good evening out over Dunklesweissbier and manage to sort out most of the world's problems with such monster intelligence EVEN WHEN we were wholly pissed. Course, that's the problem. It'd just be talk, and while that does change things, it doesn't change enough.
I'm off the cuff here. If you wanna see how I really think, I can provide a
link to more reflective words I have written on the subjects at hand. I don't think we have that much to disagree about, and I assume your saying 'good post' is reflective of that.
Points:
QUOTE
problem is you're a victim of you're own logic - the original poster started out with the individual and then went to the country as a generalisation - I merely mirrored that.
Can't answer for someone else's words. And if this is how you read the original post, as blasting other nations, I can't answer for that. I didn't see it--but maybe I'm being obtuse. In any case, I think generalizations as a rule are not usually all that good for actually getting to the root of the problem.
QUOTE
freedom of speech is not an American concept as you should know well - it certainly did not originate there.
Didn't say that, but it is supposed to be a founding principle of the laws in that nation. That doesn't always work in practice, but I do think the principle a fundamentally sound one, whoever you want to credit with it. In fact, I'd say it's one of the most important rights to be protected.
QUOTE
I did not get personal , I made a deliberately over-the-top remark that the guy was whining at length and threw in a picture just to show the mentally challenged amongst us that I was joking - if you bothered to read my overly long post earlier you would have realised this.
Okay. I'll cop that, with this proviso: your 'whiney pussy' post could have been taken the wrong way. Tone is hard to measure in written text, and sometimes irony doesn't come through as clearly as you might wish. Thus arise misunderstandings.
I know. I've been working on forums--with bloody artists, no less--for a few years. I've seen people come to the online equivalent of blows over really ridiculous shit.
QUOTE
I assure you I'm not being emotional although I do continue to think you are - where in my post do I express emotion
I'm sure I am being emotional on some level, but I did want to try my hand at controlling those emotions in the interests of promoting a civil discussion of the matter, instead of people flinging mud at each other over their nationalities. As to your own emotionality, which you insist you don't have (and kudos to you for escaping, somehow, that fundamental human state), try this on for size:
QUOTE
I dont hate Yanks , I just think they are dumb to hate on others ...
or this
QUOTE
On a final point if I was in the States (which I have been and return to quite often on business) and I started moanin on about how Yanks were a bunch o losers or fatasses (or whatever) , most of those with guts would tell me to ge the fuck out if it was so bad... which is EXACTLY what I say back to all the damn Yanks who are tryin to take a bite outta me right now (although blow me if anyone of em has made a logical argument besides "Why is everybody beatin on me ?")
Although I'm certain you have encountered both of these scenarios in your dealings with Americans, I'm not sure DW's original post is particularly hateful--he took the piss out of the French, sure, but hey--teasing the French is fun, and most of the French I've encountered are pretty amiable about having it done to them--but even that he qualified by saying he loved French culture. Hate? Throw that at Bush, and I think you'd have a point. I'm not sure it's so strong in relation to DW's original post. On the second, one of the things that pissed me off most about growing up where I did was people who WOULD say 'get the fuck out if it was so bad'--how about offering cogent criticism in an effort to fix the problem? Coming from the mouth of an Okie redneck, I didn't like this sentiment, and I'm not really any more convinced of it's validity when it comes from an Irishman (or woman, though your words do have that masculine tang...). Then there is the matter of Yanks trying to take the bite outta you right now...maybe...but I think the benny of the doubt was extended early on in the conversation when Ketchup said 'That's a pretty broad and extremely offensive statement if you are indeed being serious.' As an Irishman (or woman), I would expect you to give the conditional upon which this sentence ends its full value.
Lighten up. We're all humans, we all end up in the same place, and we all shit. We are also, in my mind, all very prone to being capable of much more than we actually accomplish--something that might go a long way to explaining the state of the world, no matter who's in charge.
I'm cool if you are.