TT logo
You are viewing a low-graphics version of this page. Click the headline to view full version:

TT to be available via Mozilla-based browsers only

Update: Firefox switch date: 31.Dec.2007

Toytown Germany > Discussion forum > Themes > Metachat
Pages: 1, 2, 3
Hazza
hahaha...
Darkknight
QUOTE (Iceberg Slim @ Jul 19 2005, 9:27 pm)
This is simply not true. We have some of the best auditing software on the market, our pc's are locked down and our physical audit still turns up software we didn't know about. If it makes no registry or WMI entry, you cannot see it. All you can do is simply get rid of all unknown executables, but that doesn't work either. You can zip your firefox folder when you're not using it. IT knows all, sees all, and controls all is a myth. I have 900 pc's that my IT is responsible for and we spend a lot of money trying to stop just such things - it's a waste of time. A clever user will always find a way.
*

Then perhaps you can come to my place and explain the detailed reports made every friday about all our PC's.. Yes you can xip the stuff up and it won't be found,
but even if it doesn't add stuff to the registry. cool.gif Not all networks are the same
Topsy
teehee - what a wheeze laugh.gif
BadDoggie
QUOTE (Iceberg Slim @ Jul 19 2005, 10:27 pm)
This is simply not true.
*

Yes it is.
QUOTE (Iceberg Slim @ Jul 19 2005, 10:27 pm)
We have some of the best auditing software on the market
*

No you don't.
QUOTE (Iceberg Slim @ Jul 19 2005, 10:27 pm)
our pc's are locked down and our physical audit still turns up software we didn't know about.
*

Then your audit sucks and your methods suck.
QUOTE (Iceberg Slim @ Jul 19 2005, 10:27 pm)
If it makes no registry or WMI entry, you cannot see it.
*

Patently false.
QUOTE (Iceberg Slim @ Jul 19 2005, 10:27 pm)
You can zip your firefox folder when you're not using it.
*

Wrong again. Too cumbersome, takes too much time, leaves too much of a trail. Portable Firefox may be a solution, but only if I haven't locked down a system so hard that you can only run specific whitelisted applications.
QUOTE (Iceberg Slim @ Jul 19 2005, 10:27 pm)
IT knows all, sees all, and controls all is a myth.
*

Then your company needs a serious BOfH. I may be in the market for a new job.
QUOTE
I have 900 pc's that my IT is responsible for and we spend a lot of money trying to stop just such things - it's a waste of time. A clever user will always find a way.
*

Look into Win2K/Win2K3 administration. Learn Microsoft's Group Policy Editor. Play with DameWare (remote control) for a bit. You can stop users doing anything you want.

From a technical standpoint you can control the (l)users. What might slip through the cracks can be controlled by specific usage policies and management, but there's little you can't control with shipped and free tools already.

woof.
Kza
With computers anything is possible, its really easy to tap into filesystem hooks that make a note of every file written to or read from. And its pretty hard for average users to get around.

And you can have totally locked down systems where all drives are network mounted, and after someone logs out, all changes except those expressly permitted are undone. But you can get around that too. And a clever admin can get around users that try to get around it.

A user could even boot up with a knoppix cd or something, but theres both obvious tricks (like no cd rom drive) and network based tricks that can prevent that too, of course a clever user could get around those tricks, and an even cleverer admin could get around those user hack around, and an even cleverererer user could get around... You get the idea..

Basically it comes down to who is cleverer, the admins or users. And the only way to have a clever admin is for him or her to have actually batteled against even cleverer users, and the only way for those users to have gotten clever is if they battled against even cleverer admins.

Thats why most flats I lived in we always had a "anything technically possible is permitted" rule regarding network security. We basically hammered each other with every trick we could come up with, until everyones systems were rock solid, and thats how security should work in the real world too.

Thats why virus writers and hackers deserve so much praise, who else is encouraging OS developers and admins, and of course users themselves (because its the users that have ultimate responsibility) to keep systems secure?

Anyway, by 2007 I am sure IE will be firefox compatible smile.gif
Nicky
Guess he had his fun. And proved the TT addiction.
MajorBummer
Quote of the day.
QUOTE
With computers anything is possible

Editor Bob, thanks for not being an evil browser dictator after all. Nice one,
MajorB
Marshbot
QUOTE (Editor Bob @ Jul 20 2005, 1:32 am)
Please ensure that you have installed Firefox, or another Mozilla-based webbrowser, within the next 30 months if you wish to continue using the TT service.

Thanks.
*

But ONLY 30 MONTHS!!!
Aaaaargggghh, and then what will I do!? Hmmmm? What if I haven't installed another web browser by then!? Tell me people... THEN what will I do!?

Goodbye in advance, cruel TT world.
I am going to run into the garden now and flail my arms wildly.
Kay
Phew!
Thank you, Editor Bob, I was afraid that I'd have to spend the next five days frantically writing down
all the tips, addresses and other useful info that I've seen on TT over the past two months and which
I'm going to need very, very soon...
Kay
jml
QUOTE
I am going to run into the garden now and flail my arms wildly.

Its a bit hot for that innit Marshy. I sat around tearing my hair out a while (I needed a trim anyway) and poked into my editor bob vodoo dolls. I think it helped.

6784kqe
cheers bob

[img]http://www.russellcroweheaven.com/bio/bio3/thumbs-up-%20tongue.jpg[/img]
gideon
nice descision. thanks EB.

could one of the ever present tech-headies here please explain to me why such a move is good, what the fuck a modzilla (or whatever) browser is and how in 30 months time, those of us whose interest in a computer is at best what colour the screen saver is, will know we're TT compatible?
Marshbot
It does help, Jml.
I set up a high pitched keening for a while, rocking back and forth etc... but the neighbours came outside and threw variously weighted items at my head.
Obviously they just don't understand what Editor Bob is doing to us.
Nobody ever thinks about the children.
cowgirl
Thank you Bob! The farmer would have noticed if I had installed FireFox on his computer and then he would have spanked me or shut me in the barn or done something terrible to me like cutting off my hooves and turning them into a soup for using his computer and now none of this is going to happen and I can keep visiting you guys when he is out working on the fields.
DrivinWest
QUOTE (Kza @ Jul 20 2005, 9:12 am)
With computers anything is possible
*

Reminds me of Zombo.com.
Kza
@gideon, im sure ed bob is still kidding, noone makes web site compatibility predictions 2 years in advance, things change too fast. What specific advantage ed bob had in mind, if any, only he can answer, but theoretically I can think of only 3 reasons why such a switchover could be made:

Philosophy: Making a statement against microsoft or in favor of open source for any number of reasons.

Security: Anything that encourages more secure browsers at the expense of less secure ones is at least partially well meant.

Technical: Perhaps he (or more likely invision the makers of the software) want to make use of a technology that microsoft refuses to support in internet explorer. Such as XUL which lets you do a lot more inside a browser than what html allows. But I checked invision and they arent planning any such changes.

Personally neither are really good reasons for a site like TT. Normal forum based www sites should target versions of html rather than specific browsers.

It was definitly just a wind up, he probably wanted to demonstrate, to the sz journo, one of the most popular, funny, interesting and worthwhile types of post found on TT: The trollpost.
Chicago
let's see...

first the story is "If you don't change your ways, I'm leaving you next week!"

then the reply is: "But honey, I can't do anything about it. That's how things are at work."

then the story changes to: "OK then, if you don't change, I'll leave you in 2 years!"

why do I get the feeling that I've had this argument before - with former girlfriends?!?!
roots
I don't think Evil Bob was kidding. I think he actually planned the switcheroo on the 25th but when he saw the reaction he decided to make it look like a joke. This man is pure evil I tell ya.
Iceberg Slim
The truth is, there is no Editor Bob. He's like dread-pirate roberts - but controlled by a mega-conglomerate that's just a front for the alien-robot-overlords that really run the earth. The current EB is actually a giant super-intelligent gorilla with rocket-eyes.
TexasTornado
Cowgirl, If I thought I could get spanked by a farmer for downloading firefox, I would have done it months ago!

Slim, There is too an Editor Bob. I've met him and he looks exactly like his photo on the membership forum.

Bad Doggie, woof. I even did a rather understated woof.
OhFFS
QUOTE (TexasTornado @ Jul 20 2005, 1:55 pm)
Cowgirl, If I thought I could get spanked by a farmer
*

Might I interject an "Oo ar" at this point?
RockThrust
This must be a joke...

Very odd behaviour if it isn't.

No way am I installing two browsers.

So it would be goodbye TT if that was the case sad.gif
RockThrust
...and Mozilla/Firefox is not more secure than IE.

Just check the online IT Press...
Pages: 1, 2, 3
You are viewing a low fidelity version of this page. Click to view the full page.