Jimbo
Jun 27 2005, 9:42 am
QUOTE
Actually, if you all don't like the system, why are you all even bothering to bitch about it? Any chance of you taking the higher road and saying nothing about it, since either A, you have opted out and it doesn't affect you or B; you seriously don't care enough to worry about it either way.
But no, I suppose stomping the ground, crossing your arms in front of you and screaming "It's not FAIR!!" is better for us all.
Freedom of speech Showem - this thread is at least as valid as, say, criticising the luggage capacity of the BMW 1-series or ruining somebody's chances of selling their car by pointing out how over priced it is. If you're gonna start criticisng threads on the grounds of being somewhat pointless, more or less all of M&RC has got to go...(along with nearly all my posts ever).
Showem
Jun 27 2005, 9:48 am
Fair point Jimbo. It just seems that if I was concerned enough about the thing to opt-out, I might put a one-time post of why I was doing it, rather than continually harping on about it.
DDBug
Jun 27 2005, 9:49 am
Does that mean if I get - 5 or +5 it's most likely from showem ? hmmm
Showem
Jun 27 2005, 10:02 am
DDBug, anyone who has been on the board longer than 2 years can send 5s.
So, from regular posters, that could be anyone of a number of people. But yeah, I can zap you with my Emporer-like powers too.
Inflatablewoman
Jun 27 2005, 10:03 am
QUOTE (DDBug @ Jun 27 2005, 10:49 am)
Does that mean if I get - 5 or +5 it's most likely from showem ? hmmm

yip, just look when her or one of the other oldies are online. Not that hard to work out who hates ya.
Carm
Jun 27 2005, 8:56 pm
Or likes ya?
DDBug
Jun 27 2005, 10:37 pm
Ah - but I don't (personally) know anyone who has been on the board that long - except showem.
But my only zaps so far have been from a fellow 2 point owner ;-)
interplanetjanet
Jun 27 2005, 11:34 pm
DDBug, there are actually several people who have been around that long. I can think of at least ten off the top of my head. You probably just never realized they've been around that long.
DDBug
Jun 27 2005, 11:44 pm
Nope - I know there are a bunch of them, I just don't know them. Personally or here. Or I haven't paid attention to who has been here that long cuz I don't think it's that important.
Hazza
Jun 28 2005, 1:09 am
You can see how long people have been members from their profile.
Or from the members list
here.
Most active long term posters are on the first page or 2...even infrequent posters. It all adds up!!
roots
Jun 28 2005, 2:34 am
If you sort it by join date and ascending order you will find that 64 peeps joined in 2002. Hundreds more joined in 2003 and they all have that evil -5 karma power. Don't forget that the father of all evil Mr. Editor Bob himself is not only a part but also the leader of this axis of evil.

All evil doers will be brought to justice, said one famous president recently
interplanetjanet
Jun 28 2005, 8:16 am
QUOTE
Nope - I know there are a bunch of them, I just don't know them. Personally or here. Or I haven't paid attention to who has been here that long cuz I don't think it's that important.
Um, ok, but what exactly is the "nope" for? That doesn't contradict what I said at all.
Jimbo
Jun 28 2005, 9:42 am
QUOTE
I haven't paid attention to who has been here that long cuz I don't think it's that important.
That's -50 karma for you then
DDBug
Jun 28 2005, 9:55 am
My world just came tumbling down! (Though I did check to see how long you have "been here")
Jimbo
Jun 28 2005, 9:56 am
Not quite two years - I joined September 2003. But I've opted out of the system so I neither receive nor give karma so you're safe (as if you actually give a shit).
Keydeck
Jun 28 2005, 10:24 am
Also I think the September 24th, 2002 thing on the older members is a carry over from the original system. We certainly didn't all sign up on the same day.
I've been looking at the Karma thing the last couple of days. It seems to be somewhat random in many cases. Or certainly no explicable reason I can see for the way the voting goes.
boomtown_rat
Jun 28 2005, 10:34 am
I actually had a look now to see if I could emulate Yeti and boost my karma a bit but some of the innocuous postings that seem to accrue big plus points for Yeti (along with bland postings from me that have been whacked with -ve karma)makes me think its either very random or favoritised to certain people. Never mind eh.
Showem
Jun 28 2005, 10:36 am
Yeah, I'm not quite sure what Spudgun/Moonboot didn't like about
Green beans vs. Wax beans to mark it negative. Guess they just don't like beans?
boomtown_rat
Jun 28 2005, 10:37 am
ah good. -3 for keydeck and I for the last couple of posts - expected bad karma for that. Doesn't seem much point bothering really
edit...and showem now
so anon1 is IW then - piling on the + points for parnell
parnell
Jun 28 2005, 10:59 am
Agree with some others - its clearly my mates who are giving me karma - and I inturn will give them karma when they make a half or full assed post - some of my better posts (not many) likewise get negative loving - was even called a troll recently.
The only way to sort this out is via karma messaging where you know where it comes from and why.
@ BR
You pissed at me maing ? Just hit ya with some positive k.
boomtown_rat
Jun 28 2005, 11:02 am
not pissed at you parnell - just the system seems a bit random. Very kind with the +
boomtown_rat
Jun 28 2005, 11:03 am
QUOTE (parnell @ Jun 28 2005, 11:59 am)
The only way to sort this out is via karma messaging where you know where it comes from and why.
would most likely cause no end of disputes and bad feelings though I guess
parnell
Jun 28 2005, 11:08 am
@ BR
I think that bad feelings develop when people suspect others have grudges against them and cant address that. If someone dislikes me for some reason and has the guts to say it to me I've got a lot more respect than if the same person spreads shit about me behind me back where I have no chance to redress that. Im part of a huge board where this sort of thing occurs - MTV has already mentioned that the pair of us were about to go to war over a misunderstanding but gladly he helped me pull my head out of my ass and we're mates now. To my mind it's a case of wrong/misguided/misinterpreted information which can be solved by openness.
interplanetjanet
Jun 28 2005, 11:11 am
I have to say that this new "log file" is hilarious. I never dreamed what benign posts people would give me negative karma for:
QUOTE
I personally have the most trouble understanding others, though I can speak quite reasonably and my written German is great. That's because most of my German practice is on Ebay.
QUOTE
Nah, my hubby's the same way. It's one thing to pull out of your brain what a word means when you hear it; it's another thing entirely to pull a word out of nowhere when you need it.
QUOTE
It's far from longest, but I specifically remember from my physics courses: Wahrscheinligkeitsverteilungen (probability distribution).
And ooh, ooh, wait! The dreaded fraction of an inkling deeper than laughing at poo poo jokes post (by a big bad 'old schooler', no less):
QUOTE
To be perfectly fair, it's a bit premature to label parnell's question as rhetoric (we need to see where he's going with it first), and calling an opinion an opinion does not exempt one from having to back it up. If you have an opinion and don't wish to back it up, then say so, but that does not mean that it *should not* be backed up - just that you don't feel like it.
boomtown_rat
Jun 28 2005, 11:13 am
after researching I know what you mean IPJ
a big veteran -5 for appreciating a post by Silva
QUOTE
Silva - can't believe they are all true but some of them are very good!
Owain Glyndwr
Jun 28 2005, 11:15 am
yeah i pinged from an old schooler twice this morning (the person tried three times but the system wouldn't let them). I don't really see why answering someone's question about living in Johanneskirchen sincerely and objectively deserves 5 negs but what the hell, this old schooler must have their reasons, even if i can't fathom them.
randy
Jun 28 2005, 1:41 pm
QUOTE
Also I think the September 24th, 2002 thing on the older members is a carry over from the original system
July or so, wasn't it? Couldn't find anything older than
October, though.
Katrina
Jun 28 2005, 2:03 pm
To clarify, I can't give +5 or -5 (due to joining date and non-supporter and non-mod status), can only give a +/-3 and give very little karma (either + or -) out. per se
The system is bolloxed huh katrina?
One member, one vote I say.
FREEDOM FOR TOOTING!
interplanetjanet
Jun 28 2005, 2:08 pm
It's a bit stupid that someone who's been around for a few months has the same karma power as someone who's been around over a year.
Yeti
Jun 28 2005, 2:10 pm
Well IPJ you just gotta hire a karmaslinger, a karmassasin so to speak.
QUOTE (interplanetjanet @ Jun 28 2005, 3:08 pm)
It's a bit stupid that someone who's been around for a few months has the same karma power as someone who's been around over a year.
Serious question now IPJ - Are you therefore suggesting that an idiot whose been online since forever has more right than an intelligent member who has been on 5 minutes? This doesn't take into any account new members who may have been on other Chat Forums for over a decade, or the cerebally challenged TT oldies.
The whole Karma thing is open to abuse. Over the weekend I spent some time going through Bob's new Karma Log Files to see how + and - karma is given, and in roughly half the cases the member's post that was karma'd was totally innocuous... which suggests that roughly half of all karma given is between percieved Friends and Enemies. At that point I decided to opt out. I'm too old for this kind of kiddie nonsense.
Finally, as I said before, and I'll say it again. The TT community is slightly different to other Chat Forums, in so much as we all have a chance to meet face-to-face. I sincerely believe that Bob has made an error in the incorporation of this karma malarky, and TT has deteriorated as a result of its inception. Time will tell.
boomtown_rat
Jun 28 2005, 2:26 pm
QUOTE
and in roughly half the cases the member's post that was karma'd was totally innocuous... which suggests that roughly half of all karma given is between percieved Friends and Enemies
I seem to have come to that conclusion too. Started off quite promising but seems to have ended up as a mixture of how it shoul dbe but also as you describe it above
Keydeck
Jun 28 2005, 2:30 pm
QUOTE
or the cerebally challenged TT oldies
Oi !!!
Inflatablewoman
Jun 28 2005, 2:31 pm
HEY YOU!!!Sick and tired of being a
nobody? Sick and tired of people
ignoring your posts? Sick and tired of being 92nd in the karma rating with a +6 / -1 vote?
I have the
solution!!!
Yes, you can rent me to make
YOU look popular! Every time you post, I will quote you, and reply with either an animated smiley or a witty comment. Yes, even YOU, you sad pathetic poster can seem like the
man of the board!
As the
funniest Toytowner, my replies will add humour even to your crappy efforts of forum hilarity. Due to the fact that I am the
third greatest Toytowner of all time, when I quote your message in mine it is 5x more likely to be read!*
Karma
worries? Never fear as part of the package you will get +3 karma for every post you make from me!** You will soon be climbing that karma board and hanging with such forum celebs such as
Yeti,
Keydeck or
showem.
So now your thinking how much is all this going to cost me? What is the outlay to gain forum
notority?
All I can say in this post, is that its
cheaper than you think...
PM ME FOR RATES*As proved in an independant study by the Inflatablewoman For Internet Sainthood Organisation
**While stocks last
interplanetjanet
Jun 28 2005, 2:36 pm
QUOTE
Serious question now IPJ - Are you therefore suggesting that an idiot whose been online since forever has more right than an intelligent member who has been on 5 minutes? This doesn't take into any account new members who may have been on other Chat Forums for over a decade, or the cerebally challenged TT oldies.
Nah, of course not. If the karma thingy has to exist, I think everyone should have the same karma power. I was just saying that
if it must be weighted toward long-time members, then it should be a linear scale (i.e. >6mo = +2, >12mo = +3, >18mo = +4, >24mo = +5, etc.).
Showem
Jun 28 2005, 2:46 pm
I don't believe you people think Inflatablewoman is more Jedi than me. He doesn't even pass the Star Wars circle of knowledge birthdate test.
Yeti
Jun 28 2005, 2:49 pm
A Jedi craves not these things.
Showem
Jun 28 2005, 2:50 pm
I still struggle with the Code.
Yeti
Jun 28 2005, 2:52 pm
Struggle not, there is no struggle. Know !
QUOTE (interplanetjanet @ Jun 28 2005, 3:36 pm)
Nah, of course not. If the karma thingy has to exist, I think everyone should have the same karma power. I was just saying that
if it must be weighted toward long-time members, then it should be a linear scale (i.e. >6mo = +2, >12mo = +3, >18mo = +4, >24mo = +5, etc.).
But then it could also be weighted towards number of posts a members has, or if they're a TT Supporter, or even shoe size.
interplanetjanet
Jun 28 2005, 2:53 pm
Sure. As I said already, I think it should be even across the board.
Whassup? Small feet?
Yeti
Jun 28 2005, 2:54 pm
Shoe size ? At last my karma score has been explained.
To get some real mud-slinging going your karma resevoir should be based on the karma you get.
Inflatablewoman
Jun 28 2005, 2:56 pm
QUOTE (Yeti @ Jun 28 2005, 3:52 pm)
Struggle not, there is no struggle. Know !
I have [img]http://www.keithball.net/img/toi_town/flashingPositiveKarma.gif[/img]'d so much that I cant [img]http://www.keithball.net/img/toi_town/flashingPositiveKarma.gif[/img] any more. That makes me

.
interplanetjanet
Jun 28 2005, 3:01 pm
QUOTE
Whassup? Small feet?
Size US5/UK3.

Edit: I guess that explains my karma, too!
roots
Jun 28 2005, 3:03 pm
QUOTE (Yeti @ Jun 28 2005, 3:54 pm)
Shoe size ? At last my karma score has been explained.
nah, I think your Karma is tied to the motorbike rides with Katrina. I know where all of Karmina's +ve karma is going
oli2000
Jun 28 2005, 3:28 pm
I've had enough of this infantile nonsense and opted out.
Power to The People Oli2000
conniebee
Jun 28 2005, 3:31 pm
why so obsessed with karma
You are viewing a low fidelity version of this page. Click to view
the full page.