QUOTE (Bert @ May 10 2005, 5:26 pm)
No it is not. Its his job to stop or better still prevent violence. If he is worth his salt he will never have to use violence.
Bzzzt!!! You lose the luggage.
I wrote
...violent when necessary and when you're alone, not backed up and
two guys are a threat (and possibly three), you have a microsecond to make a decision.
The bouncer was able to hit the Irish guy. The Irish guy was in his range which means the bouncer was also in the Irish guy's range. You don't know that the Irish guy hadn't already started to swing or indeed hadn't already hit him.
There was no one else there to back up the bouncer. It's incredible how quickly eevning up the playfield deflates most problems of this nature but
the bouncer/doorman was alone with three guys who had been drinking for ten hours and who were up for it. They'd already left the bar.
Do you really believe the bouncer went running after them or called to them and told them to come back and fight him? Does that make
any sense to you? They were drunk, they left, one went up to the bouncer and one of his two mates was on his way over to assist against a lone bouncer.
From the police report:
QUOTE
Einer der drei Iren geriet unvermittelt mit dem 23-jährigen afghanischen Türsteher in Streit. Der 29-jährige kam seinem Freund zu Hilfe.
One of the three Irish abruptly got into a conflict with the 23-year-old Afghani Doorman. The 29-year-old [Irishman] came to help his friend.
It doesn't say who threw the first punch. Maybe it
was the doorman. We don't know. But he had no back-up and he had few options. I'd like to know what the hell the Irish guys started to begin with.
woof.