I really don't understand this whole debate. In my opinion, the only case in point of banning the burqa is if the woman herself doesn't have the full right to decide if she wants to wear the damn thing.
And how, exactly , would you determine that?
If she herself, without having been pressured to do so by anybody, decides to cover herself fully, why can't we just accept it?
How about: a reasonable person would assume that nobody would 'choose' to cover themselves in this fashion.
If nuns wear their funny nun uniforms or Jews, buddhist monks or Shinto priests their garb, we also accept that, here in Europe. I agree, it the burqa looks shit, but I see so many people dressed shitty every day and can't ban that either, why once again pick on Islam?
There are two ideas in this one sentence, but, I'll address them both. Firstly, it is established societal decorum to show your face in public. Secondly, Islam has a well founded reputation for the repression (by western standards) of women, despite what its adherents claim.
If the argument is the war on terror and the fact that the government cannot identify said women, I say all the better for these women. There is too much surveillance already and it's de facto useless as we've seen in England. Too much information to process.
I am not aware of any rational person who believes that the burqa represents a security issue.
I think Sarkozy said it well:
"We cannot accept to have in our country women who are prisoners behind netting, cut off from all social life, deprived of identity,"
"That is not the idea that the French republic has of women's dignity.
"The burka is not a sign of religion, it is a sign of subservience..."