Advertisements:
Monster
Meetic

Race and dating

Your thoughts on the elephant in the room

sparkling
Here is a more scientific view of the whole thing
http://discovermagazine.com/1994/nov/racewithoutcolor444
quite long, but interesting.

I also recommend the book Guns, Germs and Steel from Jared Diamond. It tries to explore human history. Doesn't answer all the questions, but at least motivates to question more. Helps us understand "us" and "others" better. According to him, and many other scientists, we are all blacks anyway. Just adapted to our geography during our migrations.
perdido
Why do they even record it? It shouldn't matter what "race" anyone is - and recording it doesn't help in terms of unity within a nation. Plus with people intermarrying more and more, there are a lot of people who don't fit into these neatly defined boxes and the whole thing becomes a bit of a guess anyway...
Well until affirmative action is ended you will see these records kept and boxes still present in U.S. society. Well that is another arguement we have covered way too much.
Lavender Rain
I read that book and it's a very good read. Here's a link from Amazon. Over 1000 people wrote a review of this thought provoking book.
perdido
Props LR.

A great book.
Lorelei
They classify by race, yes, but its hardly like calling someone a spic, wop, chink, nigger, etc...
The PC terms clearly have racist undertones as they single people out because of their race for no good reason: i.e. they do exactly what the corresponding derogatory terms do. Why use them at all? Why does a non-white American have to have a racial label attached to them?

If I call someone African American, that is really as polite as you can get.
Perhaps it would be politer to just call them an American.
lilplatinum
Why do they even record it? It shouldn't matter what "race" anyone is - and recording it doesn't help in terms of unity within a nation. Plus with people intermarrying more and more, there are a lot of people who don't fit into these neatly defined boxes and the whole thing becomes a bit of a guess anyway...
Sociological issues, I suppose. I agree, it should be ignored.
Owain Glyndwr
I never claimed it was, we were being semantic about cultural grouping vs ethnic grouping.
culture is a factor of ethnicity but it does not equal ethnicity. Ethnicity recognises a common religion, language, culture, and behaviours.
Lavender Rain
Props LR.

A great book.
Thanks, but the praise should really go to sparkling she mentioned it first. I simply facilitated the link to Amazon and seconded her great recommendation.
perdido
Oops you are correct. Sparkling props.

Perhaps it would be politer to just call them an American.
Exactly especially if that "african-american" was never born there or been there. We had this arguement once at a TT meet up. You do not call one Irish or Polish american if they were not born there or even lived there. Yet if you are Mexican or African not born there or lived there it is placed upon never the less. It is because previous subconcious thought that was placed there from our society and childhood. Once we stop the degrees of seperation based on ethnic background and on rather individual/personal traits then we finally progress. Case in point:

Did anyone ever notice how the Arc smelled funny on the nights Timmeh was there? I mean a shower every now then doesnt hurt ...does it? Then again he was eye candy.
llees
Did anyone ever notice how the Arc smelled funny [s]on the nights Timmeh was there[/s]?
Fixed.
Pas
culture is a factor of ethnicity but it does not equal ethnicity. Ethnicity recognises a common religion, language, culture, and behaviours.
I'm not sure I really know what 'ethnicity' is at all. I guess it's a way to replace the concept of tribes in a modern world where tribes no longer means anything?
sparkling
culture is a factor of ethnicity but it does not equal ethnicity. Ethnicity recognises a common religion, language, culture, and behaviours.
This definition tells me ethnicity changes and evolves over time, it is not a constant. In this respect, I think the term African-American doesn't define ethnic background but just race. For many generations now, the blacks in America have the same religion and language as the white Americans. There are sub-cultures and different behaviors in various groups, but such differences exist also among whites.

Exactly especially if that "african-american" was never born there or been there. We had this arguement once at a TT meet up. You do not call one Irish or Polish american if they were not born there or even lived there. Yet if you are Mexican or African not born there or lived there it is placed upon never the less. It is because previous subconcious thought that was placed there from our society and childhood. Once we stop the degrees of seperation based on ethnic background and on rather individual/personal traits then we finally progress.
Maybe it's because the Irish or Polish Americans are in the majority and dominant white race. I agree with your points btw.

Who is smelly Timmeh?
edit: never mind, i found out
flint24
Awesome replies. Although the thread was about race in relation to dating, it's good to see some of the replies with data on what defines as a race and all that.

And by the way, for those of you who are confused, the elephant in the room is American slang for seeing a big very noticeable problem but choosing to ignore it out of comfort or whatever. It doesn't mean you supposed to date an actual elephant. Don't know where the term came from but we use it often in America.

So you would date someone who is 600 lbs? Or is it okay to rule people out based on certain set of physical characteristics you find unattractive, but not others?
Not wanting to date a 600 lbs person because they're too fat and not wanting to date a black person is very different for two reasons: 1) there may be some "fat" people that are actually somewhat attractive and you might date, as opposed to a person that doesn't date an entire race of people and would not think about dating a person even if they are cute to them, and 2) being fat is almost always a result of your diet. Something you can help given the right discipline. I know because I use to be fat. Being black or white or asian is something you can't help. You're born that way. Most physical attributes like hair color and eye color can be changed, and isn't in the same category as racial discrimination when dating. Except maybe for the late great Michael Jackson, there hasn't been anybody yet that's been able to change their race/skin color like they'd change their hair color. It isn't the same. Sorry

Actually, there are some races/colours/whatever you want to call it that I find really unattractive in general though. I hate myself for it because it really upsets me when I hear some guys say that they don't find black women attractive but I guess all it comes down to is that we all have our own preferences.
First of all, lesbians are awesome! Secondly, you have every right to your own preference, but ask yourself, as a women are you maximizing the possibility of finding love by limiting yourself to a certain ethnic group or race? Are you daring enough to get out of your comfort zone and go to places you've never gone before?

Does it piss you off as much when people say they don't find short/tall/overly fat/overly small/redheads/pale women attractive?
Again, you're mixing race with physical attributes. Height, eye color, hair color... all these things can be changed or modified.

All those terms have come to have heavily derogatory meanings. If I call someone African American, that is really as polite as you can get. Some people even still take offense to such simplifying terms as "black". But my point is, terms having to do WITH race, such as the PC terms, are completely different from being a racist.
Never saw a black person getting pissed for being called black, and I grew up with black people. That's not been my experience.

As to dating outside my race... dang. I have to plead guilty to discriminating (as I'm sure many other people who are honest could do). My mother is black, father is white, and I go almost exclusively for white guys. The availability of black guys might have something to do with why I'm just not interested in that many of them. Black dudes have been trying to get into my pants since I was 11 and there is just nothing new or special about a guy who goes "hey baby" on the street, regardless of color. There is something about the boldness and forwardness of a man (of any race) who doesn't even know me that turns me off. The first thing I wonder is how many women he's kicked that tired-ass line to this week. Forget it.

Of course if I meet a black guy and we sit down and have a conversation about something other than how I got into these jeans, then maybe we're getting somewhere.
Some of the non-white girls who replied I noticed seem to have a problem with men of their own race. Now I don't mean to take sides here, but I like to look at things from all sides. You make these sweeping statements about guys in your race by saying they have tired pickup lines or their chauvinistic or whatever, but then you also mention you don't like white guys who use you just to say they've been with something exotic. But there's no sweeping arguments about white guys being all out to get dark or non-white women for their exotic appeal. It's just a few. But for the non-white men, seems to be they are all chauvinistic or players. Must be good to be a white guy in Germany. No negative stereotypes to fight off. No but seriously, think about what you're saying. Are you really giving the non-white guys the same chance as a white guy, or do you expect something negative from them right off the bat? It's these subconscious things that you don't even notice that you really have to think about.

Interesting topic. This used to be a big theme between my friends and I back in uni. Most of us are mixed race and people generally dated along lines that reflected their family attitudes towards certain races/cultures. Those who had negative experiences with a particular race or culture generally tended to avoid guys from that background. Then there were friends who out of curiousity because they knew so little about one of their parent's backgrounds almost exclusively dated guys from that background, in our circle, most of these girls eventually stopped this behaviour because it led to a lof of negative experiences, mostly through unrealistic expecations. Finally, there were those who had neutral experiences or mostly positive experiences growning up and took less conscious decisions about racial/cultural backgrounds when dating, thinking about it now, these tended to be the girls that had had a dominate mix eg. weren't half this and half that or were completely of one race.
REALLY REALLY good points! It's interesting that you also pointed out the family background and the parents involvement in shaping a persons perspective on race. More times than usual, a girl who says "you're my first [insert race] guy" is usually one who's parents or family has a problem with someone outside their race.

Here is a more scientific view of the whole thing
http://discovermagazine.com/1994/nov/racewithoutcolor444
quite long, but interesting.

I also recommend the book Guns, Germs and Steel from Jared Diamond. It tries to explore human history. Doesn't answer all the questions, but at least motivates to question more. Helps us understand "us" and "others" better. According to him, and many other scientists, we are all blacks anyway. Just adapted to our geography during our migrations.
I remember way back in Biology 101 in college my professor talking about this. It's no secret that the human race, homosapien sapien, migrated from eastern Africa. Ethiopia to be exact. Through genetic mutations brought on by the varying climate throughout the world, we all developed different physical features from each other. African people, living in hot dry climate developed dark hair to protect their scalps from the beating sun and broad noses to inhale oxygen in the oxygen lacking climate of sub Saharan Africa. European people, living in cold and barren climate developed blonde hair to absorb more sunlight, lighter skin and upward shaped noses because of the oxygen rich climate of northern Europe. It's only recently that certain features were considered beautiful due to numerous things like television and magazines.
Lavender Rain
in a modern world where tribes no longer means anything?
Except for this one.
Pas
Except maybe for the late great Michael Jackson, there hasn't been anybody yet that's been able to change their race/skin color like they'd change their hair color. It isn't the same. Sorry
Hams and Hazza can do it in a flash. If I'd met Hazza and he'd been wearing traditional Indian clothing I'm sure I'd think him Indian to this day. As it is I thought he was white. Hams is similar. She dresses and acts European and I think of her in that way. If she wore traditional Pakistani clothing than I suspect that would change my perception of her.

I think you're stating as black and white something that's very much shades of brown. Perception is king.
You are viewing a low fidelity version of this page. Click to view the full page.