There's no difference at all, the stewards were lied to in both cases.
Well, I think you're being blind if you think they are the same.
1. MS involved in an incident where he parks the car, blocking other drivers - unprovable, but was given a penalty as it was highly questionable.
2. LH involved in incident. Lied to stewards afterwards. On a second hearing when presented with the EVIDENCE of the offence, continued the lie.
Big difference. We can agree that Schumi may have lied, but we cannot prove it one way or the other. We can prove Lewis' offence without a shadow of a doubt and see that he and the team colluded in deceiving the stewards.
Oh come off it, I have no idea how long you've been following F1 but spying has always been going on, the teams even employed people to listen in to other teams radios and to take covert pictures of the cars.
I agree spying always goes on, but the trick is not being caught. You get caught, you get spanked. Also the level of the McLaren's spying and the evidence against them warranted the fine they received.
Spying has been going on at every level for years. You will be hard pressed to find anyone in F1 that thought that fine was anywhere near justified.
Max, Bernie, Ferrari and probably a number of others too.
Especially when Renault got caught doing the same thing and got off scot free.
I don't recall them doing the same thing. Do you mean their part in the McLaren scandal?